1,721,008 research outputs found
FIGURE 12 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
No full textFIGURE 12. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♀): A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, lateral; C, rostrum, dorsal; D, rostrum, ventral; E, rostrum, lateral.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on page 364, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
FIGURE 21 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
No full textFIGURE 21. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀: A–B) (♂: C): A, P1, anterior; B, P2, anterior; C, P2 endopod, anterior.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on page 374, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
FIGURE 11 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
No full textFIGURE 11. Lourinia wellsi sp. nov. (♀: A–B) (♂: C–D): A, urosome, ventral; B, P6, anterior; C, urosome, ventral; D, P6, anterior.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on page 362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
FIGURE 5 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
No full textFIGURE 5. Lourinia aff. armata (Claus, 1866) (♀: A, C) (♂: B, D): A, urosome, ventral; B, urosome, ventral; C, P6, anterior; D, P5 and P6, anterior.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on page 354, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
FIGURE 23 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
No full textFIGURE 23. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀: A–B) (♂: C): A, female, abdomen, ventral; B, P5, anterior; C, urosome, ventral.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on page 376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Louriniidae , Monard 1927
No full textFamily Louriniidae Monard, 1927 Ceyloniidae Scott, 1909, p. 227. Ceyloniellidae Monard, 1937 p. 83 Amended diagnosis. Copepoda Harpacticoida. Body slender and more or less cylindrical, without prominent distinction between prosome and urosome, first thoracic somite fused to cephalosome. Urosome 5-segmented in female; comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite and three free abdominal somites. Genital double-somite longer than wide, subdivided by discontinuous lateral sutures. Paired genital apparatus located ventrally on genital double-somite; copulatory pore located on ventral midline. Anal operculum straight. Urosome 6-segmented in male; comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite and four free abdominal somites. Caudal rami with six setae. Rostrum well developed, with rounded tip, anteroventrally directed. Antennule 7-segmented; third segment longest; fourth segment with aesthetasc fused basally to seta and arising from pedestal. Antennule 9-segmented in male; haplocer. Antenna biramous; with separate coxa; allobasis unarmed; endopod 1-segmented; exopod 1-segmented with two setae. Mandible with well developed coxal gnathobase; palp reduced. Maxillule with well developed praecoxal arthrite; with coxa. Maxilla with two syncoxal endites; allobasis represented by claw. Maxilliped vestigial, represented by tapering process, unsegmented with a seta distally. P1–P4 with 3-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods. Male P3 with 3-segmented endopod; second segment with apophysis. Spine and setal formula of P1–P4 as follows: P5 confluent; with well developed baseoendopod; exopod separate. Male P5 confluent, exopod fused to baseoendopod.Published as part of Karaytuğ, Süphan, Sak, Serdar, Alper, Alp & Sönmez, Serdar, 2021, Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), pp. 346-386 in Zootaxa 5051 (1) on pages 347-348, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5051.1.15, http://zenodo.org/record/556372
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
