1,720,964 research outputs found
Open Peer Reviewers in Africa Workshop Trainer Guide
No full textThis Trainer Guide is meant to help researchers and professionals who want to be Trainers for the Open Peer Reviewers in Africa workshop series developed as a collaboration between AfricArXiv, Eider Africa, eLife, PREreview and Training Center in Communication Africa and funded by the Wellcome Trust. In order to be a Trainer, we recommend that you have attended the workshop yourself as a cohort trainee. Materials and resources related to the workshop are linked inside.
Our goal is to establish a Trainer-of-Trainers (ToT) model in which workshop participants are encouraged and empowered to mobilize, recruit and train colleagues in their respective scholarly communities.
This guide is NOT meant to be prescriptive about how anyone should conduct their training. We encourage you to consider the content as suggestions for your own training and feel free to adapt it to your needs and circumstances.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/a
Writing – original draft (training materials and project report): Saderi, Daniela
Writing – review & editing: Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Jo
Open Peer Reviewers in Africa Guide du formateur
No full textCe guide du formateur est destiné à aider les chercheurs et les professionnels qui souhaitent devenir formateurs pour la série d’ateliers Pairs évaluateurs ouverts pour l’Afrique développée en collaboration avec AfricArXiv, Eider Africa, eLife, PREreview et Training Center in Communication en Afrique et financée par le Wellcome Trust. Pour être formateur, nous vous recommandons d’avoir vous-même assisté à l’atelier en tant que stagiaire de cohorte. Le matériel et les ressources en rapport avec l’atelier sont liés à l’intérieur.
Notre objectif est d’établir un modèle de formateur de formateurs (ToT) dans lequel les participants à l’atelier sont encouragés et habilités à mobiliser, recruter et former des collègues dans leurs communautés savantes respectives.
Le présent guide n’est pas destiné à être prescriptif sur la façon dont les apprenants devraient mener leur formation. Nous vous encourageons à considérer le contenu comme des suggestions pour votre propre formation et n’hésitez pas à l’adapter à vos besoins et à votre situation
Divulgation : ces traductions ont été effectuées par Roseline Dzekem DINE.
Ce contenu constitue un modèle. Il est destiné à être adapté au public et à la culture, tous les exemples utilisés peuvent ne pas être pertinents ou appropriés.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/a
Writing – original draft (training materials and project report): Saderi, Daniela
Writing – review & editing: Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Jo
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
دليل المدرب لورشة عمل المراجعين المفتوحين في إفريقيا
No full textيهدف دليل المدرب هذا إلى مساعدة الباحثين والمهنيين الذين يرغبون في أن يصبحوا مدربين لسلسلة حلقات عمل Open Peer Reviewers ي إفريقيا التي تم تطويرها كتعاون بين AfricArXiv و Eider Africa و eLife و PREreview ومركز التدريب في مجال الاتصالات بإفريقيا وبتمويل من Wellcome Trust. لكي تكون مدربًا ، نوصيك بحضور ورشة العمل بنفسك كمتدرب جماعي. المواد والموارد المتعلقة بورشة العمل مرتبطة بالداخل.
هدفنا هو إنشاء نموذج لمدرب المدربين (ToT) حيث يتم تشجيع المشاركين في ورشة العمل وتمكينهم من تعبئة وتجنيد وتدريب الزملاء في مجتمعاتهم العلمية الخاصة.
لا يُقصد بهذا الدليل أن يكون توجيهيًا حول كيفية إجراء أي شخص تدريبه. نحن نشجعك على اعتبار المحتوى بمثابة اقتراحات للتدريب الخاص بك ولا تتردد في تكييفه مع احتياجاتك وظروفك.
لإفصاح:
هذا المحتوى عبارة عن نموذج ويهدف إلى تكييفه مع الجمهور والثقافة ، وقد لا تكون جميع الأمثلة المستخدمة ذات صلة أو
مناسبة.
----
This Trainer Guide is meant to help researchers and professionals who want to be Trainers for the Open Peer Reviewers in Africa workshop series developed as a collaboration between AfricArXiv, Eider Africa, eLife, PREreview and Training Center in Communication Africa and funded by the Wellcome Trust. In order to be a Trainer, we recommend that you have attended the workshop yourself as a cohort trainee. Materials and resources related to the workshop are linked inside.
Our goal is to establish a Trainer-of-Trainers (ToT) model in which workshop participants are encouraged and empowered to mobilize, recruit and train colleagues in their respective scholarly communities.
This guide is NOT meant to be prescriptive about how anyone should conduct their training. We encourage you to consider the content as suggestions for your own training and feel free to adapt it to your needs and circumstances.
Disclosure: This content is a template and is meant to be adapted to the audience and culture, not all examples used may be relevant or appropriate.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
All contributing authors in alphabetical order:
Alsop, Shane; Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Havemann, Johanna; Korzec, Kornelia; Munene, Aurelia; Namoune, Rachida; Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy; Saderi, Daniela; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Contributions were made as follows:
Conceptualization: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Data curation: n/a
Formal Analysis: n/a
Funding acquisition: Saderi, Daniela
Investigation: n/a
Methodology: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Project administration: Alsop, Shane; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Korzec, Kornelia; Onwuchekwa, Godwyns
Resources: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Owango, Joy
Software: n/a
Supervision: Saderi, Daniela; Havemann, Johanna; Munene, Aurelia; Ngugi; Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen; Outa, Nicholas; Owango, Joy
Translations: Dine, Roseline Dzekem; Fairhurst, Vanessa; Namoune, Rachida; Salem Youssef, Mohamed; Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lamis
Validation: Ngugi, Joyce Wangari; Obanda, Johanssen, Outa, Nicholas
Visualization: n/
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
