148,708 research outputs found

    Letter from Charles T. Abbott to B. R. Colson

    Get PDF
    Letter from Charles T. Abbott to B. R. Colson. The one-page note is handwritten

    Joint press release Dr Chris Burns & Tony Abbott

    No full text
    Joint Press release Dr Chris Burns (Northern Territory Government) and Tony Abbott (Federal Government)Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT

    The moving plate capacitor paradox

    Get PDF
    B. R. Davis, D. Abbott and J. M. R. Parrondo

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Measurement of the differential γ +2b-jet cross section and the ratio σ(γ +2b-jets)/σ(γ +b-jet) in p¯p collisions at √ s = 1.96 TeV

    No full text
    We present the first measurements of the differential cross section dσ/dpγ T for the production of an isolated photon in association with at least two b-quark jets. The measurements consider photons with rapiditie

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore