130 research outputs found

    Adebiyi etal: absorption of shortwave radiation by North African dust

    No full text
    The codes and datasets contained here are for the paper with the information below Titled: "North African dust absorbs substantially less solar radiation than estimated by climate models and remote-sensing retrievals" Author: Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Yue Huang, Bjørn H. Samset and Jasper F. Kok Please see the ReadMe.txt for additional details. ------------------------ Corresponding Authors: Adeyemi Adebiyi Email: [email protected]; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California-Merced, 5200 North Lake Road Merced, CA 95343

    Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis – DustCOMM Version 1

    No full text
    Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis – DustCOMM Version 1 This is the version-1 of DustCOMM dataset (Adebiyi et al. Geoscientific Model Development), containing annual and seasonal climatologies of constrained dust aerosol properties, including spatially-varying dust size distribution, mass extinction efficiency, and atmospheric dust loading. Please be aware that there will be future versions of DustCOMM that incorporates more observational, modeling and experimental constraints. Please send an email to the corresponding authors if you have any question or would like to receive update of DustCOMM's future developments. Below, we give a brief description of each data file. In each, we have included the mean, median, 1 and 2 sigma uncertainty estimates as a function of location. These uncertainty estimates are derived from probability distributions that describe the field over each location. Please contact the corresponding authors if you are interested in the full dataset. The dimensions in these dataset are denoted as: lon [144]   -- Longitude. Unit of degrees_east. Global -  2.5 deg resolution. lat [96]    -- Latitude. Unit of degrees_north. Global - ~2 deg resolution lev [35]    -- Pressure levels. Unit of hPa. ~900 hPa to 100 hPa. Lower resolution in the boundary layer and higher resolution in the free troposphere. D [200]     -- Dust Geometric Diameter. Unit of microns. From 0.2-20 microns. nseas [4]   -- Seasons. They are DJF, MAM, JJA, and SON corresponding to December-January-February, March-April-May, June-July-August, and September-October-December respectively. -------- Dust_Size_Distr_dVdD_annual.nc      - Dimension: [lon, lat, lev, D] Dust_Size_Distr_dVdD_seasonal.nc    - Dimension: [nseas, lon, lat, lev, D] -- DustCOMM annual and seasonal climatologies of 3-D normalized dust (volume) size distribution. Fields include:   ->  dVdD_mean      -- Mean Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution   ->  dVdD_median    -- Median Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution   ->  dVdD_Pos1sig   -- +1 Sigma Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution   ->  dVdD_Neg1sig   -- -1 Sigma Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution   ->  dVdD_Pos2sig   -- +2 Sigma Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution   ->  dVdD_Neg2sig   -- -2 Sigma Normalized Dust Volume Size Distribution -------- Dust_3D_MEE_annual.nc      - Dimension: [lon, lat, lev] Dust_3D_MEE_seasonal.nc    - Dimension: [nseas, lon, lat, lev] -- DustCOMM annual and seasonal climatologies of 3-D dust mass extinction efficiency (m2/g). Fields include:   ->  MEE_mean      -- Mean Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_median    -- Median Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Pos1sig   -- +1 Sigma Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Neg1sig   -- -1 Sigma Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Pos2sig   -- +2 Sigma Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Neg2sig   -- -2 Sigma Dust 3D Mass Extinction Efficiency -------- Dust_2D_MEE_annual.nc      - Dimension: [lon, lat] Dust_2D_MEE_seasonal.nc    - Dimension: [nseas, lon, lat] -- DustCOMM annual and seasonal climatologies of 2-D dust mass extinction efficiency (m2/g). Fields include:   ->  MEE_mean      -- Mean Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_median    -- Median Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Pos1sig   -- +1 Sigma Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Neg1sig   -- -1 Sigma Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Pos2sig   -- +2 Sigma Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency   ->  MEE_Neg2sig   -- -2 Sigma Dust 2D Mass Extinction Efficiency -------- Dust_Load_annual.nc      - Dimension: [lon, lat] Dust_Load_seasonal.nc    - Dimension: [nseas, lon, lat] -- DustCOMM annual and seasonal climatologies of 2-D atmospheric dust loading (g/m2). Fields include:   ->  Load_mean      -- Mean Atmospheric Dust Loading   ->  Load_median    -- Median Atmospheric Dust Loading   ->  Load_Pos1sig   -- +1 Sigma Atmospheric Dust Loading   ->  Load_Neg1sig   -- -1 Sigma Atmospheric Dust Loading   ->  Load_Pos2sig   -- +2 Sigma Atmospheric Dust Loading   ->  Load_Neg2sig   -- -2 Sigma Atmospheric Dust Loading ========================== Correspondng Authors: Adeyemi Adebiyi and Jasper Kok Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA Email: [email protected] and [email protected]</p

    DustCOMM

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis &ndash; DustCOMM Version 1&lt;/p&gt

    Low Cloud Cover Sensitivity to Biomass-Burning Aerosols and Meteorology over the Southeast Atlantic

    No full text
    Abstract Shortwave-absorbing aerosols seasonally cover and interact with an expansive low-level cloud deck over the southeast Atlantic. Daily anomalies of the MODIS low cloud fraction, fine-mode aerosol optical depth (AODf), and six ERA-Interim meteorological parameters (lower-tropospheric stability, 800-hPa subsidence, 600-hPa specific humidity, 1000- and 800-hPa horizontal temperature advection, and 1000-hPa geopotential height) are constructed spanning July–October (2001–12). A standardized multiple linear regression, whereby the change in the low cloud fraction to each component’s variability is normalized by one standard deviation, facilitates comparison between the different variables. Most cloud–meteorology relationships follow expected behavior for stratocumulus clouds. Of interest is the low cloud–subsidence relationship, whereby increasing subsidence increases low cloud cover between 10° and 20°S but decreases it elsewhere. Increases in AODf increase cloudiness everywhere, independent of other meteorological predictors. The cloud–AODf effect is partially compensated by accompanying increases in the midtropospheric moisture, which is associated with decreases in low cloud cover. This suggests that the free-tropospheric moisture affects the low cloud deck primarily through longwave radiation rather than mixing. The low cloud cover is also more sensitive to aerosol when the vertical distance between the cloud and aerosol layer is relatively small, which is more likely to occur early in the biomass burning season and farther offshore. A parallel statistical analysis that does not include AODf finds altered relationships between the low cloud cover changes and meteorology that can be understood through the aerosol cross-correlations with the meteorological predictors. For example, the low cloud–stability relationship appears stronger if aerosols are not explicitly included.</jats:p

    The role of the southern African easterly jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments

    No full text
    The westward transport of biomass‐burning (BB) aerosols by mid‐tropospheric winds over the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus deck has long been recognized, but the coupling to the large‐scale circulation has yet to be investigated fully. This goal is furthered here using satellite observations and reanalysis datasets spanning 2001–2012, as well as 10 day forward trajectory calculations of satellite‐detected smoke emissions. The results highlight the important role of a mid‐tropospheric zonal wind maximum, the Southern African Easterly Jet (AEJ‐S), in transporting BB aerosol west off the African continent. The AEJ‐S, defined through daily‐mean 600 hPa easterly wind speeds exceeding 6 m s−1 between 5°S and 15°S and centred zonally on the coastline, is most pronounced during September–October. The AEJ‐S is part of a meridional circulation that is diabatically forced by the temperature–moisture gradient between the southern hot–dry and northern cool–moist convective structures over land. 45% of 24 264 total identified smoke trajectories exit the continent to its west between 5°S and 15°S. These thereafter follow three major pathways: northwestward (8%), directly westward (55%) and anticyclonically recirculated (37%). The AEJ‐S induces an upward motion directly below the jet that enhances prevailing updraughts over land, lifting emissions and transporting aerosols more efficiently over the southeast Atlantic. Offshore, the prevailing large‐scale mean subsidence is reduced, with an associated increase in the nearby cloud‐top heights and reduction in the nearby marine low‐level cloud fraction. Further from the jet, increased warm continental temperature advection at 800 hPa associated with the strengthened land‐based anticyclone decreases mean low‐level cloud heights. Westward‐moving 600 hPa winds at the northern edge of a land‐based anticyclone become the southern African easterly jet (AEJ‐S, blue contours, 6‐10 m/s) in September‐October. 10‐day smoke trajectories (red to yellow indicating age), for September of 2007, visualize shortwave‐absorbing aerosol transport from satellite‐detected fire emissions (fire‐counts in maroon) far offshore, over the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus deck (greyscale, cloud fractions of 0.5 to 1.0). We further examine the impact of the AEJ‐S's secondary circulation on the stratocumulus clouds and aerosol distribution

    Correction to: Adebiyi, Sulaimon Olanrewaju, Oyatoye, Emmanuel Olateju, Amole, Bilqis Bolanle “Improved Customer Churn and Retention Decision Management Using Operations Research Approach” Emering Markets Journal 6 (2): 12-21. 10.5195/emaj.2016.101

    Get PDF
    University affiliations for first author (Adebiyi, Sulaimon Olanrewaju) and third author (Amole, Bilqis Bolanle) were changed. The numbering for Literature Review section was changed from 1 to 2. Accordingly, numbering of all future (next) sections was adjusted. Corrections to figures and tables were made. Table 2.1 is now numbered 1, Figure 2.1 is numbered Figure 1, Figure 1 is numbered Figure 2, Table 4.1 is numbered Table 2, Figure 4.1 is numbered Figure 3, Table 4.2 is numbered Table 3 and Figure 4.2 is numbered Figure 4. A duplicated reference to Adeleke, A and Aminu S.A. (2012) on page 19 was removed. The original article can be found via the DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2016.10

