1,721,037 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Case Studies of Roots, Tubers and Banana Seed Systems.
Full text linkThe seed systems of RTB (root, tuber, and banana) crops are unique because they are propagated from vegetative parts of the plant, not from true seed. RTB seed is thus bulkier, more perishable, and more subject to the attacks of pests and diseases than is true seed. Because of this, there is often a gap between potential and real crop yields, which seed interventions seek to narrow. Seed systems are formal or informal networks of people and organizations that produce, plant, and distribute seed. Informal systems may deliver low quality seed, but not always. This book describes 13 RTB seed system interventions, using a framework based on the concepts of seed availability, access, and quality. The 13 case studies included (1) a potato-growers association in Ecuador, (2) a hydroponic seed potato in Peru, (3) a yam seed technology in Nigeria, (4) a banana and plantain project in Ghana, (5) a sweetpotato seed project in Tanzania and (6) one in Rwanda, (7) a seed potato system in Kenya, (8) cassava in Nicaragua, (9) seed potato in Malawi, (10) disease-resistant cassava varieties in seven African countries, (11) a tissue culture banana project, (12) an emergency plantain and banana project in East Africa, and (13) a large cassava seed project in six African countries. Good seed may be available, but farmers may not have access to it if delivery channels are poor, if the seed is too expensive, or if farmers do not know about it. Without an intervention (e.g., a project), seed is produced on-farm; shared among friends, neighbors, and family; and sold in local markets (i.e., in an informal system). Some interventions try to organize farmers into new seed delivery channels. Some of these interventions succeed better than others. Seed can be distributed with vouchers, but that has a high administrative cost. Farmer organizations (or private companies) that are already well-structured may do a better job at distributing seed; but community nurseries can also be organized, especially if the goal is to distribute a new variety to farmers as a one-off, and not to create a permanent seed-supply enterprise. Most of the interventions in this book had some information on farmer demand, but not necessarily a rigorous understanding of the seed system. In spite of this, most of the new seed met farmer demand. Most interventions worked with improved varieties, but seed interventions could favor native varieties. Genetic purity is easier to manage in RTB crops, which breed true (they are clones), but seed health must be carefully managed. Market integration is important for developing a seed system. The seed can be made affordable by subsidies, for example, but farmers are more likely to buy seed if they can sell their harvests, or if they need a new variety to meet market demand (e.g., from a food manufacturer). The interventions described in this book did a fairly good job of linking stakeholders in mutually beneficial ways
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Conclusion: Cross-case analysis of RTB seed
No full textIn this chapter we present a cross-case analysis, using an adaptation of the multi-stakeholder framework for intervening in RTB seed systems (Sperling et al. 2013) (see this book s introduction and RTB 2016). We use the case studies presented in this book to identify ideas for successful RTB seed systems, summarized at the end of each section. We start by describing the types of interventions, then analyze them using the three main functions of a seed system (seed availability, seed access, and seed quality), focusing on the seed users. We then take a closer look at seed producers, policies, and multiplication techniques before concluding with recommendations (see Section 3 below). Throughout this chapter we refer to the case studies using the short names mentioned in Table 1 of the introductio
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
