Arete: Jurnal Filsafat
Not a member yet
60 research outputs found
Sort by
PRINSIP PARTISIPASI DAN SOLIDARITAS DALAM VISI PERSONALISTIK KAROL WOJTYLA
Solidarity is not only about someone's personal sympathy with his neighbor. It is
rooted in his personal and human values. Even it is not based on any similarity
of common views, purpose or goals of life, or even primordialism. It is about
values, humanity, and person.
In the experience of each human life, self-consciousness allows each self to be
conscious also of the other self that is the same and equal to himself. The other
self is certainly enmeshed in my life and my-self is enmeshed in his life. This
enmeshing or participation embraces all the dimensions of the human being
as a person. It does not involve only some dimensions of human life. This
enmeshment or participation is also not merely discourse or consciousness but
rather manifests itself in concrete action because, in principle, it is only in action
that we can acquire a complete knowledge of who man is as a person. Within
the scope of social life, participation is the key to solidarity between self and
the other self so that together they head towards the common good or bonum
commune. Thus, there is no true solidarity if it is not geared towards the bonum
commun
SKEPTISISME TEOLOGIS DAN JAWABAN FILSAFAT
Human language deals with sense experience. When human language has to speak on God, there comes the problem on which experience man can talk about Him. For God does not deal with human sense experience. How is it possible to use human language which is limited to his sense experience, to speak on God without lowering Him on human level? It precisely is the possibility of analogy. Analogy makes human language remain limited to his dimensional life and, at the same time, gives the possibility to speak on and talk with God. For essentially human being is spiritual and his language by his reason and the will contains human capacity to reach God
Bertemu Dengan Realitas: Belajar Dari Fenomenologi Husserl
oai:ojs.jurnal.wima.ac.id:article/166Phenomenology would like to restore man’s process of gaining knowledge in the relationship between the ideal transcendental subject which tends to the object, and the appearing object to man’s consciousness, precisely after the long history of tumult and tension between rationalism and empiricism on the valid ground of knowledge. In phenomenology, human consciousness brings man about being capable of transcending himself, his livelihood, the world, and others. In phenomenology, human reason now is as being-in the world, in its relationship with consciousness itself, the world, and others. That human life, the world, and nature live in peace and truth is phenomenology’s contribution to life that we hope it be so
Fenomenologi Agama Menuju Penghayatan Agama Yang Dewasa
One of research methods to analyze religion is phenomenology. This method begins with the phenomenon that appears in consciousness. Experience of religion from teh perspective of phenomenology means that we get into a discourse about subject’s consciousness in the phenomenon which enable someone to get eidos or the essence of religion. From this point of view, subject could distinguish which one constitutes essence or eidos and which one is mere manifestation. This ability is succeeding subject to understand the religion properly. Subject that understands religion properly usually have an ability to accept and celebrates diversity. Besides, subject will always realize that his existence is always in a relation with others’, so that his existence remains as co-existence. This awareness of co-existence at the end leads subject to grow up in the paradigm of pro-existence. It is so crucial a moment amid several violence that takes place in the name of religion in Indonesia that co-existence must be promoted
HUBUNGAN WAHYU DAN AKAL DALAM TRADISI FILSAFAT ISLAM
This paper attempts to represent the world of philosophical thinking on the relationship between faith and reason among moslem scholars and Islamic doctrines. Qoran is the fundamental principle in inspiring any attempt of reason to find the truth. It means that reason still has its place and possibility to find the truth based on the truth of faith which is inspired by Qoran. It is the focus of discussion between the two outstanding moslem scholars, Ibnu Rusyd (520 H/ 1126 A-595/ 1198) and Ibnu Taimiyyah (662/ 1263). Ibnu Rusyd approaches the correlation between faith and reason in the term of relationship (ittisal). Meanwhile, Ibnu Taimiyyah explores the correlation between faith and reason under the term of muwafaqat. These two scholars are different with one another especially in exploring the fundamental meaning of reason (’aql) and revelation (al-naql)
Antropologi Pendidikan Heideggerian dan Sumbangannya bagi Praksis Pendidikan Kita
The institution of education always regards with human formation to lead persons to grow up by assuming that every person is in his journey to perfecting himself. Any practice of institutional education depends much on the concept of anthropology of education. Heidegger sees that any individual has two dimensions i.e. empirical ego and transcendental ego. These two dimensions of ego stay in its unique relationship both with other individuals in the sphere of institutional education and with other things which are manifested to that ego in order to lead him to the truth. Search for truth of his existence as human being is the open way which in turn forces individual to become “being open” and “open being”. Education is a way of thought which involves human existence in its fullest sense
PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA-MANUSIA DEMOKRATIS FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN NOAM CHOMSKY RELEVANSI SERTA KETERBATASANNYA PADA KONTEKS INDONESIA
Education is the backbone of a civilized society. In the democratic society, education plays an important role to create, spread, and maintain the democratic ideals. That is the main idea in Noam Chomsky’s philosophy of education. There is a deep connection between democratic principles on the one hand, and democratic education paradigm on the other hand. However, these ideal is threatened by authoritarian way of thinking that exist in totalitarian ideology and capitalistic way of thinking. These two ideologies repress human freedom, and destroy democratic culture which is the bed rock of democratic society. Chomsky offers us a knowledge concerning the way to redesign education in facing the challenges of democratic society
Komunitas Politis: Fakta atau Hipotesa? Sebuah Pendekatan Fenomenologi Politis
In this paper, I want to give description and analysis concerning the meaning of the term political community. This paper also can be seen as a participation in the perennial debates concerning the problem of the order in the philosophy of social sciences. I will use phenomenology as a method to approach this problem as it developed by John Drummond and Edmund Husserl. The main argument is that the political community is a social fact that develop through hypothesis, and a hyphotesis that based always on social fact. In the end, I will give my critical remarks on this argument
IMAGINE THERE’S A HEAVEN REASONABLE RELIGION, RELIGIOUS REASON
Religious fundamentalism, on the one hand, as manifested in terrorist activity and extreme rationalism which leads to atheism on the other seem to be untenable choices for any honest man. Both put faith and reason at odds with one another. If neither is acceptable, then there must be a middle way. Thomas Aquinas has spoken about the medium virtutis, the golden mean, when it comes to virtuous acts, which avoid vicious extremes in any moral act. How do we find this medium virtutis between faith and reason? After looking at prudence as the recta ratio agibilium and seeing that the guide for the recta ratio is the truth, we then discover that, for moral truth, which is involved in the medium virtutis of faith and reason, the bridging criterion is human nature, and that reason spans not only the empirical realm, but the philosophical and supernatural realms as well
IMAN TANPA NALAR, BUNUH DIRI NALAR TANPA IMAN, DELUSI
Both whorsippers of extrem rationalism and religious fundamentalists have the tendency of reducting reality in their mere perspective and approach. On the one hand, the extrem rationalists emphasize their approach to reality based on mere verificative and empirical method in so far as there could be no room for religious explanation. On the other hand, religious fundamentalists face the modern world by purifying their doctrines, strengthening the identity, restrictring their normative principles, and taking religion up to the strategy of politic on freedom. It certainly is critical and crucial to watch on reason and faith in each proportion without tending to absolutize its perspective since any tendency to absolutize perspective reduces human capacity to approach reality naively. Without intense dialog, sooner or later faith and reason will come to any kind of pathology and danger of life