1,721,835 research outputs found
Structural control on the flow and the accumulation of hydrocarbons in the carbonate rocks excavared in the central roman quarry near Lettomanoppello, Majella Mountain, Central Italy
No full textThis contribution reports the relationships among fractures invaded by hydrocarbons and fracture parameters such as length, aperture, orientation, and proximity to major faults in an outcropping carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir
Types, mechanisms, and distribution of the faults in platform carbonates along the leading edge of the Majella thrust sheet around Fara San Martino, Central Italy
No full textThis contribution reports on the dvelopment of kink bands associated to high nagle reverse faults at the leading edge of the Majella thrust anticline
A forgotten anti-turkish project of Ethnic Cleansing in the First Half of xvii Century
No full textSulla scorta dei manoscritti greci dell'archivio di Simancas si propone una reinterpretazione del progetto di invasione iberica della Grecia alla metà del xvii secol
Dual permeability structure of a large, basin-bounding, normal fault in platform carbonates, central Italy
No full textDeformation mechanisms and structura archietcture of the Venere fault, Fucino Basin, Italy
No full textArchitecture and deformation mechanism of a basin-bounding normal fault in Mesozoic platform carbonates, Central Italy
No full textDeformation Mechanisms, structural architecture, and petrophysical properties of a large normal fault in massive limestone, Fucino area, central Italy
No full textEvolution and architecture of a large, basin-bounding normal fault zone in Mesozoic platform carbonates of central Italy
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
