1,721,009 research outputs found
A cardinality-constrained robust approach for the Stochastic Surgical Case Assignment Problem.
No full text
Evaluating the Impact of the Level of Robustness in Operating Room Scheduling Problems
No full textManaging uncertainty in surgery times presents a critical challenge in operating room (OR) scheduling, as it can have a significant impact on patient care and hospital efficiency. Objectives: By incorporating robustness into the decision-making process, we can provide a more reliable and adaptive solution compared to traditional deterministic approaches. Materials and methods: In this paper, we consider a cardinality-constrained robust optimization model for OR scheduling, addressing uncertain surgery durations. By accounting for patient waiting times, urgency levels and delay penalties in the objective function, our model aims to optimise patient-centred outcomes while ensuring operational resilience. However, to achieve an appropriate balance between resilience and robustness cost, the robustness level must be carefully tuned. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the model’s performance, assessing its sensitivity to robustness levels and its ability to handle different uncertainty scenarios. Results: Our results show significant improvements in patient outcomes, including reduced waiting times, fewer missed surgeries and improved prioritisation of urgent cases. Key contributions of this research include an evaluation of the representativeness and performance of the patient-centred objective function, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of robustness parameters on OR scheduling performance, and insights into the impact of different robustness levels. Conclusions: This research offers healthcare providers a pathway to increase operational efficiency, improve patient satisfaction, and mitigate the negative effects of uncertainty in OR scheduling
A robust optimization approach for the Operating Room Planning Problem with uncertain surgery durations.
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A rolling horizon approach for planning surgery cases under uncertain surgery duration: deterministic versus robust solutions.
No full text
A rolling horizon framework for the OR planning under uncertain surgery duration: deterministic versus robust approach .
No full text- …
