1,720,963 research outputs found

    Hemin enhances the 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy effect through the changes of cellular iron homeostasis

    No full text
    Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been utilized as a promising alternative cancer treatment due to its minimum invasiveness over the years. Exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) triggers protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) accumulation, which happens in cancer cells. However, certain types of cancer exhibit reduced effectiveness in the PpIX accumulation mechanism. This study aimed to determine the effect of ALA-PDT combination with hemin on gastric carcinoma TMK-1 cells. Methods: This study utilized TMK-1 gastric cancer cell line to evaluate PpIX, ROS, and Fe2+ accumulation following the administration of ALA, hemin, and a combination of ALA and hemin PDT. We also evaluate the mRNA expressions related to iron homeostasis and treatment impacts on cell viability. Results: The co-addition of ALA and hemin PDT for 4 h of treatment resulted in a significant decrease in cell viability by up to 18 %. While ALA-PDT enhanced PpIX metabolism, the addition of hemin influenced both the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cellular iron homeostasis by inducing Fe2+ accumulation and affecting mRNA levels of IRP, Tfr1, Ferritin, NFS1, and SDHB. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the addition of ALA and hemin enhances phototoxicity in TMK-1 cells. The combination of ALA and hemin with PDT induces cell death, evidenced by increased cytotoxicity properties such as PpIX and ROS, along with significant changes in TMK-1 gastric cancer iron homeostasis. Therefore, the combination of ALA and hemin could be one of the alternatives in photodynamic therapy for cancer in the future

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore