1,724,295 research outputs found
Santa Fe (ATSF) 3465
No full textA photograph postcard showing Santa Fe 3465, 4-6-4 (BLW), class 3460
Santa Fe (ATSF) 3465 (neg)
No full textA photograph negative showing Santa Fe (ATSF) 3465, 4-6-4, at Topeka, KS
Block Card 3465 Radisson Avenue
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 3465 Radisson Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Heather Downs Second Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 3465 Pineway Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Garrison Colonial | Dwelling | Beverly Place Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio) | 3465 Pineway Drive (Toledo, Ohio
[Veto of H. 3465, R-169]
No full textThis veto message from Governor Mark Sanford vetoes H. 3465, R-169, a bill providing that beginning with school year 2003-2004, the starting date for the annual school term of Greenwood and Laurens County School Districts must be set by the board of trustees of each respective school district
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
