1,720,983 research outputs found
Acute Cholecystitis: Diagnostic Pitfall and Timing of Treatment
Objective: Cholelithiasis represents a very frequent health problem with higher prevalence in developed countries. The aim of this chapter is to underline, also by submitting our surgical experience, some diagnostic deceptions and the timing of treatment.
Methods: The presentation of 42 patients admitted in our institution (September 2012/September 2014) with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis allows to identify two different clinical forms of acute biliary pancreatitis: the pancreatic pattern and biliary pattern. Moreover, the evaluation of another 42 patients observed in our institution (September 2014/September 2016) with acute cholecystitis should show our treatment program. Also, we added the analysis of our previous research, regarding acute cholecystitis, already published: difficult cholecystectomy, antegrade dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, postoperative morbidity, laparoscopic approach in cirrhotics, finally the robotic experience.
Results: Clinical features, laboratory, and imaging exams should identify, into acute biliary pancreatitis, two clinical forms as biliary pattern and pancreatic pattern for different therapeutic approach. The treatment chosen for acute cholecystitis is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24–72 hours. Severe, complicated acute cholecystitis can require urgent surgical intervention.
Conclusion: Acute cholecystitis encompasses clinical forms with various degree of severity and several clinical courses. The treatment is focused on early cholecystectomy with various and different management strategies, suitable to the specific pathological conditions
Haemostasis in Thyroid Surgery: CollagenFibrinogen-Thrombin Patch (CFTP) Versus Cellulose Gauze. Our Experience.
Purpose: Postoperative hemorrhage is fortunately uncommon but potentially life threatening complication of thyroid surgery that increases the postoperative morbidity and the hospital stay. In this study we compare the efficacy of collagen patch coated with human fibrinogen and human thrombin (CFTP) (group C) and oxidized regenerated cellulose gauze (group B) versus traditional hemostatic procedures (group A) in thyroid surgery. Methods: From January 2011 to December 2013, 226 were eligible for our prospective, non-randomized, comparative study. Patients requiring a video-assis ted thyroidectomy, without drain or near total or hemithyroidectomy were excluded. Others exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of malignancy, substernal goiter, disorders of hemostasis or coagulation and Graves’ or hyper-functioning thyroid diseases. Outcomes included duration of operation, drainage volume post-operative complications. Results: Our results show a significant reduction in drainage volume in the group C in comparison with the others two groups. In the group C there were no bleedings but the limited numbers don’t make significant this result. There were no differences in terms of other complications, except for the incidence of seroma in group B. Conclusion: the use of CFTP reduces the drainage volume potentially the bleeding complications and the hospital stay. These findings confirm the efficacy of CFTP, encouraging its use in thyroid surgery
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
