1,723,679 research outputs found
Block Card 5341 Sanders Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 5341 Sanders Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Rancamp Place Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 5341 Springdale Avenue
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 5341 Springdale Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Seneca Gardens Addition | Greenwood Park Area (Toledo, Ohio
Characterisation of acid protease expressed from Aspergillus oryzae MTCC 5341
No full textAspergillus oryzae (MTCC 5341) has the largest expanse of hydrolytic genes, that includes 135 protease genes coding for alkaline, acid as well as neutral proteases. This study reports the purification and characterisation of an acid protease obtained from A. oryzae MTCC 5341. A. oryzae MTCC 5341 produces one of the highest reported acid protease activities reported so far (8.3נ105U/g dry bran). The extracellular acid protease (47kDa) was found to be active in the pH range 3.0-4.0 and stable in the pH range 2.5-6.5. Optimum temperature for activity was 55C. The protease was purified 17-fold with a yield of 29%. The enzyme was characterised to be an aspartate protease by inhibition studies, using pepstatin and its ability to activate trypsinogen. The enzyme cleaved the B-chain of insulin at L-V and Y-T residues
LARC 5341 Land Technology 1 2006, Professor John Fain
No full textSelected student work from the 2006 landscape architecture course LARC 5341 Land Technology 1, Professor John Fain. Student work includes: area plan and drawing, Sonal D Parmar
Linked collectors and determiners for: Morris Arboretum of University of Pennsylvania.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Morris Arboretum of University of Pennsylvania". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/fcab85b5-5341-41b3-aa59-24432ea805b2">https://bionomia.net/dataset/fcab85b5-5341-41b3-aa59-24432ea805b2</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/fcab85b5-5341-41b3-aa59-24432ea805b2">https://gbif.org/dataset/fcab85b5-5341-41b3-aa59-24432ea805b2</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
5341. Guillaume Caoursin, Obsidionis Rhodie urbis descriptio, 1496
No full text5341. Guillaume Caoursin, Obsidionis Rhodie urbis descriptio, 1496. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). V. Introduction générale - Les Valois (suite), Louis XI et Charles VIII (1461-1494) Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1904. p. 139
5341. Guillaume Caoursin, Obsidionis Rhodie urbis descriptio, 1496
No full text5341. Guillaume Caoursin, Obsidionis Rhodie urbis descriptio, 1496. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). V. Introduction générale - Les Valois (suite), Louis XI et Charles VIII (1461-1494) Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1904. p. 139
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
