1,721,090 research outputs found
Importance of non-technical skills: SACRED in advanced endoscopy
No full textTherapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy is increasingly diverse and complex. The concept of non-technical skills (NTS) is familiar to most and directly linked to performance, quality and safety outcomes in healthcare. In the realm of advanced endoscopy, NTS are more relevant than ever. Highly effective advanced endoscopy teams require key attributes, including the principles of selection, acceptance, complication, reconnaissance, envelopment and documentation (SACRED)—the sacred ‘art’ of high-performance endoscopy. This is particularly the case when considering the coordination required to lead a team in performing an intricate practical procedure associated with a higher risk for adverse events. Knowledge from surgical subspecialties and the aviation industry applies to advanced endoscopy, and suggests there is merit in enhancing the skills of the whole team rather than investing in the endoscopist alone. Additionally, the advanced endoscopy service should not be defined by, or limited to, the procedure within the endoscopy theatre. Instead, it should be considered as an overarching process that embraces the entire patient journey, starting from the moment of referral and encompassing postprocedural care
Impact of advanced endoscopy training on colonoscopy quality and efficiency
No full textAbstract Objectives Few reports have detailed improvements in the quality of colonoscopies with continuous training post‐fellowship completion. We examined the changes in colonoscopy performance among trainees during our advanced endoscopy training program. Methods Screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed by 11 trainees who participated in our 3‐year advanced endoscopy training program between April 2015 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Quality and efficiency metrics of colonoscopies were evaluated annually. Results Altogether, 297, 385, and 438 colonoscopies were enrolled in the first, second, and third training years, respectively. The mean insertion times were 8.6, 7.6, and 6.9 min in the first, second, and third training years, respectively, with significant improvement from the first to second year (p = 0.03) and from the first to third year (p < 0.01). The adenoma detection rate, proximal adenoma detection rate, and mean number of adenomas per patient exhibited a tendency to improve annually; however, the difference was not significant. Polypectomy efficiency was 10.5%, 11.2%, and 13.0%, with significant improvements from the first to third year (p < 0.01) and from the second to third year (p = 0.02). Insertion time and polypectomy efficiency showed significant improvements, especially among trainees experienced with <500 colonoscopies. Conclusions Through our advanced endoscopy training program, there has been an improvement in the quality and efficiency of colonoscopy for trainees who have completed their fellowships, particularly those with <500 colonoscopies
Advanced Endoscopy for Benign Esophageal Disease: A Review Focused on Non-Erosive Reflux Disease and Eosinophilic Esophagitis
No full textAdvanced endoscopy (AVE) techniques include image-enhanced endoscopy methods, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), and types of microscopic endoscopy, such as endocytoscopy. In the esophagus, AVE first showed diagnostic utility in the diagnosis of superficial esophageal cancer and was then applied to inflammatory disease. This review focuses on non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), which sometimes show no abnormal findings on standard white light endoscopy alone. Studies have demonstrated that advanced endoscopy, including NBI magnification endoscopy and endocytoscopy, improved the diagnostic performance of white-light endoscopy alone for NERD and EoE. In this review, we explain why advanced endoscopy is needed for the diagnosis of these esophageal inflammatory diseases, summarize the study results, and discuss future perspectives
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Minimum standards for training in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection among advanced endoscopy trainees
Full text linkBackground and study aims: Data on colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) training during advanced endoscopy fellowship remain limited. We aimed to determine the number of procedures required by an average advanced endoscopy trainee (AET) to achieve competence in cognitive and technical C-EMR skills.
Methods: AETs from advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) were graded on every C-EMR using a standardized assessment tool. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to generate individual and aggregate learning curves to estimate the minimum number of cases required to achieve competence for overall, technical, and cognitive components of C-EMR. AETs completed a self-assessment questionnaire on C-EMR competence at the end of their training.
Results: A total of 22 AETs among 16 AETPs participated in this study. Nineteen AETs (86%) reported formal training in C-EMR with a mean number of 32 ± 22 cases prior to their AETP. In aggregate, 637 C-EMRs were performed (median of 32 per AET; interquartile range 17-45). Learning curve analyses revealed substantial variability in minimum volume of procedures needed to attain competence across different C-EMR skills (range: 19-39). A minimum of 19 cases were required to achieve overall competence using the global assessment score. All AETs reported feeling comfortable performing C-EMR independently at the end of AETP, yet only three (14%) achieved competence in their overall performance.
Conclusions: The relatively low number of C-EMRs performed by many AETs may be insufficient to achieve competence. The estimated thresholds for an average AET to achieve competence in C-EMR provide a framework for AETPs in determining the minimal standards for case volume exposure during training
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
