1,722,956 research outputs found
Linked collectors and determiners for: Flora of Japan Specimen Database.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Flora of Japan Specimen Database". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe">https://bionomia.net/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe">https://gbif.org/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Linked collectors and determiners for: Flora of Japan Specimen Database.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Flora of Japan Specimen Database". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe">https://bionomia.net/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe">https://gbif.org/dataset/55dc4a73-87ed-4420-8513-a44cce3753fe</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Recommended from our members
Pollution prevention opportunity assessment for the Maintenance Engineering Department (Organization 8513).
Full text linkThis Pollution Prevention Opportunity Assessment (PPOA) was conducted for the Maintenance Engineering Department (85 13) in September and October of 2002. The primary purpose of this PPOA is to provide recommendations to assist 8513 in reducing the generation of waste and increasing the purchase of environmentally preferable products. This report contains a summary of the information collected, the analyses performed, and recommended options for implementation. The Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico Pollution Prevention Group will continue to work with 8513 to implement the recommendations
Summary of Senate bill 1094, as amended by LCO #8513 and #8619
No full text"June 7, 2013."; Summarizes Senate Bill 1094, as amended by LCO #8513 (Senate "A") and LCO #8619 (Senate "B"., making extensive changes in the state's gun laws.; Harvested from the web on 6/17/1
UH-60A Airloads Flight Test Program: Data Counter 8513
Full text linkThe data collection portion of the UH-60A Airloads Flight Test Program was conducted between July 1993 and February 1994. At the time, the UH-60A Airloads Program was the most comprehensive and data-rich rotorcraft flight test program that NASA and the U.S. Army had ever attempted. It was part of the Modern Technology Rotors Program, where several different rotors were tested in small- and full-scale wind tunnels combined with flight testing. The UH-60A portion of this program allowed for comparison between other tests performed and served as a scientific quality database for validating current and new computational and simulation models. The UH-60A flight test data was stored in a comprehensive, easily accessed database known as the Tilt Rotor Engineering Database System, or TRENDS. With over 30 years of rotor testing experience, NASA and the Armys goal of the Airloads Flight Test Program was to collect data for a wide range of operating conditions and provide an extensive amount of data to improve the understanding of rotors and validate and improve prediction codes. This report presents the entire archived data set from Counter 8513 (Run 85, point 13) from the UH-60A Airloads Flight Test Program. There were 1,078 total data set counters acquired and archived during 57 accumulated flight hours and 31 research flights. Over 900 counters were research flight data acquisition data points. Counter 8513 is a low-speed, level-flight test condition
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
