Jurnal Borneo Administrator
Not a member yet
450 research outputs found
Sort by
Symbolic Language Interpretation of Cultural Heritage Preservation Policy of Surabaya City
This study explores the symbolic use of language in Surabaya's cultural heritage preservation policies using the Interpretive Policy Analysis (IPA) approach. It analyzes policy documents and interviews with stakeholders and communities related to Hotel Majapahit, Tugu Pahlawan, and Tanjung Perak Main Harbormaster Building. The findings highlight how language in policy is not merely communicative but symbolic, reflecting community values, beliefs, and emotional ties to heritage. The paradigm shift in policy, from conservative to progressive and localistic approaches, is reflected in the change from "object" to "area", which expands the meaning of cultural heritage from physical aspects to social and environmental contexts. This study contributes theoretically to public policy and practically recommends inclusive language strategies for heritage policy
Analyzing Collaborative Governance in Tourism Development: A Case Study of Karampuang Island, West Sulawesi
Tourism is a strategic sector for regional development; however, the management of flagship destinations in developing regions frequently encounters challenges related to weak stakeholder coordination, limited infrastructure, and insufficient community participation. Karampuang Island in West Sulawesi possesses significant natural and cultural tourism potential, yet its development has not been optimally managed due to low inter-agency synergy and limited stakeholder engagement. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the pentahelix collaborative governance model, comprising government, private sector, academia, community or non-governmental organizations, and media, in the development of Karampuang Island as a tourism destination. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. The findings indicate that cross-sector collaboration has contributed to improvements in accessibility and public facilities, as reflected in the construction of Plaza Karampuang and the establishment of twelve micro, small, and medium enterprise kiosks. Nevertheless, formal coordination mechanisms remain weak due to the absence of inter-agency memorandums of understanding, limiting sustained collaboration. Private sector involvement in promotion and investment is still minimal, while academic contributions are largely confined to community service programs. Community participation has increased through the Tourism Awareness Group, although communication with government actors remains suboptimal. Media actors have actively promoted the destination, yet digital marketing strategies have not been maximized. In conclusion, the pentahelix model has the potential to strengthen tourism governance on Karampuang Island, provided it is supported by formal coordination platforms, community capacity building, and integrated digital marketing strategies to ensure sustainable tourism development and local community welfare
The Conflict Dynamics of General Election Commission of Republic of Indonesia and Ummat Party in 2024
This research discusses disputes in the 2024 General Election process involving Ummat Party, the General Election Commission of Republic of Indonesia (KPU), and Election Supervisory Agency of Republic of Indonesia (Bawaslu RI). This research also examines the dynamics of the conflict between the General Election Commission of Republic of Indonesia (KPU) and Ummat Party because of Decree of KPU number 528 of 2022 and the inconsistency of data and information. Ummat Party’s dissatisfaction led to fraud in its membership across two provinces. Tensions escalated as Ummat Party openly rejected the decision, only to end when it was declared eligible to contest the 2024 General Election. According to the research results, there was a miscommunication during the selection of political parties, and the dispute intensified due to fraud allegations. Therefore, to understand the reasons and effects of the administration of the 2024 General Election, the dynamics of this disagreement were analysed. This study finds that the fundamental causes of the dispute are data discrepancies, miscommunication, and a perceived lack of transparency during the factual verification. Nevertheless, the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPU) demonstrated its dedication to transparency and objectivity, adhering to electoral principles and existing regulations. This case highlights the vital significance of data accuracy and effective communication in preserving the integrity and public confidence in electoral processes. This qualitative research used interviews and documentation. The data analyses were performed using Conflict Theory, particularly the application of conflict wheel indicators. The informants were representatives of the General Election Commission of Republic of Indonesia (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (Bawaslu RI). At the same time, Ummat Party refused to be interviewed
Training Evaluation Based on the Kirkpatrick Levels 2 and 3 Evaluation Model: A Case Study on Induction Program for Novice Teachers
The 2021 Teacher Competency Test results indicate the need to enhance teacher competency. The Novice Teachers Induction Program is designed to address this issue by guiding new teachers in their professional development. This research aims to evaluate the induction program results for Novice Teachers regarding teacher competence development using the Kirkpatrick Levels 2 and 3 training evaluation models. This seeks to determine the impact of the induction program on the development of skills and knowledge and the changes in attitudes and behavior of novice teachers. This research employed a qualitative descriptive research design,with a case study regarding implementing the induction program for Novice Teachers at at one of the public junior high schools in Jakarta, Indonesia. Data collection was done through interviews, document analysis, and observation. Based on the evaluation results using the Kirkpatrick Levels 2 and 3 evaluation model, it was found that the induction program positively impacted competency development, increased knowledge, improved skills, and changed the attitudes and behavior of Novice Teachers. The supervisors also succeeded in overcoming the challenges faced by Novice Teachers. However, the induction programs for Novice Teachersrequired more explicit formative assessment instruments. In evaluating the performance of Novice Teachers, they only relied on observations from supervising teachers, school principals, and supervisors. Recommendations were therefore provided to the Directorate General of Teachers and Education Personnel to reform implementation standards and performance assessment instruments within the PIG
Improving End-User Satisfaction with Electronic Medical Records (EMR)
In today's interconnected world, it is widely understood that the effectiveness of health information system, a key component of information technology, depends on user satisfaction. In theory, electronic medical records (EMRs) were just a substitute for paper records; nevertheless, they have brought about substantial changes to the working circumstances of nurses and other professionals in the healthcare business. This study introduces a novel approach to improve user satisfaction within Semarang City context, which could potentially be implemented globally. The impact of modern technology was investigated by applying Aggelidis and Chatzouglou's End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) approaches to previous health information system (HIS). As a result, the fundamental model was enhanced by including a new factor known as "technology compatibility." This research aims to develop a perspective that can measure the degree of satisfaction experienced by end users. Italso investigates the influence of technical compatibility component, which wasrecently included. Quantitative correlation was chosen as the approach for crosssectional analysis. Approximately 200 participants took part in the study effort. Every single survey question was structured into a five-point Likert scale, which was then reviewed again by specialists from a range of highly specialized fields. The explanatory factor analysis served as the foundation for the final structure of the measuring instrument. PLS-SEM, or partial least structural equation modeling, was used to analyze the data collected by stratified random sampling. As a result, the quality of information, the quality ofsystem, the supporting resources, and the compatibility of technology are all factors that impact user satisfaction. Implementing changes and breakthroughs in information system would increase overall user satisfactio
Governance Models and Stunting: Comparative Policy Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Mexico
162 million children worldwide are affected by stunting, which has serious societal repercussions (WHO, 2021). In order to identify institutional drivers of success, this study compares the governance styles used to address stunting in Mexico (hybrid), Malaysia (centralised), and Indonesia (decentralised). Through a qualitative examination of 45 coverage documents (2015–2023) and 72 stakeholder interviews, we find that Malaysia's NPAN uses cross-regional cooperation to reduce stunting by 12%, while Indonesia's bureaucratic fragmentation hinders implementation. The importance of network engagement is emphasized in Mexico's PENSAN application. By showing how adaptive frameworks that are adapted to local capacities improve fitness outcomes, the study advances the idea of collaborative governance. Malaysia is a prime example of a collaborative governance model that involves a fewstakeholders and improves its national nutrition strategy. Mexico's comprehensive strategy, which combines health and social regulations, underscores the significance of community engagement in public health initiatives. A comparative analysis of stunting incidence indicates that Indonesia (20.0%) and Malaysia (24.3%) face significant challenges in reducing stunting rates, whereas Mexico (13.9%) has made greater progress in this area. This study gives contribution to the study of public administration by illustrating how centralized (Malaysia), decentralized (Indonesia), and hybrid (Mexico) governance systems influence the effectiveness of health interventions. It provides critical insights for policymakers and practitioners, advocating for inclusive stakeholder participation and the necessity of context specific solutions. This study redefines discussions on decentralization in global health governance and fills the gap on cross-national governance analyses in stunting policy. This study indicates that policymakers ought to promote institutional flexibility and participatory design to attain SDG objectives
Unlocking the Role of Actor Networks and Strategies for Developing Collaborations in Regional Featured MSEs
The crisis has raised concerns about behavioral adaptation and resilience changes in micro and small enterprises (MSEs). As a result, MSEs need to get policy support by determining policy strategies oriented towards collaboration schemes. This study explores the actor network of MSEs of regional superior products and determines the right policy strategy to encourage a broader and more sustainable collaboration process. This study contributes to creating collaborative policy strategy directions for SMEs by utilizing actor networks. This research focuses on elaborating the concepts of network governance and collaborative governance. The study employed a descriptive qualitative method through empirical mapping of MSE stakeholder actors using Miro Apps. Data was analyzed using IFAS-EFAS techniques to determine suitable strategies for supporting MSE policies. The results show the dynamics and complexity of the MSE network with its main vital actors: state andnon-state actors. Strategic efforts can be realized through rotation functions to achieve a productive economy by optimizing the potential for adaptive collaboration through MSE policies on superior products by minimizing existing weaknesse
Uncovering Jakarta Air Pollution Problem Using Classification Analysis of Public Policy
This research aims to obtain formal problems and policy recommendations related to the air pollution phenomenon in Jakarta. Air pollution is a phenomenon of environmental quality degradation caused by several human activities. In the long run, emission load compounds produced by air pollution have been proven to threaten human survival. This issue needs to be addressed by the government by identifying the root causes and exploring alternative solutions to mitigate and prevent the worst impacts of air pollution. This research uses a qualitative research method of literature study by disseminating research results, reports, and news about air pollution in Jakarta. This research led to the formulation of a formal problem regarding the causes of air pollution in Jakarta, which is attributed to a linear increase in population, coinciding with the development of industries and the growing use of motorized vehicles, resulting in high exhaust emissions. The findings of this research indicate that motorized vehicles are the primary factor contributing to air pollution in Jakarta, as they are the main cause of high levels of air pollution in the city. This was identified using a multi-step process of public policy analysis, from classification analysis to the use of the pros and cons method. To overcome these problems, this research proposes policy recommendations that focus on increasing control over the number of vehicles through effective parking management in public spaces
Collaborative Governance in Indonesia’s Nutritious Food Policy: A Multi-Stakeholder Implementation Model
Indonesia continues to face substantial challenges in achieving food security andnutritional adequacy, with nearly 70% of its population unable to afford healthy diet and childhood stunting rates remaining above 20%. Addressing these complex, interlinked issues requires a coordinated, multisectoral response. This study critically examines the implementation of the National Nutritious Food Policy, focusing on the role of stakeholder collaboration within a proposed model that combines two collaborative perspectives, based on the cluster model and the Ansell & Gash collaborative frameworks. This has made the analysis relevant to both practical and theoretical contexts. By employing a qualitative analysis grounded in a literature review and policy analysis, the research identifies four strategic pillars essential to policy success: governance and policy management, food provision and distribution, inter-organizational collaboration and promotion, and monitoring and evaluation. The study emphasizes the need for an integrated institutional framework that aligns national priorities with local capacities, including the engagement of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes), and community organizations. Findings highlight that sustained improvements in food security and public health outcomes depend on solid coordination, infrastructure development, and inclusive stakeholder participation. The study contributes to the growing discourse on collaborative governance in public policy, particularly in thecontext of national nutrition interventions. It offers practical insights for optimizing multi-actor implementation strategies in Indonesia’s food system