145,538 research outputs found
Introducing OpenStreetMap user embeddings: Promising steps toward automated vandalism and community detection
Li, Y. & Anderson, J. (2021). Introducing OpenStreetMap user embeddings: Promising steps toward automated vandalism and community detection
In: Minghini, M., Ludwig, C., Anderson, J., Mooney, P., Grinberger, A.Y. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Academic Track at the State of the Map 2021 Online Conference, July 09-11 2021, 23-26. Available at https://zenodo.org/communities/sotm-202
Chapter 04: Strengthening Medical Oncology at MD Anderson with the Aid of NCI Researchers in the Department of Biostatistics
Dr. Gehan recollects Dr. R. Lee Clark’s approach to funding, recruitment, and management and the attraction of MD Anderson/Houston to Dr. “Tom” Frei III, his wife Elizabeth “Liz” (nee Smith), as well as himself. Dr. Olson mentions from Kenneth Endicott (NCI Director) to Dr. R. Lee Clark (President, MD Anderson) lamenting the move of Dr’s Frei III and Freireich to MD Anderson. When Dr. Gehan started at MD Anderson in 1967, Dr. Lee D. Cady Jr. was the Head of the Department of Biomathematics. Dr. Gehan talks about the impact of the arrival of Dr’s Frei III and Freireich on MD Anderson Research. Dr. Gehan cites the cooperative group collaboration model of NCI/NIH Clinical Chairman Dr. C. Gordon Zubrod and biostatistician Marvin A. Schneiderman on the first randomized trials in acute leukemia and solid tumors. He recalls the members of the administration and the research team at MD Anderson before the arrival of Dr’s Frei III and Freireich: Dr. H. Grant Taylor, Chairman of the Southwest Oncology Group (Southwest Oncology Group), epidemiologist Eleanor Josephine McDonald (known for creating the National Cancer Registry) statistician Kenneth M. Griffith, Dr. Roy C. Heflebower, Joe E. Boyd and Dr. Stuart O. Zimmerman, Chairman of the Biomathematics Department. He also mentions other MD Anderson administrators and researchers: Terry L. Smith, Dr. Peter F. Thall, Dr. J. Jack Lee, President Dr. Charles A. LeMaistre, Dr. Frederick F. Becker and President Dr. John Mendelsohn. Finally, he talks about the Department of Biostatistics, how it differs from Biomathematics, and the effort to strengthen medical oncology at MD Anderson.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/1313/thumbnail.jp
P. ANDERSON*, M.-C. CAUVIN*, E. COQUEUGNIOT*, M.-L. INIZAN** et M. LE CHEVALLIER***. - Workshop on PPN chipped lithic industries. Berlin, 29 Mars-2 Avril 1993.
Anderson Patricia C., Cauvin Marie-Claire, Coqueugniot Éric, Inizan Marie-Louise, Lechevallier Monique. P. ANDERSON*, M.-C. CAUVIN*, E. COQUEUGNIOT*, M.-L. INIZAN** et M. LE CHEVALLIER***. - Workshop on PPN chipped lithic industries. Berlin, 29 Mars-2 Avril 1993.. In: Paléorient, 1993, vol. 19, n°1. pp. 209-210
P. ANDERSON*, M.-C. CAUVIN*, E. COQUEUGNIOT*, M.-L. INIZAN** et M. LE CHEVALLIER***. - Workshop on PPN chipped lithic industries. Berlin, 29 Mars-2 Avril 1993.
Anderson Patricia C., Cauvin Marie-Claire, Coqueugniot Éric, Inizan Marie-Louise, Lechevallier Monique. P. ANDERSON*, M.-C. CAUVIN*, E. COQUEUGNIOT*, M.-L. INIZAN** et M. LE CHEVALLIER***. - Workshop on PPN chipped lithic industries. Berlin, 29 Mars-2 Avril 1993.. In: Paléorient, 1993, vol. 19, n°1. pp. 209-210
Chapter 10: MD Anderson Head & Neck Surgery Advances with Dental Oncology, Plastic Surgery and Neurosurgery
Dr. Byers talks about the role of dental oncology under Dr. Joe B. Drane, Head of UT Dental Branch/Dental Oncology, and the work done by Drs. James (Jim) C. Lemon and Jack W. Martin in managing dental problems with radiotherapy patients and fabrication of dental prostheses (ears, noses, dentures, swallowing apparatus). He then discusses the “free flap” plastic surgical method, and ENT/plastic surgery doctors Stephen S. Kroll, Mark A. Schusterman, Geoffrey L. Robb and David L. Larson who performed the surgery. Finally he mentions the role of neurosurgery, praises Neurosurgical Drs. Milam Leavens and Ray Sawaya, and finally discusses the Head & Neck department’s prominence in terms of MD Anderson case admission volume.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/surgeryhist_interviewchapters/1020/thumbnail.jp
Lycodapus pachysoma Peden and Anderson 1978
Lycodapus pachysoma Peden and Anderson, 1978 Lycodapus pachysoma Peden and Anderson, 1978: 1944, figs. 5, 9, 16 (type locality: off Oregon, USA); Anderson, 1988: 106, fig. 41; Anderson, 1990b: 266, fig. 12; Trunov, 1999: 492; Mecklenburg et al., 2002: 735, text fig. Material examined. Scotia Sea: USNM 356649 (1 specimen; 197 mm SL), off Candelmas Isl., 56°58.7'S, 26°30.6'W, 1681-1655 m, ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 37, 10 ft beam trawl, 22 May 1975, H. H. DeWitt. Weddell Sea: MNHN 1990-646 (1; 102 mm SL); Halley Bay, 74°30.0'S, 29°20.0'W, 0-1223 m, POLARSTERN sta. 252, Agassiz beam trawl, 6 Feb. 1989, W. Arntz. South Shetland Islands: MCZ 123478 (1; 191 mm SL), 62°17'S, 57°26'W, 0-1000 m (bottom depth 1975-1998 m), POLAR DUKE sta. KEH94- RMT31, midwater trawl, 8 Nov. 1994, K. E. Hartel. MCZ 126859 (1; 52 mm SL), 62°17'S, 57°50'W, 0-1000 m (bottom depth 1978-1986 m), POLAR DUKE sta. KEH94-RMT30, midwater trawl, 8 Nov. 1994, K. E. Hartel. Diagnosis. Lycodapus pachysoma is distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of characters: vertebrae 16-18 + 59-65 = 75-82; gill raker ratio as percent 50-88; adults with relatively robust bodies and long heads. Description. Complete descriptions found in Peden and Anderson (1978) and Anderson (1988). Vertebrae 17-18 + 60-62 = 77-80; D 70-72; A 61-62; P 7-8; C 9; pelvics absent; branchiostegal rays 6; gill rakers 13 + 11-12 = 12-15; vomerine teeth 3-17; palatine teeth 7-17; pseudobranch filaments 1-3; pyloric caeca 2; preopercular pores 4; mandibular pores 4; interorbital pore 1. Following proportions as percent SL: head length 20.1-22.2; head width 8.3-9.1; head depth 11.7-12.6; predorsal length 24.1-26.2; preanal length 40.9-42.8; body depth 7.1-8.6. Following proportions as percent HL: upper jaw length 50.2-51.6; eye diameter 12.1-15.9 (21.9 in 52 mm juvenile); snout length 35.3-37.9; pectoral-fin length 19.6-23.8. Gill raker ratio 59-65%. Remarks. Trunov (1999) reported this species from the Maud Rise, Lazarev Sea.Published as part of M. Eric Anderson, 2006, Studies on the Zoarcidae of the southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica., pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 1110 on pages 8-
Lymantes nadineae Anderson
Lymantes nadineae Anderson Lymantes nadineae Anderson 2009: 117. Anderson 2016: 120. Reference should be made to the original description of L. nadineae (Paquin and Anderson 2009), as the slightly revised description in Anderson (2016) included specimens of L. reddelli. Similarly, as the measurements and body form ratios given in Anderson (2016) for L. nadineae included specimens of L. reddelli, these need to be revised as follows: body length 3.5–4.2 mm, body width 1.1–1.3 mm, pronotum L/ W 1.30 –1.50, elytra L/ W 2.00 –2.10. The larger, more robust specimens reported in Anderson (2016) are L. reddelli. Material examined. Holotype male, Texas: Williamson County, Electro-Mag Cave, 27 Dec. 2006, P. Paquin, C. Crawford, K. White, found dead on a flowstone (CMNC). Allotype female, Texas: Travis County, Tooth Cave, 19 May 1965, T. C. Barr (CMNC). Paratype female, Texas: Williamson County, Phraetica Cave, 20 June 2002, M. Warton (TMMC). Additional specimens: TEXAS: Bell County, Tahuaya Tube, 28 Apr 2018, P. Diaz (1, TMMC). Williamson County, Zapata Cave, 4 Oct 2016, R. Barlow (1, CMNC). Anderson (2016) made some errors in the depositories and presentation of the label data associated with specimens of this species. These are corrected here. Specimens listed in Anderson (2016) as L. nadineae but not listed above are L. reddelli.Published as part of Anderson, Robert S., 2022, A new species of eyeless Lymantes Schoenherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae: Lymantini) from Texas caves, pp. 383-388 in Zootaxa 5087 (2) on pages 385-386, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5087.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/582428
Correspondence, Phoebe Fairgrave Omlie to C. M. Anderson, 1929
Correspondence from Phoebe Fairgrave Omlie at Mono Aircraft Corporation, in Moline, Illinois, to C. M. Anderson at the Memphis Chamber of Commerce, in Memphis, Tennessee, on 1929 July 5.https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-mss-phoebefomlie2/1003/thumbnail.jp
Oidiphorus mcallisteri Anderson 1988
<p>Oidiphorus mcallisteri Anderson, 1988</p> <p>Oidiphorus mcallisteri Anderson, 1988: 102, figs. 8B, 38 (type locality: off South Georgia); Anderson, 1990b: 272, fig. 19.</p> <p>Material examined. USNM 356656 (1 specimen; 114 mm SL), Scotia Sea, W. of South Orkney Islands, 60°45.5'S, 48°13.5'W, 2511-2542 m, ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 116, 10 ft beam trawl, 18 Feb. 1976, H. H. DeWitt.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Oidiphorus mcallisteri is distinguished from its only congener, O. brevis, by the following combination of characters: pelvic fins present; preoperculomandibular pores 7; suborbital pores 5; pectoral fin rays 14-17; precaudal vertebrae 18; dorsal fin origin associated with vertebrae 3-4.</p> <p>Description. Vertebrae 18 + 51 = 69; D 64; A 52; P 16; C 7; pelvics 2; branchiostegal rays 6; gill rakers 1 + 7; vomerine teeth 11; palatine teeth 9/9; pseudobranch and pyloric caeca absent; preoperculomandibular pores 7; suborbital pores 5 + 0; postorbital pores 2; supraorbital (nasal) pores 2; occipital and interorbital pores absent. Following proportions as percent SL: head length 20.8; head width 12.5; head depth 11.5; predorsal length 21.1; preanal length 41.2; pectoral base depth 6.8; pectoral-fin length 12.5; body depth 9.3; gill slit length 9.2. Following proportions as percent HL: head width 60.3; head depth 42.2; upper jaw length 51.1; snout length 23.2; eye diameter 21.9; gill slit length 44.3; pectoralfin length 60.3; pelvic-fin length 19.8; caudal-fin length 33.8; interorbital width 15.6; interpupillary width 30.8. Pectoral base/length ratio: 53.9%.</p> <p>Dorsal edge of gill cover forming horn-like projection when pulled forward owing to subopercular ramus projecting well above opercle, characteristic of Oidiphorus. Single, low pyramidal papilla between each mandibular and suborbital pore, none on cheeks or top of head. First gill arch with single, miniscule raker on upper limb, unlike types. Lateral line mediolateral, difficult to trace in this faded specimen (Anderson, 1988, mistakenly stated lateral line to be absent).</p> <p>Remarks. This is the third known specimen of O. mcallisteri and is slightly larger than the two types (Anderson, 1988), but agrees well with them in all respects. It is a ripe female and had 33 ova 1.5-2.2 mm in diameter, 23 of them 2.0 mm or larger.</p>Published as part of <i>M. Eric Anderson, 2006, Studies on the Zoarcidae of the southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica., pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 1110</i> on pages 9-1
Dieidolycus leptodermatus Anderson 1988
Dieidolycus leptodermatus Anderson, 1988 Dieidolycus leptodermatus Anderson, 1988: 72, fig. 15 (type locality: eastern Scotia Sea); Anderson, 1990b: 257, fig. 1. Material examined. Scotia Sea: USNM 356650 (3 specimens; 115-150 mm SL) and RUSI 60087 (2; 88-171 mm SL): off Candelmas Isl., 57°00.4'S, 26°10.1'W, ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 38, 10 ft beam trawl, 2744-2745 m, 22 May 1975, H. H. DeWitt. USNM 356655 (1; 134 mm SL): W of South Orkney Islands, 60°45.5'S, 48°13.5'W, ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 116, 10 ft beam trawl, 2511-2542 m, 18 Feb. 1976, H. H. DeWitt. Diagnosis. Dieidolycus leptodermatus is distinguished from its two congeners by the following combination of characters: suborbital pores 6, occipital and interorbital pores absent, pectoral-fin rays 16-17; dorsal fin origin associated with vertebrae 2-3 (not 23' as mistakenly given in Anderson, 1990b). Description. Vertebrae 22-23 + 55-58 = 78-81; D 73-77; A 55-59; P 16-17; C (6) 8-10; pelvics 2; branchiostegal rays 6; gill rakers 2-3 + 9-11 = 12-13; vomerine teeth 6-15; palatine teeth 6-17; pseudobranch absent. Following proportions as percent SL: head length 21.3-24.7; head width 9.5-11.3; head depth 11.0-11.6; predorsal length 23.2-24.6; preanal length 46.6-48.4; pectoral base depth 4.4-5.2; pectoral-fin length 12.9-14.0; body depth 9.2-10.9; gill slit length 7.5-8.4. Following proportions as percent HL: head width 40.7-52.9; head depth 49.1-52.1; upper jaw length 34.5-38.5; snout length 26.5-33.0; eye diameter 12.4-15.5; gill slit length 33.4-37.4; pectoral-fin length 58.1-62.4; interorbital width 6.6-7.9; interpupillary width 20.3-27.2; caudal-fin length 20.9-25.4; pelvic-fin length 7.2-24.4. Pectoral base/depth ratio: 31.7-40.1. Head roughly triangular, eye (spectacle) small, head pores prominent, with whitish outline. Flesh gelatinous, but lateral line present (usually absent in gelatinous zoarcids; Anderson, 1994). Lateral line originating just above upper end of gill opening and coursing midlaterally to tail tip (lateral line said to be absent in original description owing to faded specimens; Anderson and Pequeno-R, 1998). Pelvic-fin length highly variable, as dermal sheath covering rays extends distally with growth. Smallest specimen (88 mm SL) with pelvic length 24.4% HL, two largest (150-171 mm SL) with pelvic length 7.2-9.2% HL respectively. Caudal fin rays also quite variable, with usually 2 epural and 7-8 hypural rays, but one fish with 0 + 6 rays and one with 1 + 8 rays. Preoperculomandibular pores 8, suborbital pores 5 + 0, supraorbital (nasal) pores 2, postorbital pores 2 (1 and 4 present except one in USNM 356650, 115 mm SL, with left postorbitals 1, 3 and 4 present), interorbital and occipital pores absent. Remarks. This rare eelpout was originally described from three specimens taken in the Scotia and Ross seas at depths of 2273-3040 m by the U.S. Antarctic Research Program in 1966-1967. The present six specimens include four smaller and one larger than the type series, including the largest known, a 171 mm SL juvenile female. The size of the immature ovary of this specimen indicates the species probably attains more than 300 mm.Published as part of M. Eric Anderson, 2006, Studies on the Zoarcidae of the southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica., pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 1110 on pages 3-
- …
