3,730 research outputs found
Eumerus turcmenorum Paramonov 1927
No full textEumerus turcmenorum Paramonov, 1927 Figs 4–5, 22Published as part of Mutin, V. A. & Barkalov, A. V., 2018, New data on the hover-flies of the genus Eumerus (Diptera: Syrphidae) from Russia, pp. 11-20 in Far Eastern Entomologist 363 on page 18, DOI: 10.25221/fee.363.3, http://zenodo.org/record/716419
Apiocera vespera Paramonov 1953
No full text<i>Apiocera vespera</i> Paramonov 1953: 476. <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> A small, elongate, grey and black species. Proboscis 0.6 x length of fore tibia, flagellum 2 x longer than maximum width, costa ending at M veins, vein M3+CuA1 absent, M2 present, becoming pale towards wing margin. Abdomen black with distinctive narrow grey bands on the posterior margin of each tergites.</p> <p> <b>Note</b>: the diagnosis of this species, based on the single holotype specimen from Booanya Rock in Cape Arid National Park and Paramonov’s description, is provisional. The holotype specimen is now lacking a head, and Paramonov did not describe all the features of the head, in particular the antenna. Paramonov described the species as most closely related to <i>A. mackerrasi</i>, and his description of <i>A. vespera</i> compares it with <i>A. mackerrasi</i>. We have assumed that the diagnostic features of the head of this species that were not described by Paramonov are the same as <i>A. mackerrasi</i>. The distinctive grey bands on the abdominal tergites make the species easy to distinguish from all other species in the group.</p>Published as part of <i>Yeates, David K. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2013, Review of the Australian Apiocera minor Norris species-group (Diptera: Apioceridae) with a revised key to species, pp. 195-209 in Zootaxa 3680 (1)</i> on page 199, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3680.1.13, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/218744">http://zenodo.org/record/218744</a>
Platypygus turkmenorum Paramonov
No full textPlatypygus turkmenorum Paramonov (Fig. 23) Platypygus turkmenorum Paramonov, 1929: 145, 209. Engel, 1933: 127. Paramonov, 1934: 21. Liepa, 1969: 19. Hull, 1973: 262. Evenhuis, 1983: 491; 2002: 26. Zaitzev, 1989: 45. Material examined. Types: TURKMENISTAN: 1 male paratype / Typus Platypygus turkmenorum sp. nov. / Askhabad, Transcaspia, 21.IV. 26 / Paramonov leg./ Zool. Mus. Berlin (ZMHB). Notes on types. Paramonov (1929) originally described Platypygus turkmenorum based on 20 male specimens from “Aschabad, Transcaspia” [= Ashkabad, Turkmenistan] collected on 21 April 1926 by Paramonov. Paramonov (1929) stated “ Typus in meiner Sammlung” and there is a single specimen labeled “ Typus ” in SIZK, which contains Paramonov’s personal collection, so it is the holotype specimen. Of the original 20 specimens, only two (1 in ZMHB and 1 in SIZK) were located by Evenhuis (2002). We have not been able to trace the remaining 18 specimens. We were able to examine the specimen in ZMHB, which although it is labeled as “ Typus ” is a surviving paratype. The holotype in SIZK carries the labels “Ashkabad/ Transcaspia/ 21.IV. 26 / Paramonov leg./ Platypygus turkmenorum / Typus / Paramonov det. ” and is double mounted with a minuten (V. Korneyev, in litt. 25 July 2000). Diagnostic features. Frons yellow with V-shaped black mark near base of antennae; antennae completely black (Fig. 23 a); postgena normal without posterior extension; occiput black, upper part of occiput with long yellowish hairs (Fig. 23 d); mesonotum (Fig. 23 b) minutely hairy, yellow with large contiguous black pattern medially, mark extending anteriorly as stripe to anterior margin of mesonotum; postpronotal lobes and postalar calli yellow; lateral margins of mesonotum yellow; lateral black spot next to transverse suture coalesced with median pattern; black prescutellar area with large yellow oval spot; scutellum completely yellow; halter yellow; costa ends slightly beyond vein R 4 + 5; crossvein r-m at middle of cell dm (Fig. 23 c); legs yellow. Male genitalia. Due to the paucity of available specimens, we did not dissect the male paratype in ZMHB. Distribution. Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan. Remarks.. Females of this species are unknown.Published as part of Gharali, Babak, Evenhuis, Neal L. & Almeida, Jorge, 2013, World synopsis of described species of the genus Platypygus Loew (Diptera: Mythicomyiidae: Platypyginae), pp. 199-242 in Zootaxa 3745 (2) on pages 234-236, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/24854
