1,720,992 research outputs found

    Diagnostic ultrasound in physiotherapy practice: a literature study

    No full text
    A litterature study of the use of diagnostic ultrasound by physiotherapists. Organisational affiliation of the review: The Department of Physiotherapy, University College Northern Denmark Organisation web address: https://www.ucn.dk/english/programmes-and-courses/physiotherap Review team members and their organisational affiliations: Mr Marius Fredriksen. The Department of Physiotherapy, University College Northern Denmark Mr Kjetil Nord-Varhaug. Apexklinikken Terapisenter, Oslo Professor Jens Lykkegaard Olesen. Research Unit for General Practice at Aalborg University Professor Janus Laust Thomsen. Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg Dr Allan Riis. Department of Physiotherapy, University College Northern Denmark Dr Camilla Aakjær. Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg Mr Stein Dragland. Spesialistklinikken, Håkons gate 4, 9405 Harstad Funding sources/sponsors. Internal Grant for focused research at the University College Northern Denmark in relation to the research project to Allan Riis Conflicts of interest: None stated . Review question: The aim of the study is to study the use of diagnostic ultrasound use by physiotherapists and to help clarify key concepts, gaps in research, and inform educational programs in the emerging field of diagnostic ultrasound. Searches: We will systematically search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMABASE, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and PROSPERO from their inception until November 2020. The search strategy use Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms/ Emtree headings, combined with free text words. We include the following International prospective register of systematic reviews MeSH/Emtree/free text terms: ‘diagnostic ultrasound’ and ‘physiotherapy’. Studies published in all languages will be considered for inclusion. Condition or domain being studied: Use of diagnostic ultrasound by physiotherapists Participants/population: Phyiotherapists and people with musculoskeletal disorders Intervention(s), exposure(s): Use of diagnostic ultrasound Types of study to be included. We include published prospective studies (interventional or observational), qualitative studies, cross sectional studies, economic studies. We will exclude studies with pregnant women, reviews, audits or service reports, conference posters or abstracts; and studies not undergoing peer-review. Inclusion criteria: Diagnostic ultrasound performed by physiotherapists Diagnostic ultrasound performed in primary care or secondary care B-mode ultra sound Studies in all languages Exclusion criteria: A-mode ultra sound M-mode ultra sound Studies with pregnant women Reviews, audits or service reports, conference posters or abstracts; and studies not peer-review. Main outcome(s). Narrative description of diagnostic ultrasound examination performed by physiotherapists Additional outcome(s): 1. Training background among physiotherapists performing diagnostic ultrasound 2. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scanning performed by physiotherapists 3. Change in the diagnosis after use of diagnostic ultrasound 4. Change in the treatment strategy after use of diagnostic ultrasoun

    sj-docx-1-sjp-10.1177_14034948231201690 – Supplemental material for Physical activity levels before and after the COVID-19 restrictions among Danish adolescents: a retrospective cohort study

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-sjp-10.1177_14034948231201690 for Physical activity levels before and after the COVID-19 restrictions among Danish adolescents: a retrospective cohort study by Martin Eilertsen, Allan Riis, Anne Nielsen and Henrik Riel in Scandinavian Journal of Public Health</p

    sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221112046 - Supplemental material for Difference in postural stability between STarT Back Tool subgroups of patients with low back pain under conditions of sensory deprivation and cognitive load

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221112046 for Difference in postural stability between STarT Back Tool subgroups of patients with low back pain under conditions of sensory deprivation and cognitive load by Stian Ingemann-Molden, Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Martin Bach Jensen, Thomas Graven-Nielsen and Allan Riis in Journal of International Medical Research</p

    sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221112046 - Supplemental material for Difference in postural stability between STarT Back Tool subgroups of patients with low back pain under conditions of sensory deprivation and cognitive load

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221112046 for Difference in postural stability between STarT Back Tool subgroups of patients with low back pain under conditions of sensory deprivation and cognitive load by Stian Ingemann-Molden, Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Martin Bach Jensen, Thomas Graven-Nielsen and Allan Riis in Journal of International Medical Research</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore