1,740,041 research outputs found

    IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635)

    No full text
    IX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1634 - 1635) IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635) ( -

    IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635)

    No full text
    IX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1634 - 1635) IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635) ( -

    IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635)

    No full text
    IX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1634 - 1635) IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1634 - 1635) ( -

    IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1633 - 1634)

    No full text
    IX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1633 - 1634) IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1633 - 1634) ( -

    IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1633 - 1634)

    No full text
    IX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1633 - 1634) IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1633 - 1634) ( -

    Slovenska knjiga iz leta 1634?

    No full text
    Lo studio, basato su fonti archivistiche inedite, documenta la stampa nel 1634 a Trieste e la rilegatura a Lubiana di un libro di preghiere e regole della locale Congregazione dell'Immacolata concezione, distribuito l'8 dicembre 1634 ai confratelli della stessa dal suo prefetto, barone Antonio Marenzi

    Santa Fe (ATSF) 1634

    No full text
    A photograph print showing Santa Fe (ATSF) 1634, 2-10-2, San Bernardino, CA

    Christian Kellinghusen, Annales historici, 1634 - 1676

    No full text
    CHRISTIAN KELLINGHUSEN, ANNALES HISTORICI, 1634 - 1676 Christian Kellinghusen, Annales historici, 1634 - 1676 (1) Binding ( - ) Title page (1) Title page (2) Chapter (3) Binding ( -

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore