1,720,962 research outputs found
Patient satisfaction as an excellent track record in nonsurgical rejuvenation procedures
Patient satisfaction is the goal of most aesthetic procedures. The aim of this study is to analyse nonsurgical rejuvenation procedures in a private practice setting, over a period of 10 years, evaluating patients' compliance, satisfaction and maintenance of a good fiduciary link with the medical operator
Evaluation of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler for volume restoration
Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of volume loss or contour deficiency. Methods: This 6-month, open-label study recruited sixty adults aged 40–65 years with bilateral moderate to severe volume loss or contour deficiency (Facial Volume Loss Scale [FVLS] score: 2–5). Eligible subjects were treated at the baseline visit with an injection of hyaluronic acid gel in one or more of three facial subregions: the zygomatic malar region, the anteromedial cheek and nasolabial folds. Results: A significant improvement from baseline was observed in the FVLS score at each study visit up to 6 months post treatment (p < 0.0125 by Wilcoxon test). A significant improvement was also observed in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at each visit up to 6 months. The study showed that the GAIS score improved in 100% of subjects at month 3, while at the end of the study (month 6) the percentage of improved subjects decreased to 91. Treatment effect was maintained by 100% of subjects up to month 3, while 57% of subjects showed a persistence of effect up to month 6. Conclusions: Volume loss or contour deficiency may be safely and effectively corrected using the new dermal filler
Patient satisfaction as an excellent track record in nonsurgical rejuvenation procedures
Patient satisfaction is the goal of most aesthetic procedures. The aim of this study is to analyse nonsurgical rejuvenation procedures in a private practice setting, over a period of 10 years, evaluating patients' compliance, satisfaction and maintenance of a good fiduciary link with the medical operator
Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction using an ADM with smooth round implants. A prospective observational cohort study
Prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) is well established and used in candidates for nipple/skin-sparing mastectomies; it is based on many different matrices and a great variability in breast implant selection. We describe our experience and clinical outcomes using Braxon & REG; ADMs and smooth round breast implants. Females aged 18-80 years who underwent mastectomies with immediate prepectoral reconstruction between April 2019 and April 2021 were prospectively included. Complications were classified as mastectomy-related (hematoma, necrosis) or reconstruction-related (seroma, infection, red breast syndrome). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess correlation between complication rate and selected variables, which were analyzed per breast with Kruskal-Wallis H test. Fifty-eight patients (102 breasts) received 45 bilateral and 12 unilateral procedures. Drains collected 485.9 cc [range: 100-1260] and were removed 15.7 days [range: 6-29] postoperatively. We report 41 complications (40.2%): 33 mastectomy-related, 8 reconstruction-related. Reoperation occurred in 14 patients: 7 wound debridement and revisions under local anesthesia; and 7 explantation. Implant loss rate was 6.8%. Mastectomy and reconstruction complications were not correlated with any variable. In conclusion, we found prepectoral reconstruction with Braxon & REG; ADMs and smooth round implants to be associated with acceptable complication rates that are not influenced by any patient- or surgery-related factors. Drainage volume is comparable to other breast implant reconstructive techniques, but drains are left in place for longer.& COPY; 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
