1,721,013 research outputs found
Proceedings of the first ADVISES Young Researchers Workshop
The research training network Analysis Design and Validation of Interactive Safety-critical and Error-tolerant Systems (ADVISES) focus on coaching and supervising Post Docs and Ph.D. students. The main objective is to provide a multi-disciplinary researchtraining that can combat the impact of human error during the design, operation and management of safety-critical, interactive systems. Additionally, the exchange of knowledge, practices, tools and experience between adjacent (but still too distinct)disciplines can lead to the efficient integration of complementary research methods. Ultimately, it is hoped that this will contribute to a new and more unified research agenda for the development of safety-critical, interactive systems. One of thetraining instruments is the Young Researchers Workshop, which is arranged and coordinated by the young researchers themselves. It is an event where the young researchers have opportunity to present their work based on paper submissions. At this firstworkshop a series of papers, three of these is included in this proceedings. The first paper by Sandra Basnyat and Philippe Palanque, argues that in order to reduce the occurrence of erroneous events in the design of safety-critical interactive systems itis necessary to apply formal description techniques for task and human error modeling and to extend information usually represented in a standard task model to explicitly express user deviations. The second paper by Bastiaan A. Schupp, emphasize thatcurrent approaches to integrating human factors issues in the development of safety critical systems appear is not fully sufficient and argues for creating a safety architecture based on a Safety Modeling Language, which uses barriers to prevent of stopundesired effects. The third paper by Alexandre Alapetite is a position paper on voice recognition in multimodal systems focusing on a case study of anesthesia patient journal. In emergency situations during anesthesia, when doctors and nurses are busyand maybe stressed, the registration process is delayed. This is a problem, because postponing the registration often leads to uncertainty, inaccuracy and other errors. It is argued that multimodal systems in a non-intrusive way can support suchactivities.The research training network Analysis Design and Validation of Interactive Safety-critical and Error-tolerant Systems (ADVISES) focus on coaching and supervising Post Docs and Ph.D. students. The main objective is to provide a multi-disciplinary research training that can combat the impact of human error during the design, operation and management of safety-critical, interactive systems. Additionally, the exchange of knowledge, practices, tools and experience between adjacent (but still too distinct) disciplines can lead to the efficient integration of complementary research methods. Ultimately, it is hoped that this will contribute to a new and more unified research agenda for the development of safety-critical, interactive systems. One of the training instruments is the Young Researchers Workshop, which is arranged and coordinated by the young researchers themselves. It is an event where the young researchers have opportunity to present their work based on paper submissions.At this first workshop a series of papers, three of these is included in this proceedings. The first paper by Sandra Basnyat and Philippe Palanque, argues that in order to reduce the occurrence of erroneous events in the design of safety-critical interactive systems it is necessary to apply formal description techniques for task and human error modeling and to extend information usually represented in a standard task model to explicitly express user deviations. The second paper by Bastiaan A. Schupp, emphasize that current approaches to integrating human factors issues in the development of safetycritical systems appear is not fully sufficient and argues for creating a safety architecture based on a Safety Modeling Language, which uses barriers to prevent of stop undesired effects. The third paper by Alexandre Alapetite is a position paper on voice recognition in multimodal systems focusing on a case study of anesthesia patient journal. In emergency situations during anesthesia, when doctors and nurses are busy and maybe stressed, the registration process is delayed. This is a problem, because postponing the registration often leads to uncertainty, inaccuracy and other errors. It is argued that multimodal systems in a non-intrusive way can support such activities
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Methods for analysing team situation awareness relating visual and other behavioural data
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