Parageron Paramonov 1929
No full textGenus <i>Parageron</i> Paramonov, 1929 Type species <p> <i>Parageron orientalis</i> Paramonov, 1929 by monotypy.</p> Diagnosis <p> Rather delicate pale yellow species (<i>Par. erythraeus</i> darker), male eyes holoptic (or very narrowly separated in <i>Par. erythraeus</i>) with upper facets enlarged. The single feature differentiating this genus from all others in <i>Parageron</i> s. lat. is the presence of a round blackish (sometimes velvety) spot placed on the thoracic suture above the notopleuron (see TSS in Gibbs 2011: fig. 2).</p> Etymology <p> ‘Near <i>Geron</i> ’, referring to similarity with the genus <i>Geron</i> (from ‘Para’, ‘Παρά’ Greek prefix = ‘near’ and ‘ <i>geron</i> ’, from Greek ‘γέρων’ = ‘old man’).</p> Included species <p> <i>Parageron erythraeus</i> (Greathead, 1967)</p> <p> <i>Parageron lutescens</i> (Bezzi, 1925)</p> <p> <i>Parageron longilingua</i> sp. nov.</p> <p> <i>Parageron orientalis</i> Paramonov, 1929</p>Published as part of <i>Gibbs, David, 2023, A world review of the bee fly tribe Usiini (Diptera, Bombyliidae) - Part 3: Parageron Paramonov s. lat., pp. 1-162 in European Journal of Taxonomy 863 (1)</i> on page 35, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.863.2081, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7767958">http://zenodo.org/record/7767958</a>
The personal archive of S. Y. Paramonov as a source of research of biography and scientific activity of the scientist
No full textIn the article we have considered the formation history, structure and documentary composition of a personal archival fonds of a worldwide known Ukrainian scientist S. Y. Paramonov, which is the source base of his scientific biography research. In a publication we have presented documents from the personal S. Y. Paramonov’s fonds, which interprete the underinvestigated sides of his life and scientific activity, we have also listed in the publication Paramonov’s documents which are deposited in other fonds of the Institute of Archival Studies of V. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, more specifically in the fonds of the NAS of Ukraine corresponding member A. S. Lazarenko and of the Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of the NAS of Ukraine. The special attention is paid to the unpublished scientific research of S. Y. Paramonov «Chemogenesis - a new theory of evolution»
Walkeromyia Paramonov
No full textWalkeromyia Paramonov Walkeromyia Paramonov, 1934: 22. Type species: Anthrax lurida Walker, 1857, by original designation. The reduced fleshy proboscis and labellum, shortened ventral oral recess, wing venation and the bare katatergite in front of the haltere place this genus in the tribe Anthracini, subfamily Anthracinae (Hull 1973). Although Hull (1973) suggested that Walkeromyia should be placed within a separate tribe, Walkeromyini, it remains within Antracini. Walkeromyia differs from other Antracini in its long conical flagellomere and the lack of a hair tuft at the apex of antenna. Characteristics of the genus are the long dense band of slender black scales on the male hind legs, and the generally uniformly brownish yellow wings.Published as part of Ávalos-Hernández, Omar, Lucia, Mariano, Álvarez, Leopoldo J. & Abrahamovich, Alberto H., 2011, Walkeromya plumipes (Philippi) (Diptera: Bombyliidae), a parasitoid associated with carpenter bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopini) in Argentina, pp. 41-46 in Zootaxa 2935 on page 42, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20653
Merodon flavitibius Paramonov 1926
No full text<i>Merodon Flavitibius</i> Paramonov, 1926 <p> <i>Merodon isperensis</i> Hurkmans, 1993 (as subspecies of <i>M. aberrans</i>) <b>syn. n.</b></p> <p> “ <i>Merodon aberrans</i> Egg. var. <i>flavitibius</i> nova” Paramonow, 1926: 153.</p> <p> <i>Type locality</i>: Armenia. Original description was based on an unknown number of syntypes, two of them were located in the Paramonov’s collection (SIZK, examined): <i>Lectotype</i>: male with labels: [N 317], [Инаклю (= Inaklyu, modern Antarut village, 40.35N, 44.266667E, asl 1450 m) / Эчмиадз. у. (= Echmiadzin (modern Vagharshapat) District) / Эрив. г. (= Yerevan Region, <b>Armenia</b>) 17.vii.24.], [<i>Merodon aberrans</i> Eger / var. <i>flavitibius</i> / var. nov. ♂ Typus / Paramonov. d.] (SIZK). <i>Paralectotype</i>: female with labels: [N 318], [г. Карны-Ярых (KarnyMount Yarykh, = Mount Ara, 40.4056N 44.4522E, asl 2614 m) / Эчмиадз. у. / Эрив. г. (= Yerevan Region, <b>Armenia</b>) 26.vii.24.], [<i>Merodon</i> / <i>aberrans</i> Egg. / var. <i>flavitibius</i> / var. nov. ♀ Typus / Paramonov d.] (SIZK).</p> <p> <i>Note</i>. In the original description, only the type locality is given, namely “Patria: Armenia ”. The exact number of types is unknown, as it is not specified by the author of the species (Paramonow, 1926: 153). The types were considered lost (Liepa, 1969: 20; Hurkmans, 1993: 205). In Peck (1988: 166), taxon was given as subspecies <i>Merodon aberrans flavitibius</i> Paramanov (sic!), 1926, according to article 45g (II) ICZN (1985). Hurkmans (1993: 176) also left the subspecific rank for the taxon. He also erroneously indicated that Paramonov published the name with a subspecies status (ibid.). We designate here the male as the lectotype, and the female as the paralectotype.</p>Published as part of <i>Vujić, Ante, Radenković, Snežana, Tubić, Nataša Kočiš, Likov, Laura, Popov, Grigory, Rojo, Santos & Miličić, Marija, 2023, Integrative taxonomy of the Merodon aberrans (Diptera, Syrphidae) species group: distribution patterns and description of three new species, pp. 51-96 in Contributions to Zoology 92 (1)</i> on page 64, DOI: 10.1163/18759866-BJA10037, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8349804">http://zenodo.org/record/8349804</a>
Platypygus kurdorum Paramonov
No full textPlatypygus kurdorum Paramonov (Figs. 7, 8) Platypygus kurdorum Paramonov, 1929: 157. Paramonov, 1934: 19. Zaitzev, 1966: 139, 142; 1986: 816; 1989: 45; 1992: 80. Liepa, 1969: 18. Hull, 1973: 262. Rohlfien & Ewald, 1979: 223. Theodor, 1983: 33. Evenhuis, 1983: 477; 2002: 25. Koçak & Kemal, 2009: 49. Gharali et al., 2011: 27, 30. Platypygus kurdorum var. persicus Paramonov, 1934: 18. Liepa, 1969: 19. Hull, 1973: 262. Zaitzev & Kandybina, 1983: 32. Zaitzev, 1989: 45. Evenhuis, 2002: 25. Platypygus persicus Paramonov. Evenhuis, 1983: 484. Material examined. Types: TURKEY: 1 lectotype and 2 paralectotype females/ Russ. Kurdistan/ Kasikoporan/ E. König (SDEI). Non-types: IRAN: 13 females, 10 males, Ghazvin province, Barajin region, Barajin, 8 km North of Ghazvin City, N 36 ° 20 ' 50 ", E 50 °04' 15 ", 1512 m, 12 June 2008, sweeping on Anthemis sp. (Asteraceae) B. Gharali (TMUC, BPBM); 1 female, Kurdistan region, Navareh, N 35 ° 18 ', E 46 ° 53 ', 1936 m, 4 June 2012, L. Abdi (B.G. collection); 3 females, Keredj [= Karaj], 40 km W Tehran, 13–19 May 1936, Brandt (USNM); 1 male, 1 female, same data (KBIN); 1 female, Zagros Mountains, Cherûm, N 29 ° 35 ' 16 ", E 51 ° 26 ' 26 ", 1 April 1999, J.P. Borrie (J. Dils). ISRAEL: 1 male, 1 female, Keshet, 18 May 1983, F. Kaplan; 4 males, 10 females, 1 male + 1 female in copula, Ma’ale Adumin [Adumim], 12 April 1990, A. Freidberg; 2 females, Mishor Adummin [Adummim], 21 April 1992, A. Freidberg (all in TAU). JORDAN: 1 male, Wadi Sir near Amman, 20 April 1956, J. Kapperich (HNHM); 1 female, ruins near Umm Qeis [Qais], 4 September 1992, M. von Tschirnhaus (N.L. Evenhuis). SYRIA: 3 females, Mt. Hermon, 2000 m, 28 August 1972, A. Freidberg (TAU). Notes on types. Paramonov (1929) described Platypygus kurdorum based on 3 specimens from “Kasikoporan” (a town near in what is now Turkey near the Armenian border [40 °01'N, 43 ° 26 'E]) and deposited in SDEI. All three specimens were examined in this study and are in fair condition. Gharali et al. (2011) incorrectly assumed that one specimen in SDEI was a holotype and the other two were in Paramonov’s personal collection. In fact, all three specimens are in SDEI (two were out on loan) and since no such single specimen was ever selected by Paramonov to be a holotype, all are syntypes. Engel (1933: 123) examined the three type specimens and stated “ Type in der Sammlung des Deutsch. Entom. Institutes Berlin-Dahlem”. This statement could be considered a lectotype designation based on Article 74.5 of the ICZN Code; however, no specific specimen was selected so it is impossible to state which of the three was meant to be the type. To avoid confusion, we here select the best preserved of these three syntypes, a female specimen repined into a polyzote stage, as the lectotype female. It carries the following labels (Fig. 7 a): “RUSS. KURDISTAN/ KASIKOPORAN/ E. König” [printed]; “ 7987 ” [handwritten blue]; reverse has “ Holotypus ” [printed]; “ TYPUS ” [printed, crossed out]; “Coll. DEI / Eberswalde” [printed]; “Paramonov det. ” [printed]; “ LECTOTYPE / Platypygus / kurdorum / Paramonov” [handwritten]. The lectotype is pinned through the mesonotum and is missing both antennal flagellomeres, the left wing, and the tip of the proboscis. Eugen König was an insect dealer in St. Petersburg from 1886–1892 and an assistant curator in the Tiflis Museum in Georgia from 1893–1914. We have no information on how or when these specimens came into the hands of Paramonov but, although there is no date of collection of these specimens, given the information we have on König, they were no doubt collected before 1914, and most likely during the years König was in Tiflis. Platypygus kurdorum var. persicus by Paramonov (1934) was described based on 10 specimens collected in 1904 at a number of localities in Iran by Nikolai Alekseyevich Zarudny. All these specimens are deposited in ZIS. A specimen from “Gurzhir”, Loristan, Iran was selected by Zaitzev & Kandybina (1983) as lectotype male. Type material was not examined by us in this study and we follow the synonymy by Zaitzev (1989) of this name under P. kurdorum. Diagnostic features. Face yellow; frons yellow with variable black mark medially (Figs. 7 b, e); antennae black; occiput black except posteriorly projecting postgenal process yellow; pronotum yellow with black mark dorsomedially; mesonotum bare, with three dorsal black stripes, black spot laterally next to transverse suture (sometimes black spot coalesced with lateral stripes); lateral stripes extend from posterior margin of postpronotal lobes to postalar calli, median stripe extends from anterior margin of mesonotum to scutellum (Figs. 7 c, f); scutellum yellow; postpronotal lobes and postalar calli yellow; halter stem and knob yellow; pleura yellow except black spot on anepisternum just posterior to anterior spiracle (Fig. 7 d); black spot on anterodorsal corner of katepisternum and on upper margin of meron; r-m crossvein about the middle of cell dm, cell br longer than cell bm. Male genitalia (Figs. 8 a-d). In lateral view, epandrium trapezoid, longer than high, with two short and acute processes; gonocoxites fused, H-shaped, with some bristly hairs laterally, with two long plates; plates medially twisted; gonostyli clavate, hollowed apically, deeply inserted in gonocoxites; aedeagal bulb large, basal aedeagal apodeme narrow in dorsal view, subrectangular in lateral view, extending forward as long and apically tri-lobate process. Female genitalia (Figs. 8 e, f). Furca U-shaped, sclerotized, lateral arms strongly sclerotized; without sclerotization around genital orifice; common spermathecal duct very short, brown, sclerotized; each spermathecal duct divided into two sections, the basal section, transversely striated, long, broad, basally sclerotized; the apical section as narrow and smooth duct, without distinct sperm pump or valves; basal part of median spermathecal duct narrower than that of lateral ducts, without striation, straight basally, remainder twisted spirally, gradually broadened toward apex; apical ducts eight times narrower than basal ducts, about 0.7 times that of basal ducts in length; lateral spermathecal ducts (only a small part shown in the illustration) about 4 times median duct in width; spermathecal reservoirs pear-shaped, slightly curved at middle, with a small cap apically, cap with hardly visible short and dense canaliculi. Distribution. Iran, Israel (new record), Jordan (new record), Syria (new record), Turkey. Remarks. Gharali et al. (2011) reviewed the status of this species and, after checking one type specimen and recently collected material that matched it, they showed that the distribution of P. kurdorum at that time was known only from Iran and Turkey. We here extend its distribution into the Middle East with records from Israel, Syria, and Jordan. The single Navareh female collected from the west of Iran (Kurdistan region) listed above gives the possibility that this species may also occur in the neighboring Kurdistan region of Iraq.Published as part of Gharali, Babak, Evenhuis, Neal L. & Almeida, Jorge, 2013, World synopsis of described species of the genus Platypygus Loew (Diptera: Mythicomyiidae: Platypyginae), pp. 199-242 in Zootaxa 3745 (2) on pages 211-214, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/24854
Johnmannia tasmanica Paramonov
No full textJohnmannia tasmanica (Paramonov) (Figs 2, 6, 8) Eupsilocephala singula Mann, 1928: 159. Mannia tasmanica Paramonov, 1950: 526; Liepa, 1969: 12. Johnmannia tasmanica Irwin & Lyneborg, 1989: 357. Material Examined. AUSTRALIA: Tasmania. 1 Ψ (ANIC 29 003419), A. Simson (SAM); 1 Ψ (UQIC 040944) Holwell Gorge State Forest, 40 ° 15 ' 32 "S, 46 ° 46 ' 15 "E, 20.xii. 1998 – 9.i. 1999, Malaise trap across creek, J. & A. Skevington (UQIC); 1 Ψ (MEI 108917), Lake St. Clair [42 °04'S, 146 ° 10 'E], Dec. 1963, K.L. Taylor; 1 Ψ (ANIC 29 003418), Warra Long Term Ecological Research Site 106. Grid: 744282, LTIS 8211, [43 °04'S, 146 ° 40 'E], Malaise trap, 14.i 12.xii. 1998 (ANIC). Diagnosis. Wings (Fig. 6 I) with dark reddishbrown opaque triangular basal band; hyaline basomedially; triangulate very dark reddishbrown opaque line medially; apical half of wing dark brown, paler posteriorly, paler within cells. Frons (Fig. 6 H) without silver pruinescence, deep broad medial concavity without silver pruinescence. Face with dense, gold pruinescence laterally from antennae along inner eye margin, absent medially, broadening ventrally on gena covering anteriorly directed triangular flange of gena at base of compound eye. Occiput glossy black dorsally (Fig. 6 H). Scutum without lateral silver pruinescent stripes. Tarsomeres without basal orange band (Fig. 6 A). Female S 8 (Fig. 6 F) quadrate (1.1 x as long as wide). Redescription. Female (Fig. 6 A). Wing length: ca. 9.5–11 mm. Similar to Johnmannia powerae sp. nov., except: dark. Head. Ocellar triangle with 12–16 short, dark, setae; frons (Fig. 6 H) narrow (3.0 x width of median ocellus), deep broad medial concavity without silver pruinescence; lower frons with dark reddish brown to black callus, paler light brown medial line ventrally in paler specimens, fine line of matte redbrown pruinescence around base of antennae extending dorsally to surround interantennal groove. Face (Fig. 6 H) with dense, gold pruinescence laterally from antennae along inner eye margin, absent medially, broadening ventrally on gena. Occiput glabrous, glossy black dorsally (Fig. 6 H), indistinct row of dark postocular setae almost length of ocellar triangle from compound eye, dense, gold pruinescence laterally and medially, absent dorsally. Gena overlain with dense, gold pruinescence; laterally flattened, triangular flange of gena (Fig. 6 B) at base of compound eye distinct, anteriorly directed. Labellum reddishbrown to black. Antenna (Fig. 6 B, C) dark, short (antennae/head = 1.1), scape shorter than postpedicel (scape/postpedicel = 0.8), black; pedicel black; postpedicel longer than pedicel and scape combined (postpedicel/ pedicel = 5.4), black cylinder, with dense, reddishgold pruinescence. Thorax dark. Scutum reflective metallic dark blue, laterally dark reddishbrown to black, without silver pruinescence; postpronotum dark red to black; post alar callus dark reddishbrown to black. Lateral silver pruinescent stripes absent; indistinct gold pruinescence in suture between scutum and scutellum. Scutellum black, reflective metallic dark blue. Pleuron glossy with reddishgold pruinescence (Fig. 6 B) on extreme ventral margin of proepisternum and antepronotum, dorsal, ventral and posterior margin of anepisternum, katepisternum, and proepimeron, and anepimeron anteromedially. Less setation; fine black setae on postpronotum, proepisternum, and antepronotum; short fine setae on anepisternum posteriorly and dorsally, absent from katepisternum. Legs black; tarsomeres without basal orange band. Hind legs longer (Fig. 6 A) (hind femur/mid femur 1.2). Wing (Fig. 6 A, I) dark infuscation, dark reddishbrown opaque triangular basal band. Triangulate, very dark reddishbrown, opaque line between apex of Sc and R 1, extending to CuA 2 A 1 join, over mcu crossvein and CuA 2; over apex of bm and br, indistinct posteriorly. From this line on apical half of wing dark brown, paler posteriorly and within cells. Halter stem and knob dark reddishbrown to black. Abdomen dark, very dark reddishbrown to black. Genitalia: T 8 (Fig. 6 G); furca (Fig. 6 D); S 10 diamondshaped, narrowed posteriorly, rounded anteriorly; S 8 (Fig. 6 F) quadrate (1.1 x as long as wide), broadest apically; spermathecal duct join individual spermathecal sac duct less than length of furca from spermathecal sac duct join; spermathecal sac (Fig. 6 E) joining common spermathecal sac duct together at length of furca from anterior margin of furca; shorter ovoid median spermathecal sac (Fig. 6 E) (1.2 x length of furca) with shorter narrow tube (length of furca) to smaller oval lobe (1.4 x length of furca); pair of larger ovoid outer spermathecal sacs (Fig. 6 E) (2.0 x length of furca) with shorter narrow tube (length of furca) to smaller round lobe (1.5 x length of furca). Male. Unknown. Distribution. Tasmania. Comments. The Holotype and Paratype described by Paramonov and supposedly placed in the NMV (Liepa 1969; Paramonov 1950) have not been found, in any collection. The specimen ANIC 29 0 0 3419 collected by Simson (SAM) was used as a basis for a redescription of Eupsilocephala singula (Mann 1928) and was examined by Paramonov and noted in his description of tasmanica (Paramonov 1950). The identification of the species is not in question and therefore a neotype designation is unnecessary. The specimen from Holwell Gorge State Forest (UQIC 040944) has a distinct pruinescent patch ventrally on the apex of the mid femur (Fig. 6 J). Less distinct pruinescence is found in the same area on the other femora of the same specimen. This pruinescence was not observed on other Johnmannia.Published as part of Lambkin, Christine L., Recsei, Jacqueline M. & Yeates, David K., 2005, Systematic revision of Johnmannia Irwin and Lyneborg (Diptera: Therevidae): Atypical metallic stiletto flies from Australian mesic habitats, pp. 1-28 in Zootaxa 866 on pages 16-17, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17086
Comparison of text classification methods for the Ukrainian language
No full textIsaienkov Ya. Comparison of text classification methods for the Ukrainian language / Ya. Isaienkov, A. Paramonov // Інформаційні технології і автоматизація–2020 : зб. доп. XIII Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф., Одеса, 22–23 жовт. 2020 р. / Одес. нац. акад. харч. технологій, Інститут комп'ютерних систем і технологій «Індустрія 4.0» ім. П. М. Платонова ; орг. ком.: Б. В. Єгоров (голова) та ін. – Одеса, 2020. – P. 268–270 : tabl., fig. – Ref.: 3 tit.The paper describes the results of experiments series with machine learning models for the problem of classifying short texts in the Ukrainian language. The computer experiments with TF-IDF, SVM, LSTM, and BERT models are performed. To implement computer experiments the Python programming language using. The estimation of models for various training processes are adduced
- …
