1,720,956 research outputs found
Armenians in Kamieniec Podolski in the last quarter of the 17th century − an attempt to reconstruct the census records
No full textBy examining the manuscript sources created by Armenian community in Kamieniec Podolski (Kamianets-Podilskyi), Jazłowiec (Yazlovets), Lwów (Lviv) and Stanisławów (now: Ivano-Frankivsk), the author reconstructs the names and surnames of Armenians who lived in Kamieniec Podolski before the Turkish invasion of 1672 and those who resided there immediately after 1700
Kamieniec Armenians in the last quarter of the 17th century : supplementation of the name list on the basis of subsequent sources
No full textThe author uses subsequent historical sources to supplement the data about Armenians living in Kamieniec Podolski (Kamianets-Podilskyi) before the Turkish invasion in 1672 and soon after regaining the town by Poland in 1700. These sources include: book of the Armenian court of Kamieniec Podolski from 1651-1663; registers of church apparatus taken away from Kamieniec and their gradual sales; Turkish censuses of the people of Kamieniec Podolski, including Armenians, from 1681
Մոնիկա Ագոպսովիչ, Լվովի պատանդները թուրքական գերության մեջ : 1672-1679 թթ
No full textPo zdobyciu Kamieńca Podolskiego pod koniec sierpnia 1672 roku armia turecka ruszyła na Lwów i zaczęła go oblegać we wrześniu. Warunkiem odstąpienia od miasta była wypłata okupu w wysokości 80 tysięcy talarów. Zebrano tylko
5 tysięcy, a za brakującą resztę zgodzono się na przekazanie pod zastaw jedenastu zakładników, wśród nich dwóch Ormian. Podejmowane potem wysiłki sprawiły, że Ormian zwolniono w 1676 roku, pozostałych – dopiero w 1679 roku. Autorka stara się uporządkować wątek zakładników lwowskich wielokrotnie wspominany w materiale źródłowym – rozproszonym i zawierającym wiele sprzeczności, zwłaszcza gdy chodzi o ich nazwiska, a także losy.After capturing Kamieniec Podolski [Kamianets-Podilskyi] in late August 1672, Ottoman army moved towards Lwów [Lviv] and started its siege in September. The condition for withdrawing from the siege was a ransom of eighty thousand
talers. Only five thousand was collected, and the missing amount was compensated by agreeing to hand over eleven hostages, including two Armenians. Later efforts resulted in the release of the Armenian hostages in 1676, while the remaining ones were released only in 1679. The author attempts to organize the topic of Lwów hostages, frequently mentioned in source materials but scattered and containing many contradictions, especially regarding their names and fate.1672 թվականի օգոստոսի վերջին Կամիենեց-Պոդոլսկին գրավելուց հետո թուրքական բանակը շարժվեց դեպի Լվով և սեպտեմբերին սկսեց դրա շրջափակումը։ Քաղաքից հեռանալու պայմանը՝ ութսուն հազար թալարի փրկագնի վճարումն էր։ Հաջողվեց հավաքել ընդամենը հինգ հազար, իսկ մնացած գումարի դիմաց համաձայնություն ձեռք բերվեց փոխանցել տասնմեկ պատանդ, այդ թվում՝ երկու հայ։ Հետագա ջանքերի շնորհիվ, 1676 թվականին հայերը ազատ արձակվեցին, իսկ մնացած պատանդները՝ միայն 1679 թվականին։ Հեղինակը փորձում է համակարգել Լվովի պատանդների պատմական հետագիծը, որը բազմիցս հիշատակվում է թեմային առնչվող աղբյուրներում, լինելով սակայն չկարգավորված և պարունակելով բազմաթիվ հակասություններ, հատկապես երբ խոսքը վերաբերում է նրանց ազգանուններին ու ճակատագրին
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Historical Memorials of Polish Armenians” – a New Source Edition Series about Armenian Community in Poland
No full textA five-year-long research and editing project “Historical Memorials of Polish Armenians”, funded from “The National Programme for Development of Research in Humanities” of the Ministry of Education in Poland has been led by the Foundation of Culture and Heritage of Polish Armenians and headed by Krzysztof Stopka. Other people involved in the project are: Monika Agopsowicz, Armen Artwich, Andrzej Gliński, Tomasz Krzyżowski, Marcin Łukasz Majewski, Hripsime Mamikonyan, Tatevik Sargsyan, Edward Tryjarski, Franciszek Wasyl and Andrzej A. Zięba. The aim of the project is to edit and publish the sources contributive to the history of Armenians in Poland between the 14th and 18th centuries. The historical sources are to be translated from Kipchak, Armenian and Latin into Polish. Volumes 1 and 2 comprise of: Zapisy sądu duchownego Ormian miasta Lwowa za lata 1564-1608 (Records from the Spiritual Court of Lwów’s Armenians between 1564-1608), Metryka katedry ormiańskiej we Lwowie za lata 1635-1732 (Lwów Cathedral Baptism Records from 1635-1732) and Zbiórki pieniężne gminy Ormian lwowskich za lata 1598-1637 (Tax Collections of the Armenian Community in Lwów from 1598-1637); volume 3 is to include Travel Notes by Simeon Lehatsi (in Armenian), volume 4 is to include Chronology, or church yearbooks by Stepanos Roshka; volume 5 is to include a translation of A Journey to Poland and other countries where exiles from Ani live by Minas Bzhyshkyan. Volume 6 Nowy Aliszan (New Alishan) references the historical sources collection published in 1896 by Ghewond Alishan, however, volume 6 is a new critical edition with many documents of which Alishan was unaware
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
