1,749,253 research outputs found
Asia 1592
No full textCovers northern Asia ; Relief shown pictorially ; ""Cum Privilegio"" appears inside lower left margin ; On verso: Latin text ; p. 100 ; From Abraham Ortelius's atlas: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, 4th ed., Antwerpen: Plantin Press, 1592 ; Includes text, notes, and color illCovers northern Asia. Relief shown pictorially. "Cum Privilegio" appears inside lower left margin. On verso: Latin text ; p. 100. From Abraham Ortelius's atlas: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, 4th ed., Antwerpen: Plantin Press, 1592. Includes text, notes, and color illustrations. Koeman, |c ORT 12 1592 (v.3, p.94-99).Color1:20,000,00
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1592 - 1593)
No full textIX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1592 - 1593)
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1592 - 1593) ( -
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1592 - 1593)
No full textIX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1592 - 1593)
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1592 - 1593) ( -
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1591 - 1592)
No full textIX A 1 - ALTE STADTRECHNUNGEN (1591 - 1592)
IX A 1 - Alte Stadtrechnungen (1591 - 1592) ( -
House Resolution Bill 1592
No full textHouse Resolution 1592 introduced by Congressman Charles Wilson regarding additions to the Big Thicket National Preserv
Inscriptions 1586 à 1592
No full textInscriptions 1586 à 1592. In: Revue épigraphique, tome 4, N°115, 1904. pp. 113-117
Author and sources of the text of "Cnotliwy Litwin" (1592)
No full textStraipsnyje tiriama 1592 m. pasirodžiusios knygos „Cnotliwy Litwin“ autorystė. „Cnotliwy Litwin“ laikomas pirmuoju Lietuvos istoriografijoje teminiu istorinių dokumentų rinkiniu, kurį sudaro knygos rengėjo tekstas ir 10 dokumentų, pagrindžiančių Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės teises į Livoniją. Knyga yra anoniminė, todėl siekiama nustatyti jos autorystę. Albertas Vijūkas-Kojalavičius knygos autorystę klaidingai priskyrė Krizostomui Volodkevičiui. Jis negalėjo sukurti šio kūrinio, nes Volodkevičius mirė 1642 m. būdamas 51 metų amžiaus. Nustatyti autorystę pagelbėjo 1594 m. Vilniuje išspausdinta knyga „Dialiog ślachcica litewskiego prawdziwy wonjy inflantskiej...“. Joje aprašomi trys Stepono Batoro žygiai prieš Maskvą 1579-1581 m. Lyginamoji analizė parodė, kad abi knygas parašė tas pats autorius. 1594 m. knygoje autorius įrašė savo inicialus „E. P. Philalethes Lituaniae“. Tikėtina tai buvo Elijas Pielgrzymowskis - Venslovo Agripos įsūnis, kuriam jis užrašė savo biblioteką 1564 m. Žinoma, kad Pielgrzymowskis 1569 m. mokėsi Königsbero Universitete ir apie 1583 m. tapo karaliaus sekretoriumi. 1588 ir 1590 m. Žygimantas Vaza siuntė Pielgrzymowskį į Livoniją atlikti įvairias administracines užduotis. Tai paaiškina Livonijos reikalų išmanymą, kuriuo pasižymėjo „Cnotliwy Litwin“ autorius. Pielgrzymowskio autorystė priskiriama dar bent kelioms knygoms, todėl jis laikytinas vienu produktyviausių XVI a. pabaigos autorių Lietuvos Didžiojoje Kunigaikštystėje. Reikšminiai žodžiai: "Cnotliwy Litwin"; Autorystė; Elijas Pielgrzymowskis (m. 1605); Gerasis (Dorasis) lietuvis; Istorinis šaltinis; Jokūbas Morkūnas; Juozas Radvila; Krizostomas Volodkevičius; Krizostomas Volodkevičius (1591-1642); Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė (LDK; Grand Duchy of Lithuania; GDL); Lenkija (Lenkijos karalystė. Kingdom of Poland. Poland); Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė (LDK; Grand Duchy of Lithuania; GDL); Lietuvos istoriografija; Livonija (Livonia); 16 amžius; "The Virtuous Lithuanian"; 16th century; Authorship; Chryzostom Wlodkiewicz (1591-1642); Cnotliwy Litwin; Elijas Pielgrzymowski (d. 1605); Historical source; Historiography of Lithuania; Jacob Markowicz; Jerzy Radziwil; Krizostomas Volodkevičius; Lithuanian historiography; Livonia; The Grand Duchy of Lithuania; XVI th centuryThe article deals with the authorship of a book "Cnotliwy Litwin", that appeared in 1592. "Cnotliwy Litwin" is considered to be the first thematic collection of historical documents in Lithuanian historiography, consisting of the author's text and 10 documents justifying the rights of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania to Livonia. The book is anonymous, which is why the aim is to determine its authorship. Albertas Vijūkas-Kojalavičius mistakenly attributed the book to Chryzostom Wołodkiewicz. He could not have created this work because Wołodkiewicz died in 1642 at the age of 51. A book "Dialog szlachcica litewskiego prawdziwy wojny inflanckiej...", published in Vilnius in 1594, helped to established its authorship. It describes three crusades by Stephen Báthory to Moscow in 1579-1581. Comparative analysis has shown that both books were written by the same author. In 1594, the author wrote his initials "E. P. Philalethes Lituaniae". It probably was Elijah Pielgrzymowski - the adopted son of Wacław Agryppa, to whom he decided to leave his library in 1564. It is known that Pielgrzymowski studied at the University of Königsberg in 1569, and became king's secretary in around 1583. In 1588 and 1590, Sigismund Vasa sent Pielgrzymowski to Livonia to perform various administrative tasks. This explains the knowledge of the Livonian affairs, noticed in the writings of the author of "Cnotliwy Litwin". Pielgrzymowski's authorship is attributed to at least several books, and therefore he is considered to be one of the most productive authors of the end of 16th century in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
PERANG IMJIN 1592-1598
No full textSkripsi ini berjudul “Perang Imjin 1592-1598 (Kajian Historis Perang Korea-Jepang di Semenanjung Korea”. Masalah penelitian yang dibahas oleh penulis adalah “Bagaimana Perang Imjin 1592-1598 antara Korea dengan Jepang yang terjadi di Semenanjung Korea”. Selain itu, untuk memfokuskan penelitian penulis merumuskan empat pertanyaan sebagai batasan penelitian yaitu: 1. Bagaimanakah kondisi sosial-budaya, ekonomi, serta politik di Korea dan Jepang awal abad ke 16? 2. Apakah yang menjadi faktor penyebab terjadinya perang Imjin di Semenanjung Korea awal abad ke 16? 3. Bagaimana terjadinya perang Imjin di Semenajung Korea? 4. Bagaimana dampak perang Imjin terhadap kondisi sosial-budaya, ekonomi, serta politik di Korea dan Jepang awal abad ke 17? Tujuan dari penelitian ini menganalisis Perang Imjin 1592-1598 antara Korea-Jepang di Semenanjung Korea. Penulis membuat skripsi ini karena Perang Imjin ini bisa dilihat dari berbagai pandangan yang lebih memihak negara yang berperang, seperti lebih memihak Jepang ataupun lebih condong ke pihak Korea. Maka dari itu penulis ingin melihat kajian tersebut dari pandangan yang berbeda. Metode yang digunakan penulis untuk meneliti kajian ini adalah metode penelitian sejarah yaitu pengumpulan sumber (heuristik), kritik sumber yang terdiri dari kritik eksternal dan kritik internal, penafsiran (interpretasi), dan penulisan (historiografi). Skripsi ini menggunakan pendekatan interdisipliner yaitu dari ilmu politik, ekonomi, sosiologi, serta antropologi. Konsep, teori, serta pandangan ilmu-ilmu tersebut membantu penulis untuk menafsirkan peristiwa perang tersebut. Perang Imjin merupakan perang besar yang terjadi di Asia Timur dan melibatkan tiga kerajaan di Asia Timur.
;---This paper entitled “The Imjin War 1592-1598 (Historical Study of Korean-Japanese war in the Korean Peninsula”. The research problem is "How Imjin War of 1592-1598 between Korea and Japan that occurred in the Korean Peninsula." In addition, for focusing research authors formulate four questions as a limitation of the study are: 1. How the socio-cultural, economic, politics as well as in Korea and Japan early 16th century? 2. What are the causes of the Imjin war on the Korean peninsula in the beginning of 16th century? 3. How does the Imjin war in Korean Peninsula? 4. What are impact of Imjin war against the socio-cultural, economic, political as well as in Korea and Japan early 17th century? The purpose of this study analyzes the Imjin war of 1592-1598 between Korea-Japan in the Korean Peninsula. The author makes this paper because the Imjin War can be seen from the various views that favor the belligerents, as favored Japanese or Korean are more inclined to side. Thus the authors would like to see the study of different views. The method used to examine this study is the method of historical research, there are the collection of sources (heuristics), criticism of sources consisted of external and internal criticism, exegesis (interpretation), and writing (historiography). This paper uses an interdisciplinary approach that of political science, economics, sociology, and anthropology. Concepts, theories, and views these sciences to help authors for interpret events of the war. The Imjin War was a war that took place in East Asia and involves three kingdoms in East Asia
- …
