REAL-PhD

Bardocz-Bencsik, Mariann

Sport for development and peace – investigating the field

Kozma, Dorottya Edina

A fenntartható fejlődés empirikus vizsgálata az Európai Unióban

Svigruha, Réka

A biomolekuláktól a viselkedésig: vízi modell állatok komplex válaszai progesztogén hatóanyagok hosszútávú terhelése során

Guba, Sándor

Mágneses kolloidok viselkedése külső elektromágneses terekben

Rauch, Renáta

Az alginit szorpciós tulajdonságainak tanulmányozása szerves szennyezőanyagok eltávolítása céljából

Fodor, Melinda

Vízoldható fém-porfirin komplexek fotofizikai és fotokémiai vizsgálata. Felületaktív mangán(III)-porfirinek spektrális tulajdonságai és viselkedésük fotokatalitikus rendszerekben

Szigeti, Krisztina Mónika

10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011
10.24395/KRE.2021.011


Alapjog vagy alapelv? : A tisztességes polgári eljárás fogalmának változásai a hazai rendesbíróságok joggyakorlatában

Farnadi-Jerusálmi, Márk Ernő

A historical analysis of the differences between Ashkenazic Scribal styles, namely, the Arizal and the Beth Yosef

Kondákor, Szabolcs

 
PhD Thesis 
 
SZABOLCS KONDÁKOR  
 
 
 
 
Gábor Pécsváradi's 
Compendiosa descriptio 
and Franciscan Literature 
 
 
Supervisor: 
KORNÉL SZOVÁK KORNÉL DSC SENIOR LECTURER 
 
 
 
 
 
Pázmány Péter Catholic University 
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 
Doctoral School of Linguistics 
Classical Philology Workshop 
Budapest 
2021  
 
  
 
Aims and objectives: 
Compendiosa descriptio is the only existing description of the Holy Land 
written by a Hungarian author that was published in the Middle Ages and 
within a short period of time there were two subsequent editions in Vienna. It 
was translated by Béla Holl and published in Hungarian in 1983 with the title 
‘Jeruzsálemi utazás’ (Journey to Jerusalem). 
Whereas the 1521 publication (RMK III 189, and RMK III 5107, version 
P) names observant Franciscan Gábor Pécsváradi as the author, the colophon 
of an undated edition printed by the same printhouse (RMK III 75, version 
F) has Franciscan monk Miklós Farnádi as the author. 
Due to the lack of clarity regarding its authorship, the above work has 
entered the history of Hungarian literature as the first case of plagiarism 
through the work of Ferenc Toldy and Károly Széchy. The consensus reached 
subsequent to a study conducted by Széchy in 1897, remained unquestioned 
for 120 years in Hungary, according to which Farnádi plagiarised 
Pécsváradi’s text by omitting P’s personal experiences F thereby creating a 
shortened version published under a pseudonym. The above consensus was 
accepted despite the fact that the authorship of F prior to that of P can already 
be found in German language biographies of literature on pilgrimage.  
The reception of Compendiosa descriptio was none the less facilitated by 
the fact that although Péter Hatala published parts of P in Magyar Sion, 
further publications that did not retain the medieval characteristics of the 
text's latinity and consistently omitted the literary parts conveyed a false 
picture about the entire Compendiosa descriptio.  
This false picture was finally augmented by Béla Holl who made the text 
of version P available in Hungarian translation with an additional 
 
introductory part and notes. Later, the introduction was further extended and 
published as a separate paper. Thorough research conducted by Holl revealed 
the most important features of the work: the unique structure including four 
main parts based on the four points of the compass and chapters incorporating 
five main points. While he attributed the former structural characteristic to 
Franciscan influence, namely, the description of the Holy Land by Anselmus 
de Cracovia during his pilgrimage in 1507–1508, the latter, according to him, 
may have derived from scholastic divisions. Holl identified most of the 
sources including unmarked scenes from apocryphal books. He identified 
Berhnard Breydenbach’s work as the source of descriptions of Egyptian 
scenes. An important finding of Holl’s was that Pécsváradi’s letter to János 
Bánffy, was brought back to public attention. Nevertheless, it has to be 
mentioned that his translation deviates from the original in many respect and 
contains factual errors as well.  
Preparing a critical edition, which was necessitated by the facts that the 
original latin text was difficult to access and that it is a unique piece of 
medieval Hungarian literature, revealed data that proved superior to the 
question of who plagiarised whom; namely, the issue of the relationship and 
connection between the two editions. It has become clear that F was 
genetically prior and that the work underwent substantial revision. Thus, it 
was necessary to clarify why there was a need for two editions and to what 
extent F was attributable to Pécsváradi as its author. Upon collationing, it was 
found that the foreword to F mentions a map consisting of four parts to be 
found at the back of the book, together with a binary system of indulgences 
including the plenary and the 7 years and 7 lent of indulgences  options that 
could both be gained at places of pilgrimage. Although this explained the 
 
four-part structure, novel sources of information had to be analysed: i.e. 
maps.  
Methodology: 
The thesis discusses the historical background of Compendiosa descriptio,  
the description of the Holy Land, through the life of Franciscan monk Gábor 
Pécsváradi and his relationship with the Bánffay family of Alsólendva. 
Subsequently, the thesis outlines the reception history of Compendiosa 
descriptio.  The analysis of his relationship with the  Bánffay family and that 
of the court culture gaining ground in this noble household was necessitated 
by Jakab Bánffy’s pilgrimage, Pécsváradi's chaplainship in the Bánffy 
household and information relating to the Turks in a letter to János Bánffy. 
The main part of the thesis analyses a section that can be found in both 
editions of Compendiosa descriptio describing the liturgy of the holy fire the 
source of which, that had previously been unknown, has been found by the 
author of the present thesis in a liturgical codex from Barletta published by 
Charles Kohler. Through the philological analysis of the texts from this 
ordinal book and those in F and P versions, my aim was to clarify the 
relationship between F and P due to the fact that the excerpt, as opposed to 
other sources of the Compendiosa descriptio available in printed format, were 
difficult to obtain.  
Via analysing references upon the map in F my aim was to reconstruct 
features of the missing map used in Compendiosa descriptio and to 
investigate to which of the maps depicting the Holy Land it may have had the 
closest similarity.  
Through the in-depth analysis of sources and identification of previously 
unidentified borrowings, my prior aim was to demonstrate Pécsváradi's 
 
relationship with respect to works written for members of his order and 
further preaching aids.  
The five-part structure as a governing principle is demonstrated by a table 
in the appendices part and by numbering the revisions based on findings in 
the literature on medieval Hungarian and Central-European mnemotechnic 
methods. Furthermore, the thesis investigates changes in titles including the 
merge or division of titles and the possibility of number symbolism in the 
background of the number of chapters in either F or P. 
By outlining the syntactic, lexical and stylistic differences between the two 
editions, I intended to characterise the latin language skills of Pécsváradi and 
to highlight linguistic features that further prove the fact that the fundamental 
text of Compendiosa descriptio is not Pécsváradi’s own work but a borrowing 
that underwent minor revision in F and more extensive revision in P. 
By discussing rules and regulations governing literary activities of 
Franciscan monks as defined by Franciscan leadership and opinion with 
respect to authorship my prior aim was to examine the disparity that could 
have led to allegations of plagiarism, the author of F being unknown despite 
the fact that personal experiences mentioned suggest Pécsváradi as the 
author- while P has Gábor (Pécsváradi) the title page. Consequently, the 
thesis examines structural changes from the aspect of authorship.  
  
 
Novel Results 
The thesis could only reveal few details with respect to the life of Pécsváradi: 
based on two parallel travel diaries, he is supposed to have left the Holy Land 
with Jakab Bánffy and that they visited the monastery in Cyprus which owns 
the cross of the thief right to Jesus. As regards the presence of knight culture, 
while there seem to be numerous data available in the Bánffy family history 
there is a complete lack of reference to it in Compendiosa descriptio. 
Accordingly, accounts on deeds of crusaders is quite superficial and overly 
moralising: besides the character of Buillon Godfried only legends 
recounting Christian crusaders of Charles the Great and Saint Stephen are 
mentioned.  
The comparison of the section about the lithurgy of the holy fire in the 
Codex of Barletta with the texts of  F and P it has become apparent  that F 
could not originate from P. On account of the paleographically consistently 
wrong characters depicted in F, it seems to be the first printed version of a 
manuscript.  However, based on the similarities between the two editions, 
version P was undoubtedly printed subsequent to and on the basis of F Due 
to data from the map missing from F nonetheless supplied in P, P could only 
come to existence as a result of consulting both edition F and the manuscript. 
Summing it up, F is not an abridged version based on P, but a first edition 
of a manuscript from the Holy Land brought by Pécsváradi and partly revised 
by him, which by all means retained the characteristics of the compiled 
sources better, than P, while P is revised edition based on F and the original 
manuscript as well. 
 
 
The thesis discusses the historical background of Compendiosa descriptio,  
the description of the Holy Land, through the life of Franciscan monk Gábor 
Pécsváradi and his relationship with the Bánffay family of Alsólendva. 
Subsequently, the thesis outlines the reception history of Compendiosa 
descriptio. 
Contrary to the general view held in the history of Hungarian literature the 
philological examination of the two editions of Compendiosa descriptio has  
proved that the text of the undated edition by Miklós Farnádi, published in 
Vienna ( RMK III 75; version F) is not the shortened, ’plagiarised’ version 
based on the 1521 edition (RMK III 189 and RMK III 5107; version P) but 
the first edition of the manuscript brought by Pécsváradi from the Holy Land, 
which he partially revised. Compared to P, this edition maintains more of the 
features of the original sources. P has been proved to be a revised edition 
based on F and the original manuscript.  
The map mentioned in the prologue of F,  entitled Compendium locorum 
Terre Sancte, which is missing from both editions, was most probably a 
drawing similar to Breydenbach’s map of Jerusalem depicting Jerusalem 
from a distance, indicating the four cardinal points and the nearby sacred 
places of the Holy Land mostly used in the context of virtual pilgrimage, 
showing many details of the Holy City, for example the two doorways of the 
Golden Gate. 
Based on references in F to pictures depicting the Church of Holy 
Sepulchre and the holy cave of Bethlehem, the thesis has found the closest 
connection of the missing map with the fragmentary map of Hermannus 
Borculus. Therefore, Compendiosa descriptio provides written evidence of a 
map developed by Franciscans that was either a direct inspiration for 
 
compiling the Breydenbach-map or was directly originating from it but was 
definitely a drawing inspiring the  Borculus-map.  
Virtual pilgrimages mainly practiced in cloisters in Flanders meant saying 
prayers at paintings depicting holy places or at designated places in cloisters 
or they could include physical exercises according to the passage for which 
they used texts taken from descriptions of the Holy Land that were 
transformed. Transformation of these texts meant changes to the order of 
places, omitting descriptions of personal experience, adding precise data on 
latitude, translations to the language of the public or the appearance of 
feminine pronouns. Precise data on size served the purpose of locating 
stations, counting steps taken along the ambulatory or the creation of metric 
relics.  
The Compendiosa descriptio exemplifies the marked presence of female 
saints of the Holy Land the addition of interesting data on distance 
furthermore, it provides references to a female target audience and to the 
purpose of the work being an aid for both physical and spiritual pilgrimage. 
Nevertheless, both the expansion of descriptions of personal experience 
included and the geographical determinants used for the structure go against 
Western practice. Data from medieval Hungary are only available from 
sources of the Order of Saint Paul the First Hermit including altars set 
according to events of the passage. Relations of the Bánffy family did surely 
possess a metric relic. Consequently, while the existence of the map proves 
the structural division of the work according to the four seasons, the concept 
of virtual pilgrimages explain some of the revisions and changes made by 
Pécsváradi.  
 
The thesis identifies, as one of the main features of the revised edition, the 
5-part structure of chapters already present if F, uniformly used in P with the 
aim to separate or merge individual chapters. While earlier research 
suggested its origin to have been that of the scholastic division of texts, the 
thesis provides an explanation for the above through the method used in 
mnemotechnics. 
This is further supported by contemporary theoretical texts analysed by 
Gábor Kiss Farkas et al. that are closely linked to observant Franciscans. It 
does not contradict virtual pilgrimages however, as mnemotechnic methods 
were also based on building up an imaginary space, what is more, 
mnemotechnic spaces were also created using routes of pilgrimage. 
The thesis discusses the use of previously unidentified liturgical and pious 
sources  among them that of works by members of the order of Pécsváradi: 
Pelbárt Temesvári and Osvát Laskai. Precisely checking the given loci it 
became apparent that P made correction to F and that the use of the two main 
sources that were quoted several times (works of Alphonsus de Spina and 
Nicolaus de Lyra) was actually more widespread than indicated by 
Pécsváradi. 
The joint appearance of quotations from glossa ordinaria, glossa 
interlinearis suppose the existence of a printed bible with a glossary generally 
including the work of Mathias Döring in which he defends Nicolaus de Lyra 
against the criticism of Paulus Burgensis. Discussion of the nature of 
authorship that has not been previously researched in the literature is to be 
found in the work of Döring in the section on the first psalm; the part about 
the authorship of psalms. Applying the fundamental tenets of Döring based 
on Aristotle upon undeclared texts, the primary author is not the writer of the 
 
literary material but the creator of the literary form. Consequently, the 
creation of the five-part structure plays a pivotal role in connection with 
authorship.  
The linguistic and stylistic analysis of the two editions have revealed that 
compared to F, P is a substantially extended, thoroughly revised version 
clearly representing the intentions and linguistic competence of Pécsváradi, 
the author. The several, consistent differences between the two editions in 
terms of syntax, lexis and discourse clearly demonstrate that a large 
proportion of text F was not written by Pécsváradi himself. The above aptly 
supplements and supports findings of the philological analysis conducted and 
highlights Pécsváradi’s efforts to employ an adequately elaborate and 
sophisticated language and style manifesting in parts revealing an incredibly 
rich array of stylistic skills.   
Findings of the thesis are based on the text and identified sources of the 
critical edition of Compendiosa descriptio published parallel with the present 
work. The appendix contains an analysis of a poem entitled Peregrinatio 
Laurentii de Taar attached to the Gyöngyös copy of P the source of which, 
contrary to prior research, can be found in Walter de Chatillon’s  Alexandreise 
and not in Mandeville. 
  
 
Publications related to the topic of the thesis  
Studies: 
KONDÁKOR Szabolcs: Pécsváradi Gábor Jeruzsálemi utazásának 
szerzőségéről. In: BALÁZS József – BOJTOS Anita et alii (szerk.): Studia 
Varia Tanulmánykötet. Budapest [Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem 
Bölcsészettudományi Kar 2016, 154–167. (online kiadás: 
https://btk.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/960623/file/PDK_k%C3%B6tet.pdf) 
Lectures: 
KONDÁKOR Szabolcs: Pécsváradi Gábor Jeruzsálemi utazásának 
szerzőségéről. Pázmány Doktori Konferencia. Budapest, 2016, február 5. 
KONDÁKOR Szabolcs: Indulgenze e passi –La descrizione della Terra Santa 
di un francescano osservante ungherese, Gabriele di Pécsvárad. Utazás és 
spiritualitás a klasszikus és a neolatin kultúrákban. Budapest, 2018. május 
18. 
KONDÁKOR Szabolcs: Szentek Legendái Pécsváradi Gábor Szentföldi 
utazásában. XIII. Magyar Ókortudományi Konferencia. Szeged, 2018. 
május 25. 
KONDÁKOR Szabolcs: Változatok a Szentföldre. Pécsváradi Gábor 
Compendiosa descriptiója. Középkorral foglalkozó doktoranduszok 
konferenciája. Budapest, 2021. június  


Pécsváradi Gábor Jeruzsálemi utazása és a ferences irodalom

Breser, Britta

Publish or Perish?

Not a member yet