1,723,049 research outputs found
Evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with BL-8040, a novel CXCR4 antagonist.
No full text 88 Background: BL-8040 is a novel CXCR4 antagonist being developed for multiple oncology indications. Preclinical studies demonstrated that BL-8040 increases the number of immune cells in peripheral blood and promotes CD8+ T cell infiltration into orthotropic pancreatic mouse tumors, reducing tumor load. BL-8040 is being evaluated in a Phase 2a, multicenter, open label trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (the COMBAT study). Patients are undergoing a 5-day period of monotherapy in which they receive daily doses of BL-8040, followed by 21-day cycles in which patients receive one dose of pembrolizumab and 3 doses/week of BL-8040 until disease progression or discontinuation. To date, 32 patients have been enrolled. Methods: On Day 1 and Day 5, blood samples were taken at pre- and post-dosing, to evaluate peripheral immune cell subset frequency by flow cytometry. In addition, core biopsies were taken from liver metastases, where possible, to assess immune cell infiltration into tumors and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Results: Here we present interim PD biomarker data from the BL-8040 monotherapy portion of the trial. Flow cytometry shows that BL-8040 monotherapy caused an approximately two-fold reduction in frequency of peripheral T regulatory cells, but had no effect on the frequency of T cells, NKT cells or cell populations that contain B cells (CD3- CD56-). Additionally, BL-8040 remained bound to CXCR4 on peripheral immune cells throughout the period of monotherapy. Analysis of available biopsies (N = 7) shows an up to 15-fold increase in the CD3+ population, and up to two-fold increase of CD8+ cells, in the tumor periphery and TME of 43% (3/7) of the patients after five days of BL-8040 monotherapy compared to baseline. Conclusions: In summary, the PD biomarker results in humans support the proposed mechanism of action for BL-8040 that was based on preclinical mouse models. Analysis of tumor biopsies is ongoing, with an emphasis on investigating the effects of BL-8040 on tumor-resident immune cells and the TME. Clinical trial information: NCT02826486. </jats:p
CXCR4 antagonist (BL-8040) to enhance antitumor effects by increasing tumor infiltration of antigen-specific effector T-cells.
No full text 73 Background: C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) helps to retain the hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in the bone marrow (BM). CXCR4 binds to its ligand CXCL12/SDF1 which is constitutively expressed in the BM thereby inhibiting the mobilization of CXCR4 expressing immune progenitor cells. Moreover, increased numbers of effector cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are directly correlated to enhanced immunotherapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we hypothesized that CXCR4 antagonism will result in movement of immune progenitor cells from BM to periphery leading to increased availability of T-cells in the periphery and better infiltration of effector cells into the TME. Methods: In TC-1 mouse tumor-model, we tested the effects of CXCR4 antagonist (BL-8040; 4 doses; 24 h apart; 20 mg/kg) on the tumor growth and mice survival in the presence of tumor-specific antigen priming using E7 peptide vaccine (3 doses, one week apart). Anti-tumor immune responses were determined in the tumor tissues obtained 3-4 days after the second vaccination using flow cytometry. Results: We found that BL-8040 given with specific antigenic stimulation results in significantly enhanced anti-tumor immune response, leading to a decrease in tumor growth (p≤0.001 at day 21) and prolonged mice survival. At day 35 after tumor implantation, 80% of mice survived in the BL-8040 + vaccine treatment group compared to 0% survival following BL-8040 or vaccine treatments. Interestingly, we also found that BL-8040 leads to a significant increase in the numbers of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells in the TME. We also found that starting BL-8040 prior to or together with the priming of the mice did not affect the outcome, suggesting that the scheduling of BL-8040 does not affect the therapeutic outcomes. Conclusions: These results suggest that BL-8040 treatment enhances anti-tumor immune response by potentially increasing the immune progenitor cells in the periphery leading to a better immune response. These results also suggest that BL-8040, a CXCR4 antagonist, is a promising immune-modulatory agent with potent anti-tumor effects. </jats:p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Table S2 from Single Dose of the CXCR4 Antagonist BL-8040 Induces Rapid Mobilization for the Collection of Human CD34<sup>+</sup> Cells in Healthy Volunteers
No full textTable S2A: Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of BL-8040 after Day 1 (First Dose) in Healthy Volunteers. Table S2B: Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of BL-8040 after Day 2 (Second Dose) in Healthy Volunteers</p
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Recommended from our members
BL-8040, a CXCR4 Antagonist, in Combination with Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: the COMBAT trial
No full textSingle agent immunotherapy has limited effect in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), underscoring the need to co-target alternative pathways. CXCR4 blockade promotes T-cell tumor infiltration and is synergistic with anti-PD1 therapy in PDAC mouse models. We conducted a phase IIa, open label, two-cohort study to assess the safety, efficacy and immunobiological effects of the CXCR4 antagonist BL-8040 (motixafortide) with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in metastatic PDAC (NCT02826486). Primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. In cohort-1, 37 subjects with disease progression after one or more lines of chemotherapy received BL-8040 and pembrolizumab. The DCR was 34.5% in the evaluable population (modified intention to treat, mITT N=29) including nine patients (31%) with stable disease and one (3.4%) with partial response. Median OS was 3.3 months in the ITT population. Notably, in patients receiving study drugs as second-line mOS was 7.5 months. BL-8040 increased CD8+ effector T-cells tumor infiltration and decreased myeloid derived suppressor cells, and further decreased circulating Tregs. In a 22 patients expansion cohort-2 combining BL-8040 and pembrolizumab with standard second-line chemotherapy, ORR was 32%, DCR was 77%, with median duration of response of 7.8 months. These data suggest that CXCR4/PD-1 blockade may expand the benefit of chemotherapy in PDAC and warrant confirmation in subsequent randomized trial.Version of Recor
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
