1,727,939 research outputs found
Royal tour engine #2850, Field
No full textEngine #2850 (Royal Hudson) at Field during 1939 Royal visit, May 193
Royal tour engine #2850, Field
No full textEngine #2850 (Royal Hudson) at Field during 1939 Royal visit, May 193
Royal tour engine #2850, Field
No full textEngine #2850 (Royal Hudson) at Field during 1939 Royal visit, May 193
Royal tour engine #2850, Stoney Creek bridge
No full textEngine #2850 (Royal Hudson) going over the Stoney Creek bridge during Royal visit, May 1939
Royal tour engine #2850, Stoney Creek bridge
No full textEngine #2850 (Royal Hudson) going over the Stoney Creek bridge during Royal visit, May 1939
Block Card 2850 Kenwood Boulevard
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: | 2850 Kentwood Boulevard (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Oakleaf Place Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | Old Orchard Area (Toledo, Ohio) | Colonial Revival Styl
Block Card 2850 Emmick Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Dwelling | Westgate Area (Toledo, Ohio) | Lucas County (Ohio). County Auditor. | 2850 Emmick Drive (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 2850 Wanamaker Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Ranch houses | 2850 Wanamaker Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Whitmer Heights Addition (Toledo, Ohio) | Trilby Area (Toledo, Ohio)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
