1,722,387 research outputs found
Recommendations for author signatures on scientific output at the Universitat Oberta de de Catalunya
No full textAquest document ha estat actualitzat per "Author signature recommendations for scientific output at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya", aprovat el 20 de març de 2018. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/76965Este documento ha sido actualitzado por "Author signature recommendations for scientific output at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya", aprovado el 20 de marzo de 2018. Disponible a: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/76965El 9 d'octubre de 2014 la Comissió de Recerca i Doctorat de la Universitat va aprovar les Recomanacions per a la signatura dels autors en la producció científica de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Aquest document és un recull de recomanacions per al personal de la UOC pel que fa a la seva signatura en qualsevol publicació científica en què participi. Aquestes recomanacions volen el següent: fomentar l'ús d'una signatura única; fomentar l'ús correcte de la filiació institucional dels autors de la UOC; millorar i assegurar una correcta visibilitat dels autors en les bases de dades de publicacions, repositoris, cercadors a la xarxa, etc.; facilitar el seguiment de la producció científica de la UOC; fomentar l'ús d'una signatura de correu electrònic consistent i que doti de solidesa la marca UOC.El 9 de octubre de 2014 la Comisión de Investigación y Doctorado de la Universidad aprobó las Recomendaciones para la firma de los autores en la producción científica
de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Este documento es una compilación de recomendaciones para el personal de la UOC en lo referente a su firma en cualquier publicación científica en la que participe. Estas recomendaciones buscan: fomentar el uso de una firma única; fomentar el uso correcto de la filiación institucional de los autores de la UOC; mejorar y asegurar una correcta visibilidad de los autores en las bases de datos de publicaciones,
repositorios, buscadores en la red, etc.; facilitar el seguimiento de la producción científica de la UOC; fomentar el uso de una firma de correo electrónico consistente y que dote de solidez a la marca UOC.On 9 October 2014, the Research and Doctorate Scientific Committee approved the Recommendations for author signatures on scientific output at the Universitat Oberta de de Catalunya. This document presents a series of recommendations for UOC staff on signing scientific publications to which they have contributed. These recommendations are intended to: encourage authors to use a unique signature; promote the correct identification of UOC authors' affiliations;
ensure satisfactory visibility of UOC authors in publication databases, repositories, web searches, etc.; facilitate the monitoring of the UOC's scientific output; promote the use of a standardised email signature that strengthens the UOC's brand image
Schematic of transmitochondrial cybrid generation for the mtDNA 10609 site.
No full text<p>Schematic of transmitochondrial cybrid generation for the mtDNA 10609 site.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Recull de recomanacions per a la signatura de documents científico-tècnics
No full textDocument obsolet. Vegeu la versió vigent en el recurs relacionat: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/38761El dia 28 d'octubre de 2009 es va aprovar, en Consell de Govern, el recull de recomanacions per al personal de la UOC pel que fa a la seva signatura en qualsevol publicació científica on participi. Aquestes recomanacions intenten, en part, fomentar l'ús d'una signatura única que hauria de ser usada sempre de la mateixa manera per assegurar una correcta visibilitat de l'autor/a en les bases de dades de publicacions, repositoris, cercadors a la xarxa, etc. i facilitar també fer un seguiment de la producció científica de tota la institució/centre/departament, etc. a càrrec de la pròpia institució o d'entitats públiques externes implicades en l'avaluació i el finançament d'activitats de recerca.On 28 October 2009 was approved, by the Governing Council, a collection of recommendations for the UOC staff regarding their signature on any scientific publication in which they participate. The aim of these recommendations is to promote the use of a unique signature that should always be used in the same manner to ensure proper visibility of the author / publication databases, repositories, the search network, etc.. and also to facilitate the track of all the scientific production of the institution / center / department, etc.. by the institution or public entities involved in the evaluation and external funding for research
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
