186,169 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-cad-10.1177_00111287241242483 – Supplemental material for Missing the Mark? A Typology of Lethal and Non-Lethal Firearm Violence in the Netherlands
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-cad-10.1177_00111287241242483 for Missing the Mark? A Typology of Lethal and Non-Lethal Firearm Violence in the Netherlands by Katharina Krüsselmann, Pauline Aarten and Marieke Liem in Crime & Delinquency</p
The narrative of victimisation and de-radicalisation: An expert view
No full textWhile the study of victimology and radicalization mainly focuses on
those who suffered from terrorist attacks, this article explores the role
of victimological processes in deradicalization. Experts from different
international deradicalization initiatives were interviewed. Using the
narrative framework with its three key concepts—identity, emotion,
and culture—as set forth by Pemberton and Aarten in this issue, the
relationship between victimization and deradicalization is more
thoroughly examined. Key findings include the delicacy of the term
“victim” in radicals’ narrative identity, the power of narrative in
triggering and transmitting emotions, and the importance of a former
radical that acknowledges the narratives of the radical and offers
alternative narratives to their radicalized ideologies.</p
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
LNG-terminal nabij de Eemshaven
No full textDe doelstellingen van dit afstudeerwerk kunnen als volgt worden omschreven: - 1. het beoordelen van al diè aspekten, welke hebben meegewogen in de beslissing van de Regering en de Tweede Kamer der staten Generaal om de Eemshaven als aanlandingsplaats voor het LNG aan te wijzen; - 2. het vinden van een geschikte plaats om het LNG te verschepen, op te slaan en in gasvorm door te sturen; - 3. het bepalen van al die maatregelen en werken, welke nodig zullen zijn om de LNG - terminal zo veilig en efficient mogelijk te kunnen laten funktioneren.Constructieve WaterbouwkundeHydraulic EngineeringCivil Engineering and Geoscience
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
Author Rights and Scholarly Publishing
No full textOriginally posted at
http://blog.library.gsu.edu/2014/10/24/author-rights-and-scholarly-publishing/</p
- …
