1,726,163 research outputs found
Block Card 3055 Muirfield Avenue
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Cape Cod Style | 3055 Muirfield Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Heather Downs Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 3055 Glencairn Avenue
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Cape Cod Style | 3055 Glencairn Avenue (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Heather Downs Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 3055 Edgebrook Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 3055 Edgebrook Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Edgehill Subdivision (Toledo, Ohio) | Trilby Area (Toledo, Ohio)
Block Card 3055 Dorian Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Split-Level Style | 3055 Dorian Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Southern Woods (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 3055 June Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 3055 June Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Fuller's Springtime Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio
First Determination of the Spin-Parity of Ξ(3055)+,0 Baryons
No full textThe Ξ0(−) → Ξ(3055)+(0)(→+(0)Λ)− decay chains are observed, and the spin-parity of Ξ(3055)+(0) baryons is determined for the first time. The measurement is performed using proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of √ =13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb−1, recorded by the LHCb experiment between 2016 and 2018. The spin-parity of the Ξ(3055)+(0) baryons is determined to be 3/2+ with a significance of more than 6.5 (3.5) compared to all other tested hypotheses. The up-down asymmetries of the Ξ0(−) → Ξ(3055)+(0)− transitions are measured to be −0.92±0.10±0.05 (−0.92±0.16±0.22), consistent with maximal parity violation, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. These results support the hypothesis that the Ξ(3055)+(0) baryons correspond to the first -wave -mode excitation of the Ξ flavor triplet.For complete list of authors see http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.081901</p
First determination of the spin-parity of Ξc(3055)+,0 baryons
Get PDFThe Ξ0(−)
b → Ξc(3055)+(0)
(→ D+(0)
π− decay chains are observed, and the spin-parity of
Ξc(3055)+(0) baryons is determined for the first time. The measurement is performed using proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of √s = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated
luminosity of 5.4 fb−1, recorded by the LHCb experiment between 2016 and 2018. The spin-parity of
the Ξc(3055)+(0) baryons is determined to be 3/2+ with a significance of more than 6.5σ (3.5σ) compared
to all other tested hypotheses. The up-down asymmetries of the Ξ0(−)
b → Ξc(3055)+(0)
π− transitions are
measured to be −0.92 ± 0.10 ± 0.05 (−0.92 ± 0.16 ± 0.22), consistent with maximal parity violation,
where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. These results support the hypothesis
that the Ξc(3055)+(0) baryons correspond to the first D-wave λ-mode excitation of the Ξc flavor triplet
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
