1,721,055 research outputs found
Plasma extravasation through neuronal stimulation in human nasal mucosa in the setting of allergic rhinitis
No full text Sanico, Alvin M., Satsuki Atsuta, David Proud, and Alkis Togias. Plasma extravasation through neuronal stimulation in human nasal mucosa in the setting of allergic rhinitis. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(2): 537–543, 1998.—We have previously shown that capsaicin nasal challenge in subjects with allergic rhinitis produces a dose-dependent increase in the albumin content of nasal lavage fluids. In the present set of studies, we determined whether this observation represents plasma extravasation that is neuronally mediated. To evaluate whether glandular secretions contribute to the albumin increase in nasal lavage fluids, volunteers with allergic rhinitis were pretreated with atropine or placebo before capsaicin challenge. Atropine significantly reduced the volume of returned lavage fluids and their lysozyme content but increased their albumin and fibrinogen content. To assess the contribution of sensory nerve stimulation, subjects with allergic rhinitis were pretreated in a second study with lidocaine or placebo before capsaicin challenge. Lidocaine significantly attenuated the capsaicin-induced increases in the volume of nasal lavage fluids, as well as their lysozyme and albumin content. To rule out the possibility of a direct effect of lidocaine on blood vessels rather than on nerves, healthy subjects were pretreated in a third study with lidocaine or placebo before bradykinin nasal challenge. Lidocaine did not affect the bradykinin-induced increase in the albumin content of nasal fluids. We conclude that, in allergic rhinitis, high-dose capsaicin induces plasma extravasation in the human nose and that this effect is neuronally mediated. This provides more definitive evidence that neurogenic inflammation can occur in vivo in the human upper airway. </jats:p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
