1,722,984 research outputs found

    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta

    No full text
    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta, priznat od strane Ministarstva poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede, Uprava za zaštitu bilja, rešenje broj 320-04-2054/2/2018-11 od 27.02.2020. godine, Beograd, Republika Srbij

    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta (Ukrajina)

    No full text
    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta, priznat od strane Ministarstva za poljoprivredu Ukrajine (Міністерство аграрної політики та продовольства України), rešenje Državne komisije za zaštitu biljnih sorti (Державна служба з охорони прав на сорти рослин) br. 17039160 od 11.02.2020. godine, Ukrajina

    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta (Rusija)

    No full text
    NS H 8003, hibrid suncokreta, priznat od strane Ministarstva za poljoprivredu Ruske Federacije (Министерство сельского хозяйства Российской Федерации), rešenje Državne komisije Ruske Federacije za ispitivanje i zaštitu selekcionih dostignuća (Государственная комиссия Российской Федерации по испытанию и охране селекционных достижений (ФГБУ Госсорткомиссия)) br. 8262304 od 2020. godine, Moskva, Ruska Federacij

    Resistance of Capsicum annuum \u27Criollo de Morelos\u27 lines 8003 and 8004 to several potyvirus isolates

    Full text link
    In this study, the basis of resistance of Capsicum annuum \u27Criollo de Morelos\u27 lines 8003 and 8004 to several potyviruses was investigated. In order to evaluate viral replication in initial sites, PAS-ELISA was carried out in whole-inoculated leaf samples. In addition, tissue print immunoblot assays were employed to determine if viral coat protein antigen could be detected in stem sections. The potyviral isolates of interest were PVY-0, PVY-1, 2, PVY-TN100, TEV-HAT, TEV-CA, TEV-V49, PepMoV-CA, and PepMoV-V1182. Line 8003, 8004 and its F1 progeny, 8004-17, exhibited broad-spectrum resistance by the lack of symptoms and failure to support viral movement into the vascular system to all isolates of interest except PepMoV-CA. The CA isolate of PepMoV was able to enter the vascular system and invade young tissues in line 8004 and 8004-17. Line 8003 was unaffected by PepMoV-CA infection. Studies involving initial inoculated leaves at 7 and 14 dpi revealed the lack of detection of PVY-0, PVY-TN100, and PVY-1, 2 coat protein antigen in initial inoculated leaves up to 14 dpi in lines 8003, 8004, and 8004-17. The TEV isolates HAT, CA, and V49, were typically not detected in initial inoculated leaves in 8003, 8004, and 8004-17 while PepMoV isolates CA and V-49 were detected up to 50 % of the time at 14 dpi in 8004 and 8004-17, with 8003 unaffected

    Linked collectors and determiners for: Revisión de las Agavaceae (sensu stricto), Crassulaceae y Liliaceae incluidas en el PROY-NOM-059-ECOL-2000.

    No full text
    Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revisión de las Agavaceae (sensu stricto), Crassulaceae y Liliaceae incluidas en el PROY-NOM-059-ECOL-2000". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/abb9972c-8003-464a-89d7-955f10064cae">https://bionomia.net/dataset/abb9972c-8003-464a-89d7-955f10064cae</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/abb9972c-8003-464a-89d7-955f10064cae">https://gbif.org/dataset/abb9972c-8003-464a-89d7-955f10064cae</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package

    The Methylome of <i>Azotobacter chroococcum</i> NCIMB 8003.

    No full text
    <p><sup>m6</sup>A = <i>N</i><sup>6</sup>-methyladenine, <sup>m4</sup>C = <i>N</i><sup><i>4</i></sup>-methylcytosine; W = A or T, S = C or G</p><p>The Methylome of <i>Azotobacter chroococcum</i> NCIMB 8003.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore