17,045 research outputs found

    Block, Alexander Portraits Men

    No full text
    Digital Imag

    Extended Butterfly style "Alexander" home

    No full text
    Detail of support column at lowest point of butterfly roof; Designed by William Krisel and built by Alexander Construction Company, this home features a butterfly roof, original block fireplace, and sliding-glass doors that blend indoor and outdoor space. The butterfly roof is the more common "extended" style, with the asymmetrical V shape extended over the carport. The house has 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms

    Krim – Erkundungen am Rand Europas

    No full text
    The Crimean peninsula in the Black Sea, rich in history and charm, is of great geostrategic importance. This leads to political conflicts time and again. But what is everyday life like in Crimea beyond the discourses about law, borders and war? What do local intellectuals think about the situation today? Can Geopoetry help to counteract the current crisis? Tatjana Hofmann's ethnographic long-term observation explores these questions. Her poetic essay, illustrated with magnificent photographs by Alexander Barbuch, transcends the usual boundaries of genre and searches for perspectives far removed from common patterns of interpretation. Tatjana Hofmann, a Slavist and author, lives in Zurich. "Krim – Erkundungen am Rand Europas" continues her 2015 novel "Sewastopologia" continues

    Alexander & Co. $1.00 (one dollar) private scrip

    No full text
    This private scrip was issued in Sabine by Alexander & Co. The note is printed on the verso of a railroad bond. Ornate designs decorate the left and right borders of the note. The number ''1'' is printed in the center of the left border; the phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' is printed within the right. The abbreviation ''No.'' is printed within an oval design in the upper-left corner. The amount ''$1 00.'' appears in the upper-right corner in an oval design. The phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' appears across the face of the note in a wave design; the phrase ''1 ONE DOLLAR'' is printed beneath. The phrase ''ONE DOLLAR'' is overprinted in green ink towards the bottom of the note. A lacy red overprint decorates much of the note, and the word ''ONE'' is faintly printed in red ink as well. The year, 1862, is printed towards the lower-left corner. The following imprint appears beneath the year: Texas Printing House, Houston--E. W. Cave. The signature on the recto in the lower-right corner is blank. The business ''Alexander & Co.'' was owned by Charles H. Alexander, who by 1857 was the largest merchant and cotton broker in Jefferson County (Chapter VIII: A History of Jefferson County, Texas: Personal Glimpses by W. T. Block). In addition, Alexander owned steamers and blockade-running schooners that operated during the years of the Confederacy (Ibid.).[blank

    Alexander & Co. $2.00 (two dollars) private scrip

    No full text
    This private scrip was issued in Sabine by Alexander & Co. The note is printed on the verso of a railroad bond. Ornate designs decorate the left and right borders of the note. The number ''2'' is printed in the center of the left border; the phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' is printed within the right. The abbreviation ''No.'' is printed within an oval design in the upper-left corner; the number ''226'' is handwritten within. The amount ''$2 00.'' appears in the upper-right corner in an oval design. The phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' appears across the face of the note in a wave design; the phrase ''2 TWO DOLLARS'' is printed beneath. The phrase ''TWO DOLLARS'' is overprinted in green ink towards the bottom of the note. A lacy red overprint decorates much of the note, and the word ''TWO'' is faintly printed in red ink as well. The month and day are handwritten in the lower-left corner; the year, 1862, is printed adjacent to them. The following imprint appears beneath the year: Texas Printing House, Houston--E. W. Cave. The signature on the recto in the lower-right corner is illegible. The business ''Alexander & Co.'' was owned by Charles H. Alexander, who by 1857 was the largest merchant and cotton broker in Jefferson County (Chapter VIII: A History of Jefferson County, Texas: Personal Glimpses by W. T. Block). In addition, Alexander owned steamers and blockade-running schooners that operated during the years of the Confederacy (Ibid.). BC-475.[illegible

    Alexander & Co. $1.00 (one dollar) private scrip

    No full text
    This private scrip was issued in Sabine by Alexander & Co. Ornate designs decorate the left and right borders of the note. The number ''1'' is printed in the center of the left border; the phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' is printed within the right. The number'' 1'' is printed within a circle design in the upper-left and -right corners; the phrase ''ONE DOLLAR'' appears above each circle. The phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' appears across the face of the note in a wave design. The phrase ''1 ONE'' is overprinted in green ink across the center of the note. The month, day, and last digit of the year are handwritten; the first three digits of the year, 186, are printed adjacent to them. The following imprint appears beneath the date in the lower-left corner of the note: Texas Printing House, Houston--E. W. Cave. The signature on the recto in the lower-right corner is illegible. The business ''Alexander & Co.'' was owned by Charles H. Alexander, who by 1857 was the largest merchant and cotton broker in Jefferson County (Chapter VIII: A History of Jefferson County, Texas: Personal Glimpses by W. T. Block). In addition, Alexander owned steamers and blockade-running schooners that operated during the years of the Confederacy (Ibid.). BC-474.[illegible

    Alexander & Co. $5.00 (five dollars) private scrip

    No full text
    This private scrip was issued in Sabine by Alexander & Co. Ornate designs decorate the left and right borders of the note. The number ''5'' is printed in the center of the left border; the phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' is printed within the right. The abbreviation ''No.'' is printed within an oval design in the upper-left corner; the number ''104'' is handwritten within it. The amount ''$5 00.'' appears in the upper-right corner in an oval design. The phrase ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' appears across the face of the note in a wave design; the phrase ''V FIVE DOLLARS'' is printed beneath. The phrase ''FIVE DOLLARS'' is overprinted in green ink towards the bottom of the note. A lacy red overprint decorates much of the note, and the word ''FIVE'' is faintly printed in red ink as well. The month and day are handwritten in the lower-left corner; the year, 1862, is printed adjacent to them. The following imprint appears beneath the year: Texas Printing House, Houston--E. W. Cave. The signature on the recto in the lower-right corner is illegible. The business ''Alexander & Co.'' was owned by Charles H. Alexander, who by 1857 was the largest merchant and cotton broker in Jefferson County (Chapter VIII: A History of Jefferson County, Texas: Personal Glimpses by W. T. Block). In addition, Alexander owned steamers and blockade-running schooners that operated during the years of the Confederacy (Ibid.).[illegible

    On convergence of the maximum block improvement method

    No full text
    Abstract. The MBI (maximum block improvement) method is a greedy approach to solving optimization problems where the decision variables can be grouped into a finite number of blocks. Assuming that optimizing over one block of variables while fixing all others is relatively easy, the MBI method updates the block of variables corresponding to the maximally improving block at each iteration, which is arguably a most natural and simple process to tackle block-structured problems with great potentials for engineering applications. In this paper we establish global and local linear convergence results for this method. The global convergence is established under the Lojasiewicz inequality assumption, while the local analysis invokes second-order assumptions. We study in particular the tensor optimization model with spherical constraints. Conditions for linear convergence of the famous power method for computing the maximum eigenvalue of a matrix follow in this framework as a special case. The condition is interpreted in various other forms for the rank-one tensor optimization model under spherical constraints. Numerical experiments are shown to support the convergence property of the MBI method

    Locally Decodable/Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions

    No full text
    Recent efforts in coding theory have focused on building codes for insertions and deletions, called insdel codes, with optimal trade-offs between their redundancy and their error-correction capabilities, as well as efficient encoding and decoding algorithms. In many applications, polynomial running time may still be prohibitively expensive, which has motivated the study of codes with super-efficient decoding algorithms. These have led to the well-studied notions of Locally Decodable Codes (LDCs) and Locally Correctable Codes (LCCs). Inspired by these notions, Ostrovsky and Paskin-Cherniavsky (Information Theoretic Security, 2015) generalized Hamming LDCs to insertions and deletions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the only known results that study the analogues of Hamming LDCs in channels performing insertions and deletions. Here we continue the study of insdel codes that admit local algorithms. Specifically, we reprove the results of Ostrovsky and Paskin-Cherniavsky for insdel LDCs using a different set of techniques. We also observe that the techniques extend to constructions of LCCs. Specifically, we obtain insdel LDCs and LCCs from their Hamming LDCs and LCCs analogues, respectively. The rate and error-correction capability blow up only by a constant factor, while the query complexity blows up by a poly log factor in the block length. Since insdel locally decodable/correctble codes are scarcely studied in the literature, we believe our results and techniques may lead to further research. In particular, we conjecture that constant-query insdel LDCs/LCCs do not exist

    Alexander & Co. 25 cents (twenty-five cents) private scrip

    No full text
    This private scrip was issued in Sabine by Alexander & Co. It is printed on the verso of a bond. A decorative design borders the left edge of the note. The phrase ''25 CENTS.'' is printed within the design. The abbreviation ''No.'' is printed in the upper left-corner in an ornate rectangle; the number ''124'' is handwritten within. The amount ''25 Cts.'' is printed in the upper-right corner in the same rectangle-style design. The name ''ALEXANDER & CO.'' is printed across the face of the note. The phrase ''TWENTY-FIVE CENTS'' appears beneath. The month and day are handwritten; the year, 1862, is printed adjacent to them. The following imprint appears beneath the date in the lower-left corner of the note: Texas Pr. House, Houston--E W Cave. The signature on the recto in the lower-right corner is illegible. The business ''Alexander & Co.'' was owned by Charles H. Alexander, who by 1857 was the largest merchant and cotton broker in Jefferson County (Chapter VIII: A History of Jefferson County, Texas: Personal Glimpses by W. T. Block). In addition, Alexander owned steamers and blockade-running schooners that operated during the years of the Confederacy (Ibid.). BC-472.[illegible
    corecore