1,720,963 research outputs found

    Chromogranin A and biochemical progression-free survival in prostate adenocarcinomas submitted to radical prostatectomy

    No full text
    The primary aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic role of elevated levels of chromogranin A (CgA) in terms of biochemical prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after radical prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate adenocarcinoma. Two hundred and sixty-four consecutive men with non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma submitted to RRP represented our population. In all cases, a blood sample for the determination of serum total PSA and CgA levels was obtained (RIA). Two different upper reference values for serum CgA levels were used: >60 and >90 ng/ml. The main end point of this study was biochemical (PSA) progression-free survival. In our population, 35.0% (91/264 cases) of cases presented a serum CgA level >60 ng/ml and only 6.4% (17/264) presented CgA >90 ng/ml. After RRP, during a mean follow-up of 64.59±26.34 months (median 60 months; range 12-120 months), 59 patients (22.3%) showed a biochemical (PSA) progression. Using 60 ng/ml as upper reference value for CgA, 10.4 and 45.0% of cases showed PSA progression after RRP in the group with preoperative CgA levels ≤60 and > 60 ng/ml respectively. The proportion of PSA progression-free survival was significantly lower in cases with preoperative CgA > 60 ng/ml than in cases with CgA ≤60 ng/ml (P<0.0001). In addition, at the multivariate analysis, preoperative serum CgA levels were confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for PSA progression after RRP. In non-metastatic prostate carcinomas, we described a significant prognostic role of CgA in terms of biochemical progression-free survival. © 2007 Society for Endocrinology

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore