1,723,593 research outputs found
Linked collectors and determiners for: Redefinition And Generic Revision Of The North American Vaejovid Scorpion Subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, With Descriptions Of Six New Genera.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Redefinition And Generic Revision Of The North American Vaejovid Scorpion Subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, With Descriptions Of Six New Genera". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/f86801d1-5089-42e6-9f91-423312e06eba">https://bionomia.net/dataset/f86801d1-5089-42e6-9f91-423312e06eba</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/f86801d1-5089-42e6-9f91-423312e06eba">https://gbif.org/dataset/f86801d1-5089-42e6-9f91-423312e06eba</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Abstract 5089: AMPK activation <i>vs.</i> inhibition induces apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by differentially altering PI3K/Akt/mTOR or RAS/cRAF/MEK/Erk signaling
Abstract
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy and the main cause of cancer-related deaths in children. Therefore, search for novel treatment strategies is warranted. We identified AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK), a master regulator of bioenergetics, as a potential target for ALL therapy due to its effects on cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation, as well as its crosstalk with critical metabolic and oncogenic pathways. We demonstrated that treatment of NALM6 (Bp-ALL) and CEM (T-ALL) cells with AICAR, an AMPK activator, induced growth inhibition and apoptosis. Using metformin, another AMPK agonist, we found 40% growth inhibition, and up to five- and three-fold greater induction of apoptosis relative to controls in CEM and NALM6, respectively. Unexpectedly, rescue experiments with AMPK inhibitors Ara-A and compound-C (CC) failed to abrogate the cytotoxic effects induced by AICAR. When used alone, Ara-A induced 60% and 40% cell death in NALM6 and CEM cells, respectively, whereas CC induced 75- and 15-fold more apoptotic death relative to controls. To investigate the mechanism by which AMPK activation vs. inhibition induced apoptosis, we determined levels of P-AMPK (T172) and factors associated with the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and RAS/cRAF/Erk signaling pathways in NALM6 and CEM cells treated with either CC, AICAR, or in combination. Our data show that P-AMPK levels were decreased by CC and increased by AICAR. Additional Western blots demonstrated that these agents exerted opposite effects on Akt and RAS signaling. CC decreased P-Akt (S473) and activated the RAS pathway, while AICAR increased P-Akt. We showed that activation of Akt by AICAR down-regulated the RAS pathway via phosphorylation of cRAF (S259). P-mTOR (S2448) and P-4EBP1 (T70) exhibited a greater decrease in cells treated with CC + AICAR as compared to each agent alone. A significant decrease in P-Akt was also detected in cells treated with both agents vs. each drug alone. Together, our data indicate that AICAR and CC induce cell death in ALL cells by two different mechanisms mediated by AMPK: AICAR-activation of AMPK inhibited the RAS-dependent cell proliferation pathway, and CC-inhibition of AMPK by down-regulating the Akt cell survival pathway. These results suggest that alterations in AMPK signaling may regulate the cross-talk between the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and RAS/cRAF/Erk cascades and may dictate the fate of ALL cells by regulating apoptosis after exposure to agents targeting these pathways. Experiments co-targeting AMPK and Akt using AICAR and Akt-inhibitor X, respectively, induced synergistic growth inhibition in CEM (CI=0.90) and NALM6 (CI=0.85) cells compared to each drug alone. These findings provide a rationale for simultaneously targeting AMPK and key signaling factors associated with either PI3K/Akt/mTOR or RAS/cRAF/Erk pathways in ALL.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5089.</jats:p
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
