24 research outputs found
KULDESAK STUDI KEWARGANEGARAAN
Full text linkCivics is one study of political science. As long long ago it was adapted from law program in PTPG in Indonesia. The exposure of juridical program is so dominant that needs adoption political science approach in civics studies. As the civics program is demanded to produce teachers at school, that material not only civics but also learning method is really needed to form crative, innovative, and responsible pedagogue cempentenc
KULDESAK STUDI KEWARGANEGARAAN
No full textCivics is one study of political science. As long long ago it was adapted from law program in PTPG in Indonesia. The exposure of juridical program is so dominant that needs adoption political science approach in civics studies. As the civics program is demanded to produce teachers at school, that material not only civics but also learning method is really needed to form crative, innovative, and responsible pedagogue cempentenc
PEMILU 2009 DAN PERUBAHAN KONSTELASI PARTAI POLITIK: PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN
No full textChange the constellation of political parties in the election of 2009 is not something real, because the high level of white groups as well as an electoral system that makes inflating the number of seats actually. The existence of citizens who are not registered and are not facilitated through an existing election mechanism violations of citizen rights. Phenomenon in the formation of coalition government between the parties and the winner of the defeated party will hurt the citizens because of the lack of alternative options on the next election, because all parties in the government coalition eventually. This means that the Election of 2009 does not reflect participation, but rather mobilization
Analysis of Attitude Assessment Instrument in Pancasila and Citizenship Education Student Textbook for Tenth Grade
No full textSTRATEGI PENGUATAN DEMOKRASI AGONISTIK PADA BADAN EKSEKUTIF MAHASISWA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN (STUDI PADA BEM FKIP UNS)
No full textPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) Mendeskripsikan strategi untuk menguatkan demokrasi agonistik mahasiswa dalam lingkungan BEM FKIP UNS; (2) Mendeskripsikan hasil dari penguatan demokrasi agonistik terhadap kualitas demokrasi di lingkungan BEM FKIP UNS dalam perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara mendalam, observasi, serta analisis dokumen. Pengambilan subjek penelitian menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Lokasi penelitian pada BEM FKIP UNS Kabinet Alterasi 2023. Pengujian validitas data menggunakan triangulasi sumber dan triangulasi metode. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah sebagai berikut. Pertama, BEM FKIP UNS melaksanakan penguatan demokrasi agonistik melalui kegiatan yang diselenggarakan oleh organisasi tersebut seperti Rapat Harian Terbatas (RHT), pembinaan di masing-masing kementerian, LKMM-D, dan kegiatan kepanitiaan, bentuk penguatan yang dilakukan adalah dengan menciptakan kontestasi dan perdebatan yang sehat, menciptakan kebebasan dan kesetaraan dalam berpendapat, serta adanya kepastian terhadap pluralisme. Kedua, hasil dari penguatan demokrasi agonistik terhadap kualitas demokrasi di lingkungan BEM FKIP UNS yaitu dapat meningkatkan partisipasi aktif dari anggota dan pengurus organisasi, menumbuhkan kemampuan untuk mengelola konflik secara melembaga, dan mampu bersikap terbuka terhadap adanya perbedaan dan menjunjung tinggi nilai toleransi dimana hal ini menunjukkan adanya keterampilan kewarganegaran dan sikap kewarganegaraan dalam diri anggota dan pengurus BEM FKIP UNS
PENGARUH MODEL MASTERY LEARNING TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KOMPETENSI DASAR MENGAKTUALISASIKAN KEMERDEKAAN MENGEMUKAKAN PENDAPAT SECARA BEBAS DAN BERTANGGUNG JAWAB
Full text linkThis research aimed to find out whether or not there was an effect of mastery learning model on the mastery of basic competency “actualizing the freedom of expressing opinion independently and responsibly” in the 7th grade of SMP Negeri 14 Surakarta.This study was an experimental quantitative research. The population of research was the 7th graders of SMP Negeri 14 Surakarta in the school year of 2015/2016. The sampling technique used was simple random sampling one. The sample of research consisted of 62 students: 31 in experiment and 31 in control groups. The instruments of collecting data used in this research were questionnaire, observation sheet and documentation. The validation of questionnaire of basic competency “actualizing the freedom of expressing opinion independently and responsibly” was carried out using validity and reliability test. The validity used was construct validity. Meanwhile, to validate the items of questionnaire, Pearson’s product moment correlational formula was used. Meanwhile, the reliability test used in this study was alpha formula. Technique of analyzing data used was one-predictor regression analysis technique. Considering the result of research conducted, there was a significant effect of Mastery Learning (X) application on the mastery of basic competency “actualizing the freedom of expressing opinion independently and responsibly” (Y). From the result of data analysis, it could be found rxy value = 0.980 with N = 31 at significance level of 5% and rtable = 0.355. Thus rstatistic (0.980) ≥ rtable (0.355), so that it could be concluded that there was an effect of X on Y variables. The contribution of Mastery Learning model to the mastery of basic competency “actualizing the freedom of expressing opinion independently and responsibly” was 91%. Thus, it could be concluded that there was a significant effect of Mastery Learning model application on the mastery of basic competency “actualizing the freedom of expressing opinion independently and responsibly” in the 7th grade of SMP Negeri 14 Surakarta in the school year of 2015/201
Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Debat Aktif untuk Membangun Sikap Demokratis Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila
Full text linkPenelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) ini meneliti penerapan metode debat aktif untuk membangun sikap demokratis siswa dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di SMAN 2 Boyolali. Penelitian dua siklus ini melibatkan siswa kelas XI-7 dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumen, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian membuktikan keefektifan metode debat aktif. Rata-rata sikap demokratis siswa meningkat signifikan dari 50% pada pra-siklus menjadi 62,5% pada siklus pertama lalu 87,5% pada siklus 2, dengan indikator toleransi terhadap perbedaan mencapai 100%. Partisipasi siswa juga naik dari 68,75% menjadi 93,75%. Peningkatan ini didukung oleh pendekatan terstruktur, pengalaman belajar nyata, dan peran guru sebagai fasilitator. Tantangan seperti ketimpangan partisipasi dan manajemen waktu berhasil diatasi melalui pelatihan debat, pembagian peran, dan evaluasi berbasis umpan balik. Kesimpulannya, debat aktif efektif membentuk sikap demokratis ketika didukung perencanaan matang, topik kontekstual, dan lingkungan inklusif. Implikasinya, guru disarankan mengadopsi metode interaktif ini untuk menciptakan pembelajaran yang partisipatif. Penelitian lanjutan dapat mengembangkan modul debat berbasis isu lokal agar pendidikan demokrasi tidak hanya teoritis tetapi juga melatih keterampilan sosial siswa sebagai warga negara.
ReferensiAbdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Syakir Media Press.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Arends, R. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bernadetta, S., dkk. (2021). Action research in education: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Hattie, J. (2009). *Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement*. Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Interaction Book Company.Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran pendidikan Pancasila fase F. Kemendikbud.Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Pedoman implementasi kurikulum merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.
Lie, A., dkk. (2020). Debate pedagogy in Asian contexts. Springer.
Majid, A., & Rochman, C. (2020). Pembelajaran interaktif: Teori dan praktik. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Murdiyana, E. (2020). Validitas data penelitian kualitatif. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Nurdin, E. S. (2022). Model debat aktif dalam pembelajaran. Prenadamedia Group.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2021). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer.
Sapriya. (2012). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan: Konsep dan pembelajaran. Rosda.
Sapriya. (2019). Pendidikan nilai dalam pembelajaran PKn. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Suharsimi, A. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zamroni. (2017). Dinamika pendidikan karakter. UNY Press
Infisdial as Learning Media for Strengthening "Anti Bullying" Attitudes
Full text linkBullying is increasingly common in Indonesia, especially in school environments. Teachers have a very important contribution to overcoming bullying behavior towards students, one of which is by providing interesting but still effective learning to transform knowledge and information as well as life values through learning at school. The learning process can be carried out using learning media. The aim of this research is to develop infographic-based learning media through social media that can strengthen students' anti-bullying attitudes. This development uses the ADDIE model. This study involving material experts and media experts, as well as Pancasila Education subject teachers and 30 Phase E students as research subjects. Data collection was carried out using questionnaires and interviews. At the validation stage, the material expert received the "Very good" category. The results of the Independent Sample T-test were interpreted to show that the calculated t value was greater than the t table so that it could be concluded that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted with the test decision being that the experimental class mean was greater than the control class. This shows that treatment using informal media has a significant impact on strengthening the value of anti-bullying attitudes in students
Strengthening Civic Literacy Using Psycho Pedagogical Development Approach in Politics of Defence Class: Lesson from Indonesia
No full text
