1,721,147 research outputs found
Figure 2 in An assessment of food habits and altitudinal distribution of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in the Western Himalayas, Pakistan
Figure 2. (1) Maize crop raided by a black bear in Malkandi reserve forest area, Kaghan Valley, Pakistan, 2013–2014. (2, 3) Photographs of scats found near the same forest area where bears raided maize crops.Published as part of Ali, Ashfaq, Zhou, Zhixiang, Waseem, Muhammad, Khan, Muhammad Fiaz, Ali, Ishtiaq, Asad, Muhammad & Qashqaei, Ali Turk, 2017, An assessment of food habits and altitudinal distribution of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in the Western Himalayas, Pakistan, pp. 689-701 in Journal of Natural History 51 (11-12) on page 697, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2017.1303097, http://zenodo.org/record/518025
An assessment of food habits and altitudinal distribution of the Asiatic black bear (<i>Ursus thibetanus</i>) in the Western Himalayas, Pakistan
Ali, Ashfaq, Zhou, Zhixiang, Waseem, Muhammad, Khan, Muhammad Fiaz, Ali, Ishtiaq, Asad, Muhammad, Qashqaei, Ali Turk (2017): An assessment of food habits and altitudinal distribution of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in the Western Himalayas, Pakistan. Journal of Natural History 51 (11-12): 689-701, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2017.1303097, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.130309
Hepatitis C virus entry: role of host and viral factors
Abstract not availableBaila Samreen, Saba Khaliq, Usman Ali Ashfaq, Mahwish Khan, Nadeem Afzal, Muhammad Aiman Shahzad, Sabeen Riaz, Shah Jaha
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Collaboration and Innovation in Food Industry
In the dynamic economic environment where knowledge is vastly distributed companies can no longer rely on their own research and are pushed to utilize outside sources to sustain growth. At the same time food industry involves large number of horizontal and vertical relationships, the very dynamic nature of these relationships play role in innovation. In order to fully capitalize on supplier-customer collaboration it becomes vital to understand the dynamic relation between packaging and processing industry and need to operate closely, develop ways to identify good partners and create & maintain fruitful collaboration. Based on this understanding the primary purpose of the research is to study interactions and relations between stakeholders in food industry, to gain an understanding of the driving forces for development in food processing and packaging technologies.This understanding can then be utilized to identify the barriers for collaboration.Title Collaboration and Innovation in Food Industry - Study on collaboration of packaging and process equipment industry with food manufacturing. Author Mustafa Ali Ashfaq Bombaywala Supervisor Malin Göransson, PhD Student at Division of Packaging Logistics, Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University. Issue of study In the dynamic economic environment where knowledge is vastly distributed companies can no longer rely on their own research and are pushed to utilize outside sources to sustain growth. At the same time food industry involves large number of horizontal and vertical relationships, the very dynamic nature of these relationships play role in innovation. In order to fully capitalize on supplier-customer collaboration it becomes vital to understand the dynamic relation between packaging and processing industry and need to operate closely, develop ways to identify good partners and create & maintain fruitful collaboration. However the research on collaboration with packaging and processing equipment industries as well as academia is rather limited. Purpose The primary purpose of the research is to study interactions and relations between stakeholders in food industry, to gain an understanding of the driving forces for development in food processing and packaging technologies. Also gain insight into the innovation process at major Packaging solution provider (PSP) and Process equipment manufacturers (PEM), their interaction, collaboration and information sharing with food manufacturing companies (FMC). This understanding can then be utilized to identify the barriers for collaboration. Method The research follows an inductive approach which starts with a premise and structure is built around the conceptual framework and the research objectives. Secondary data collected through literature survey was utilized to develop a conceptual model. Primary data was collected through interviews with experts from the industry and academia who have experience in working with innovation and collaboration. A non-probability sampling technique was adopted and II Semi-structured interview technique was followed. The interviews were transcribed to text and categorized under common themes which for analysis and comparison. To ascertain the credibility of the data it was triangulated and compared to literature. Conclusion The views of industry experts strongly reflect that the role of suppliers of processing and packaging in food industry is “contractual” in nature, whereas ingredient suppliers tend to be more mature partners in the innovation process. The innovation process at major food machinery and packaging companies corresponds well to the ‘food-machinery framework’ of open innovation (Bigliardi et al., 2010). It is apparent that food industry is taking steps to integrate external knowledge sources in the innovation process, still suppliers continues to play limited strategic role in innovation. Some barriers to collaboration were identified and they can be grouped into two types: technical and perspective. Technical factors constitute lack of technical expertise amongst food manufacturer, requirement for legal framework and difficulty in predicting future needs. But the more imperative barriers are lack of trust, skepticism about new technologies and conflict of interest Trust continues to be the major barrier for collaboration and further research needs to be focused on this aspect
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
