1,726,509 research outputs found
2806-ortholog alignment
No full text2806-ortholog alignment of Arachnida, with at least 15 taxa represented for each gene
Astronomische nachrichten, nos 2804-2806
No full textAstronomische nachrichten, nos 2804-2806. In: Bulletin astronomique, tome 4, 1887. pp. 490-497
Gene partitions file for 2806-ortholog alignment
No full textGene partitions file for 2806-ortholog alignmen
Lentamyces zychae NRRL 2806 Transcriptome - Lenzyc02
No full textLentamyces zychae NRRL 2806 Transcriptome; grown in YPD plate (with cellophan
Block Card 2806 Rathbun Drive
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Cape Cod Style | 2806 Rathbun Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Parkdale Addition | Auburndale Area (Toledo, Ohio
Block Card 2806 Sagamore Road
No full textThis image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Garrison colonial | 2806 Sagamore Road (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Whitney Hills Addition | Auburndale Area (Toledo, Ohio
Reproduzierbarkeit von Messungen zur Luftdichtheit von Gebaeuden Abschlussbericht
No full textSIGLEAvailable from TIB Hannover: RN 5905(2806) / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekArbeitsgemeinschaft Industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen e.V., Koeln (Germany)DEGerman
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
