1,721,390 research outputs found

    Christine Clara 19920 3422

    No full text
    CHRISTINE CLARA 19920 3422 Christine Clara 19920 3422 ( -

    Obtaining S-N curves from crack growth curves: an alternative to self-similarity

    No full text
    The authors are indebted to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation MICINN (Project BIA2010-19920) for financial support of this work

    Statistical joint evaluation of fracture results from distinct experimental programs: An application to annealed glass

    Get PDF
    The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Asturian Regional Research and the National Spanish Research Programs through the Severo Ochoa and FPI Pre-doctoral Grants, as well as through the BIA 2010-19920 and BIA2011-28959 projects

    Probabilistic assessment of fatigue initiation data on highly crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylenes

    No full text
    Spanish Interministerial Commission for Science and Technology (CICYT), Project no. MAT 2010-16175 and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN), Project no. BIA 2010-19920

    Probabilistic assessment of fatigue data from shape homologous but different scale specimens. Application to an experimental program

    No full text
    The authors are indebted to the MICINN (Ministry of Science and Innovation) (Project BIA2010-19920) the Ministry of Science and Education and from Regional Project SV-PA-11-012 of the Chancellery of Science and Education of the Asturias Regional Government for financial support of this wor

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore