1,721,063 research outputs found
Rede am dem Sarge des Herrn Actuarius Salzmann
Get PDFREDE AM DEM SARGE DES HERRN ACTUARIUS SALZMANN
Rede am dem Sarge des Herrn Actuarius Salzmann ([1])
Cover ( - )
Titelseite ([1])
Trauerrede ([3]
Grec 2233
No full textACTUARIUS (Joannes). De methodo medendi libri VINumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.Joannis Actuarii methodus medendi libri I-V. et index libri VIFontebl.-Reg. 2144
Grec 2232
No full textACTUARIUS (Joannes). De actionibus et affectibus spiritus animalis libri IIACTUARIUS (Joannes). De urinis libri VIIGALENUS. De medendi methodo libri XIVNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.(1) Joannis Actuarii de urinis libri I-II. et cæterorum fragmenta ; — (63) ejusdem de actionibus et affectibus spiritus animalis ejusque nutritione libri II ; — (88) Galeni de methodo medendi liber III., fine mutilusMedic.-Reg. 2824, 2
Grec 2235
No full textACTUARIUS (Joannes). De methodo medendi libri VISYMEON Sethus. FragmentaNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.(1) Joannis Actuarii de medicamentorum compositione liber V ; — (88) ejusdem de ratione medendi liber IV ; — (192) Symeonis Sethi excerpta de alimentorum facultatibusBaluze.-Reg. 2167, 2
Études sur les écrits inédits des anciens médecins grecs . Cinquième série XIIe-XIVe siècles. Jean Tzetzès. Nicolas Myrepsus. Jean Actuarius.
No full textGostomiris A.-G. Études sur les écrits inédits des anciens médecins grecs . Cinquième série XIIe-XIVe siècles. Jean Tzetzès. Nicolas Myrepsus. Jean Actuarius. In: Revue des Études Grecques, tome 10, fascicule 40,1897. pp. 405-445
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
