1,725,649 research outputs found
DEA 4590/6500 Course Syllabus - Fall 09
No full textDEA 4590/6500, Programming Methods in Design, Course Syllabus by Instructor Lorraine Maxwell, Fall 200
DEA 4590/6500 Course Syllabi Fall 2012
No full textDEA 4590/6500, Programming Methods in Design by Lorraine E. Maxwell, Fall 201
DEA 4590-6500 Course Syllabus - Fall 10
No full textDEA 4590-6500, Programming Methods in Design, Course Syllabus by Instructor Lorraine Maxwell, Fall 201
DEA 4590/6500 Course Syllabus - Fall 2011
No full textDEA 4590/6500, Programming Methods in Design, Course Syllabus by Lorraine Maxwell, Fall 201
Linked collectors and determiners for: Revision of the spider genus Nyetnops Platnick & Lise (Araneae: Caponiidae) with proposition of the new genus Nopsma, from Central and South America.
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revision of the spider genus Nyetnops Platnick & Lise (Araneae: Caponiidae) with proposition of the new genus Nopsma, from Central and South America". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/eb2b70bd-66e2-4590-b938-f0eff9a5bc08">https://bionomia.net/dataset/eb2b70bd-66e2-4590-b938-f0eff9a5bc08</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/eb2b70bd-66e2-4590-b938-f0eff9a5bc08">https://gbif.org/dataset/eb2b70bd-66e2-4590-b938-f0eff9a5bc08</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Linked collectors and determiners for: Review of the Camponotus aureopilus species-group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), including a second Camponotus with a metapleural gland..
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Review of the Camponotus aureopilus species-group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), including a second Camponotus with a metapleural gland.". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07">https://bionomia.net/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07">https://gbif.org/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Linked collectors and determiners for: Review of the Camponotus aureopilus species-group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), including a second Camponotus with a metapleural gland..
No full textNatural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Review of the Camponotus aureopilus species-group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), including a second Camponotus with a metapleural gland.". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07">https://bionomia.net/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07">https://gbif.org/dataset/8e9453cc-91d1-4590-8b31-21010c51cd07</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
