18062 research outputs found
Sort by
The Internationalization of Ukrainian Universities: European, National, and Institutional Dimensions
No full textSpecial Issu
Digitalisation of Higher Education in Zimbabwe: A Challenging Necessity and Emerging Solutions
No full textSpecial Issu
“Originally I Came from the Least of Society”: Making Sense of International Students’ Understandings of Social Class through Emotional Commentaries
No full textEducation in Exile as a Hope-making Practice: the Case of Russian Higher Education Projects
No full textSpecial Issu
Conceptualizing micro-level internationalization from empirical and conceptual constructs: adding the human dimension
No full textWrack Lines Volume 24, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2024
No full textNatural Effects: Tales of Our Dynamic Environment is the theme of this issue, with articles about a research project using GoPro cameras on oyster cages; the exploding population of black sea bass in Long Island Sound; three research projects in Connecticut salt marshes; a children\u27s book illustrator and author and her book about kelp farming; and a living shoreline project in Old Saybrook, CT
Why Pushback to California’s Advanced Clean Cars II Policy Won’t Stop the Electric Car Revolution
No full textIn a move some have called the beginning of the end for the internal combustion engine, the California Air Resources Board has created regulations, Advanced Clean Cars II, to target California’s carbon pollution, banning the sale of new gas-powered cars and light trucks in the state by 2035. These regulations come from a special privilege held only by the state of California through a preemption waiver from the emissions regulations set by the Clean Air Act. Other states can sign on to California’s waiver, taking it from a special privilege to a second set of emissions regulations, almost equal in power to the federal regulations. Pushback to California’s waiver comes in the form of an equal sovereignty argument that may go all the way to the Supreme Court. But consumers, and the automotive industry, are moving towards electric vehicles regardless of the regulations. This Note seeks to defend the continued ability of states to choose (despite equal sovereignty concerns) between a federal standard and a California-led standard through the lens of the electric vehicle market
Discovering the Future of Personal Jurisdiction
No full textA deluge is coming. The Supreme Court’s two most recent personal jurisdiction cases—Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District and Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railroad—have thrown this area of law into even more flux than before. Because of these cases’ heavy emphasis on the fact-intensive nature of personal jurisdiction law, plaintiffs facing down motions to dismiss based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) are going to start asking an obvious question: If the Supreme Court thinks facts are so important to personal jurisdiction, then should I try to get access to more facts? The result will be more requests to conduct jurisdictional discovery, and more courts having to figure out how to decide those requests.
Despite the occasional aspersions cast upon it, jurisdictional discovery’s newfound relevance is to be applauded. When used wisely, the practice can be more than just a useful tool for uncovering facts. It can also further hone the law of personal jurisdiction, rendering the doctrine more attune to the interests of all the parties involved. All that is needed is more guidance on how to use that tool.
This Article provides such guidance. Examining hundreds of orders that decided jurisdictional discovery requests, this Article uncovers a coherent set of rationales that courts have tacitly relied upon when rendering these decisions. These rationales provide a principled and practical framework for deciding jurisdictional discovery requests, one that courts can use both to bring additional coherence to the practice and to field what is likely to be the flood of discovery requests to come