1,720,964 research outputs found
Clinician Awareness of Stickler Syndromes Among Australian Allied Health Care Professionals
Get PDFAlexis Ceecee Britten-Jones,1– 3 Lauren N Ayton,1– 3 Kelley Graydon,4 Jessica O Boyce,4 Ruth Braden,4 Rosie Dawkins,2,3,* Kwang Meng Cham1,* On behalf of The Stickler Syndrome Awareness Study Group1Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 4Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia, Tel +61 3 8344 5980, Email [email protected]: Stickler Syndromes are multisystem collagenopathies affecting 1 in 7500– 9000 individuals and are associated with craniofacial, ocular, auditory, and musculoskeletal complications. Prophylactic retinopexy treatment reduces the risk of retinal detachment, emphasising the need for early detection and multidisciplinary referral. This study evaluated knowledge and awareness of Stickler Syndromes among allied health professionals and their perceived needs for targeted education to improve multidisciplinary care.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken among audiologists, speech pathologists, optometrists, orthoptists, and physiotherapists in Australia. Survey questions included practitioner demographics, awareness and knowledge of Stickler Syndromes, confidence managing Stickler Syndromes, and perception of multidisciplinary care needs for Stickler Syndromes.Results: Of 180 healthcare professions who participated (79% female; 78% aged between 25 and 44 years), 55% indicated that they had heard of Stickler Syndrome, and 14% had directly worked with patients known to have Stickler Syndromes. Practitioners who had were either optometrists, orthoptists, or audiologists. The most recognised clinical sign of Stickler Syndromes was retinal detachment (selected by 66% of optometrists and orthoptists and 16% of other professions), but only 41% of optometrists and orthoptists (27% all respondents) selected cryopexy as a potential management strategy. Vitreous anomaly was recognised as a clinical feature by 20% of all respondents. Overall, 69% of allied health professionals did not feel confident managing Stickler Syndromes, and a similar number of practitioners (69%) indicated that they were willing to attend professional development courses for complex conditions such as Stickler Syndromes.Conclusion: This study provides meaningful insights on awareness and knowledge of Stickler Syndromes among allied healthcare professionals. Targeted clinician education, enhanced communication between healthcare entities, and multidisciplinary care programs can significantly improve the integrated care of Stickler Syndromes leading to better patient outcomes.Keywords: high myopia, vitreous anomalies, cleft palate, hearing loss, syndromic conditions, clinical education, Stickler Syndrom
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Panel-Based Genetic Testing in a Consecutive Series of Individuals with Inherited Retinal Diseases in Australia: Identifying Predictors of a Diagnosis
No full textBackground/Objectives: Genetic testing is important for diagnosing inherited retinal diseases (IRDs), but further evidence is needed on the utility of singleton genetic testing in an Australian cohort. Methods: A consecutive series of individuals with clinically diagnosed IRDs without prior genetic testing underwent commercial panel-based sequencing (Invitae or Blueprint Genetics), clinical assessment, and multimodal imaging. Retinal images were graded using the Human Phenotype Ontology terms. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate clinical predictors of a positive molecular diagnosis. Results: Among 140 participants (mean age 49 ± 19 years), genetic testing was undertaken, on average, 23 ± 17 years after the initial clinical IRD diagnosis. Of the 60% who received a probable molecular diagnosis, 40% require further phase testing, highlighting the limitations of singleton genetic testing. USH2A, ABCA4, and RPGR were the most common encountered genes; 67% of the probably solved participants had causative genes with targeted experimental treatments in ongoing human clinical trials. Symptom onset before the age of 30 (OR = 3.06 [95% CI: 1.34–7.18]) and a positive IRD family history (OR = 2.87 [95% CI: 1.27–6.78]) were each associated with higher odds of receiving a molecular diagnosis. Diagnostic rates were comparable across retinal imaging phenotypes (atrophy and autofluorescence patterns in widespread IRD, and the extent of dystrophy in macular IRDs). Conclusions: In an Australian IRD population without prior genetic testing, commercial panels yielded higher diagnostic rates in individuals with IRD onset before the age of 30 and those with an IRD family history. Further research is needed to understand the genetic basis of IRDs, especially isolated and late-onset cases, to improve diagnosis and access to emerging therapies
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
