1,743,946 research outputs found

    SHEPHERD SCHOOL SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA and the SHEPHERD SINGERS Monday, March 18, 1991 8:00 p.m. in Hamman Hall

    No full text
    Presented by SyzygyProgram: Bach (Again): Come sweet death, Edwin London -- Amor, Claudio Monteverdi (1567-1643) -- Hor ch'el ciel e la terra, Claudio Monteverdi (1567-1643) -- Madrigali, Bernard Rands -- Passion according to St. John, Heinrich Schütz (1585-1672) -- In Heinrich's shoes, Edwin London

    Elizabethan foreign policy : 1567-1585

    Full text link
    The topic of this paper, Elizabeth Foreign Policy: 1567-1585 , evolved from an attempt to analyze Anglo-Spanish relations during the same period. The interrelatedness of the religious and political problems among the major powers of the period led this author frequently into considerations outside the original sphere of interest. While the topic was expanded in scope, it should be noted that the paper attempts to deal only with the more significant factors affecting English foreign policy and not not pretend to illuminate the complex and changing national situations elsewhere. Specific external events are introduced only when they directly affect Elizabeth foreign policy considerations

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Ewart A 1567

    No full text
    Hibernia insula non procul ab Anglia vulgare Hirlandia vocata 1567. [Facsimile of a...map...] John Gough 16 miles to one inch Dublin : W.B. Kelly 760x56

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    1567 / 1616: A Learned Commendation of the Politique Lawes of Englande / De Laudibus Legum Angliae

    No full text
    Fortescue, John. A Learned Commendation of the Politique Lawes of Englande. London: Rychard Tottill, 1567. Fortescue, John. De Laudibus Legum Angliae. London: For the Companie of Stationers, 1616. Sir John Fortescue (c.1397–1479) composed this treatise around 1471 in the form of a dialogue between the author and the Prince of Wales. Written in Latin from a decidedly pro-English point of view, the work compares common law with civil law and touts the advantages of a constitutional over an absolute monarchy. As a didactic work, it avoids technical details, presenting a view of the law not seen in other contemporary treatises. The 1567 edition was the first English translation and the 1616 edition, edited by jurist John Selden (1584–1654), the first to bear its weightier title. View the 1567 edition\u27s record in the library catalog.View the 1616 edition\u27s record in the library catalog.https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/oldelawebookes/1008/thumbnail.jp

    1567 / 1616: A Learned Commendation of the Politique Lawes of Englande / De Laudibus Legum Angliae

    No full text
    Fortescue, John. A Learned Commendation of the Politique Lawes of Englande. London: Rychard Tottill, 1567. Fortescue, John. De Laudibus Legum Angliae. London: For the Companie of Stationers, 1616. Sir John Fortescue (c.1397–1479) composed this treatise around 1471 in the form of a dialogue between the author and the Prince of Wales. Written in Latin from a decidedly pro-English point of view, the work compares common law with civil law and touts the advantages of a constitutional over an absolute monarchy. As a didactic work, it avoids technical details, presenting a view of the law not seen in other contemporary treatises. The 1567 edition was the first English translation and the 1616 edition, edited by jurist John Selden (1584–1654), the first to bear its weightier title. View the 1567 edition\u27s record in the library catalog.View the 1616 edition\u27s record in the library catalog.https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/oldelawebookes/1008/thumbnail.jp
    corecore