    DustCOMM_v1 Input Dataset

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;This repository contains the input data for&nbsp; Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis &ndash; DustCOMM Version 1.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The DustCOMM code is publicly available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620556, while the DustCOMM output dataset is similarly available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620475&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Below, we give a brief description of each file:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;1.&nbsp; model_dust_concentration&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Simulated 3-D dust concentration (ug/m3) from 6 model simulations. This folder contains both annually-averaged and seasonally-averaged model simulations.&lt;br&gt; 2.&nbsp; model_dust_Vweight&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- 3-D model dust vertical weight used in DustCOME. This is calculated from the modeled dust concentration. This folder contains both annually-averaged and seasonally-averaged model simulations.&lt;br&gt; 3.&nbsp; DAOD_clim_reanalysis_all.nc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Constrained annually-averaged dust aerosol optical depth. See Adebiyi et al. Geoscientific Model Development for details&lt;br&gt; 4.&nbsp; DAOD_seas_reanalysis_all.nc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Constrained seasonally-averaged dust aerosol optical depth. See Adebiyi et al. Geoscientific Model Development for details&lt;br&gt; 5.&nbsp; DustCOMM_lat.nc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Latitude array used in DustCOMM. Dimension = 96.&lt;br&gt; 6.&nbsp; DustCOMM_lon.nc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Longitude array used in DustCOMM. Dimension = 144.&lt;br&gt; 7.&nbsp; DustCOMM_lev.nc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Altitude (hPa) array used in DustCOMM. Dimension = 48.&lt;br&gt; 8.&nbsp; Globally_averaged_dust_PSD.mat&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Constrained Globally-averaged dust size distribution from Kok et al, Nature Geoscience, 2017.&lt;br&gt; 9.&nbsp; Size_resolved_ext_eff.mat&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -- Constrained Globally-averaged dust extinction efficiency from Kok et al, Nature Geoscience, 2017.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you have any question, please email the [email protected].&lt;/p&gt

    Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance

    Get PDF
    Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accurately represent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors are partially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission in coarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysical properties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodology that yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We present an analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensemble of global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth. We then compare the inverse model results against independent measurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find that errors are reduced by approximately a factor of 2 relative to current model simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse model results show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere, most likely because both the model simulations and the observational constraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis, we find that the emission flux of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm (PM20) is approximately 5000 Tg yr−1, which is greater than most models account for. This larger PM20 dust flux is needed to match observational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarse dust. We obtain gridded datasets of dust emission, vertically integrated loading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet and dry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As our results indicate that this dataset is more accurate than current model simulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used to improve quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system.This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (grant nos. 1552519 and 1856389) and the Army Research Office (cooperative agreement number W911NF-20-2-0150). This research was further supported by the University of California President's Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to Adeyemi A. Adebiyi and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 708119 awarded to Samuel Albani and no. 789630 awarded to Martina Klose. Ramiro Checa-Garcia received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation grant 641816 (CRESCENDO). Akinori Ito received support from JSPS KAKENHI grant number 20H04329 and Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) grant number JPMXD0717935715 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. Peter R. Colarco and Adriana Rocha-Lima were supported by the NASA Atmospheric Composition: Modeling and Analysis Program (Richard Eckman, program manager) and the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) for computational resources. Yue Huang was supported by NASA grant 80NSSC19K1346 awarded under the Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST) program. Ron L. Miller and Vincenzo Obiso received support from the NASA Modeling, Analysis and Prediction Program (NNG14HH42I) along with the NASA EMIT project and the Earth Venture Instrument program with computational resources from the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS). Samuel Albani received funding from MIUR (Progetto Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022). Carlos Pérez García-Pando received support from the European Research Council (grant no. 773051, FRAGMENT), the EU H2020 project FORCES (grant no. 821205), the AXA Research Fund, and the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (RYC-2015-18690 and CGL2017-88911-R). Longlei Li received support from the NASA EMIT project and the Earth Venture – Instrument program (grant no. E678605). Yves Balkanski and Ramiro Checa-Garcia received funding from the PolEASIA ANR project under allocation ANR-15-CE04-0005.Peer Reviewed"Article signat per 20 autors/es: Jasper F. Kok, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R. Colarco, Douglas S. Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito, Martina Klose, Danny M. Leung, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Ron L. Miller, Vincenzo Obiso, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Adriana Rocha-Lima, Jessica S. Wan, and Chloe A. Whicker"Postprint (published version
    corecore