1,720,965 research outputs found

    Medicina antica e tardoantica. Rassegna degli studi e complementi bibliografici (anni 2020-2023)

    No full text
    Rassegna degli studi che nel triennio tra il 2020 e il 2023 sono stati dedicati alla medicina antica e tardoantica e alla sua ricezione

    Burgundio da Pisa e la resa delle metafore nei trattati galenici sulle pulsazioni

    No full text
    Il saggio esamina le rese e la fortuna delle denominazioni metaforiche di alcuni tipi di polsi nei trattati galenici sulle pulsazioni tradotti da Burgundio da Pisa nel XII secolo, per verificare la presenza di una ripresa da parte del traduttore di usi linguistici in vigore e la possibile introduzione di innovazioni lessicali a partire dal suo lavoro

    Le traduzioni de pulsibus nella trasmissione universitaria del Galeno latino

    No full text
    Una panoramica della trasmissione del Galeno latino sul polso negli ambienti universitari medievali attraverso un esame delle testimonianze accademiche e dei testimoni manoscritti

    Una compilazione altomedievale: il Non omnes quidem e i Gynaecia di Mustione

    No full text
    Gynaecia by Mustio, a successful Latin re-elaboration of Gynaecia by Soranus, are preserved in eighteen manuscripts, two translations and three epitomes. The first epitome, known as Non omnes quidem, descends from a manuscript of the branch of the ms. Laur. plut. 73.1, but is earlier than that and occasionally provides improvements to Gynaecia by Mustio. This text is altered by the epitomizer through omissions, mergings and interpolations, including twenty-one additamenta, mostly from the fourth book of Ad Eunapium by Oribasius and the fifth and sixth books from a gynaecologic compilation transmitted in ms. Laur. plut. 73.1. This article deals with the relation between the manuscript tradition of the Gynaecia and that of its abridgement Non omnes quidem and the working methods of the compiler

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore