1,721,056 research outputs found

    Dipyridamole echocardiography as a useful and safe test in the assessment of coronary artery disease in the elderly

    No full text
    We prospectively studied the sensitivity, specificity, feasibility, and safety of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography, compared to exercise electrocardiography in 130 subjects (67 younger and 63 elderly patients) referred for angiographic evaluation of suspected or proven coronary artery disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of dipyridamole echocardiography were respectively 75.5%, 100%, and 88.0% in younger patients and 82.9%, 100%, and 79.4% in elderly patients (P = NS). The sensitivity of exercise electrocardiography was 72.7% in young and 66.6% in elderly patients (P = NS); specificity 66.0% vs 60.0% (P = NS); feasibility 83.6 vs 63.5 (P = 0.05). Forty-nine younger and 38 elderly patients performed both tests. Sensitivity of dipyridamole echocardiography compared to exercise electrocardiography was 76.2% vs 73.8% in young patients and 83.3% vs 70% in the older group (P = NS). The feasibility of the two tests was significantly different in the elderly group only (dipyridamole echocardiography 79.4% vs exercise electrocardiography 63.5%; P less than 0.01). The incidence of side effects during dipyridamole echocardiography was similar in the two groups, except for dyspnea which was observed in 20% of older and 5% of younger patients (P less than 0.05). Our data demonstrate that the dipyridamole test combined with echocardiographic monitoring of regional myocardial contractility may be considered a valid non-invasive method for evaluating coronary artery disease in the elderly and that this test is a satisfactory alternative to the exercise stress test

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Left ventricular diastolic filling in elderly hypertensive patients.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of mild to moderate hypertension and of LVH on diastolic filling and other Doppler indices in the elderly. DESIGN: Survey with a control group. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one hypertensives (34 men, 37 women) referred for echocardiograms and 32 age- and sex-matched normotensive volunteers. Thirty-six of the hypertensives had LVH; 34 did not. SETTING: Echocardiographic laboratory. MEASUREMENTS: M-mode, two-dimensional, and pulsed Doppler echocardiograms. A wide variety of Doppler-derived indices of diastolic function were assessed. RESULTS: All Doppler derived indices of left ventricular diastolic filling (peak E, peak A, their ratio, EF slope, time-velocity integrals, atrial filling fraction, and isovolumic relaxation time) were similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Elderly mild to moderate hypertensives with or without LVH have LV diastolic filling that is normal for age. The identification of pathological diastolic dysfunction requires comparison to age-matched controls, since aging, a major factor influencing diastolic filling, can mask the effect of hypertension

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore