1,724,660 research outputs found
Linked collectors and determiners for: Fourteen new species of the genus Thubdora Park, 2018 (Lepidoptera Gelechioidea: Lecithoceridae) from Uganda, and three new combinations in Ptilothyris Walsingham, 1897 from DR Congo.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Fourteen new species of the genus Thubdora Park, 2018 (Lepidoptera Gelechioidea: Lecithoceridae) from Uganda, and three new combinations in Ptilothyris Walsingham, 1897 from DR Congo". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/4569c2ca-cbbb-49cb-8460-494916d5f3d8">https://bionomia.net/dataset/4569c2ca-cbbb-49cb-8460-494916d5f3d8</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/4569c2ca-cbbb-49cb-8460-494916d5f3d8">https://gbif.org/dataset/4569c2ca-cbbb-49cb-8460-494916d5f3d8</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Tinjauan Ulang Dinding Tanah Bertulang Geoforce Segmental Retaining Wall (gsrw) Jalan Tol Bangkinang-pangkalan Sta 64 Terhadap Persyaratan Sni 8460: 2017
No full textMSE walls are used among bridge abutments and wing walls, and are also used to stabilize slopes that have the potential to slide and retain soil on slopes that are close to vertical. The MSE Wall on the Bangkinang-Pangkalan Toll Road functions to retain the soil after the bridge abutments on the toll road. In this research, repeated observations and analysis were carried out on variations in anchorage length, tensile strength, typical spacing of reinforcement elements and stability against overturning forces based on SNI 8460:2017 Article 10.5 guidelines. SNI 8460:2017 is an SNI that specifies geotechnical and seismic design requirements to be applied to geotechnical works in Indonesia. With this, the MSE Wall built on the Bangkinang-Pangkalan Toll Road is expected to comply with SNI 8460:2017. The aim of this research is to review SNI 8460:2017 Article 10.5 and external stability against the overturning force of the UMK wall of the Bangkinang-Pangkalan STA 64 Toll Road.The method used in this research is reviewing MSE walls based on SNI 8460:2017 Article 10.5 guidelines, namely typical technical requirements for wall dimensions, face coverings and reinforcement as well as analysis of external stability, namely overturning. The method used in this research is reviewing MSE walls based on SNI 8460:2017 Article 10.5 guidelines, namely typical technical requirements for wall dimensions, face coverings and reinforcement as well as analysis of external stability, namely overturning. Based on the results of the review and analysis of this final project on MSE walls, SNI 8460:2017 Article 10.5 includes: The type of face covering used for the MSE wall structure is precast concrete panels with a length of 1.65 m, a height of 1.42 m and a thickness 0.19m The length of reinforcement indicated in SNI 8460:2017 article 10.5.4.1.1 is L ? 0.7 He and L must be ? 2.5 m in accordance with SNI requirements, obtained by L are 18 m, 10.5 m and 6 m with variations in length of reinforcement. Typical spacing for metallic tape used in MSE wall structures with SNI 8460: 2017 Article 10.5.4.1.1., for Sv is 0.72 m and Sh is 0.70 m meeting the requirements of SNI 8450 2017. Minimum immersion of the face covering (Dm) according to the requirements of SNI 8460:2017 is a shallow foundation, whereas in this study a deep foundation was used using bored piles so that Dm = 0. And there was no sieve analysis test for embankment material requirements in the reinforced zone because the embankments used granular or sirtu embankments. The planned design safety factor is safe and meets the requirements because it has an external stability value against rolling force > 2 of 17,99
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
