1,725,528 research outputs found
NS H 8002, hibrid suncokreta
No full textNS H 8002, hibrid suncokreta, priznat od strane Ministarstva poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede, Uprava za zaštitu bilja, rešenje broj 320-04-2034/2/2018-11 od 27.02.2020. godine, Beograd, Republika Srbij
NS H 8002, hibrid suncokreta (Rumunija)
No full textNS H 8002 je hibrid suncokreta (Helianthus annuus L.) priznat od strane Nacionalnog instituta za testiranje i registraciju biljnih vrsta Ministarstva za poljoprivredu Republike Rumunije.NS H 8002 is a sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrid released by the National Institute for Plant Cultivar Testing and Release, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Romania.Datum rešenja 29.03.2021. Bukureš
Andromeda polifolia. Gillespie, Saarela, Consaul & Bull 8002 (CAN 592360)
No full text<p>Andromeda polifolia. Gillespie, Saarela, Consaul & Bull 8002 (CAN 592360)</p
Oxford Instruments: Sonicaid Team 8002 Fetal Monitor
No full text The Sonicaid Team 8002 Fetal Monitor is a lightweight and versatile unit which monitors fetal heart rate and uterine activity using non-invasive ultrasound and external toco transducers. </jats:p
Linked collectors and determiners for: IICT Colecção Zoológica.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "IICT Colecção Zoológica". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/c690c2b5-8002-4d12-831c-9258dd618f78">https://bionomia.net/dataset/c690c2b5-8002-4d12-831c-9258dd618f78</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/c690c2b5-8002-4d12-831c-9258dd618f78">https://gbif.org/dataset/c690c2b5-8002-4d12-831c-9258dd618f78</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
California Poll: 8002 -- April 2-8, 1980
No full textThe Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter a
wareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 8002 N=1012
Supplementary Methods from Preclinical Efficacy of the Novel Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 Inhibitor BAY-8002 and Associated Markers of Resistance
No full textSupplementary Methods: Synthesis and characterization of BAY-8002; Tritium labeling of AZD3965 and BAY-8002; MCT1 and MCT4 14C-lactate uptake measurements in the X. laevis oocytes expression System</p
Supplemental Tables S1-3 from Preclinical Efficacy of the Novel Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 Inhibitor BAY-8002 and Associated Markers of Resistance
No full textSupplemental Table S1: Selectivity profile of BAY-8002. Supplemental Table S2: Summary table of functional and proliferation IC50 data for BAY-8002 and AZD3965. Supplemental Table S3: Responses to BAY-8002 and AZD3965 of cell lines with acquired resistance to MCT1 inhibition.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
