DEDIKASI JURNAL MAHASISWA
Not a member yet
723 research outputs found
Sort by
PUTUSAN PAILIT TERHADAP HARTA WARISAN MILIK DEBITUR DITINJAU MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN
ABSTRAK Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ini didasarkan pada beberapa asas. Asas-asas tersebut antara lain adalah Asas keseimbangan, Asas kelangsungan Usaha, Asas Keadilan dan Asas Integrasi.Dari Penyusunan skripsi ini dengan menggunakan metode kepustakaan (library research) yaitu dengan mendasarkan kepada bahan kepustakaan baik berupa pendapat para ahli hukum dan juga ketentuan perundang-undangan yang ada kaitan dengan masalah tersebut diatas.Adapun kesimpulan yang dapat dikemukakan adalah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 207 UUK-PKPU, harta kekayaan orang yang meninggal harus dinyatakan dalam keadaan pailit, apabila dua atau beberapa kreditor mengajukan permohonan untuk itu dan secara singkat dapat membuktikan bahwa : Utang orang yang meninggal, semasa hidupnya tidak dibayar lunas; atau pada saat meninggalnya orang tersebut harta peninggalannya tidak cukup untuk membayar utangnya.Menurut Pasal 40 ayat (1) UUK-PKPU, warisan yang selama kepailitan jatuh kepada debitor pailit, oleh kurator tidak boleh diterima, kecuali apabila menguntungkan harta pailit. Logika ketentuan-ketentuan Pasal 40 ayat (1) dapat dimengerti karena tidak mustahil debitor pailit bukan menerima warisan berupa piutang tetapi menerima warisan utang. Apabila debitor pailit menerima warisan berupa piutang (tagihan) maka warisan tersebut akan menguntungkan harta pailit. Akan tetapi, apabila debitor pailit menerima warisan berupa utang, maka warisan tersebut akan membebani harta pailit. Sudah tentu hal tersebut bukan saja debitor pailit, tetapi juga para kreditornya.Bila merujuk pada pasal 209 Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang UUK-PKPU yang bunyinya sebagai berikut “Putusan pernyataan pailit berakibat demi hukum dipisahkannya harta kekayaan orang yang meninggal dari harta kekayaan ahli warisnya.” Sehingga pertanggung jawaban ahli waris debitor terhadap putusan pailit demi hukum sudah dipisahkan dari harta kekayaan orang yang meninggal oleh UU No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
FUNGSI ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PERJANJIAN PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG PADA KOPERASI SERBA USAHA KALIANUSA DI TINJAU DARI PASAL 1338 AYAT (3) KITAB UNDANG - UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA
ABSTRACT The function of good faith is very important because to restrict the arbitrary action against others who are vigilant and then to provide legal protection to the honest parties in the implementation of the agreement. Both parties must be acting in good faith in implementing the agreement. There are times when good faith has been fully carried out and considered, but the implementation of the agreement is still in deadlock (deadlock). This is where the attention is required towards compliance so that an event can be completed satisfactorily. Of course, as with all the goods things that contain award (waardering), compliance is not likely to result in a settlement of events that satisfy every man, but always is not absolute (relatief), which is worth in the thoughts and feelings of the people in charge of solving a events, such as the Judge or the Administration after the notice of all the factors, which can be used in the minds and feelings of the nature of it. With good faith and trust both parties. Then occurred close relationship between the doctrine of good faith in the implementation of the agreement and the theory of confidence at the time of the agreement. The good faith (Article 1338, paragraph 3) and appropriateness (Article 1339) is generally mentioned in the same breath, if the judge after examining the appropriateness of an agreement can not be implemented then it means that the agreement was contrary to public order and decency. Agreement is not only determined by the parties in the formulation of the agreement, but also determined by the good faith and decency, so in good faith and decency were also determines the content of the agreement. Thus a particular treaty agreement borrowing money if implemented not in good faith (in bad faith), then the agreement is contrary to public order and morality and legal norms in force. And the parties to the treaty shall avoid the execution of the agreement in bad faith. It happens then the harmed can file a judicial directive and protected by law
IMPLEMENTASI HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP REHABILITASI TAHANAN DI LAPAS NARKOTIKA SAMARINDA
ABSTRACTNumber of drug users in Indonesia. Currently almost 5 million Indonesians are drug addicts, it makes the entry of drugs illegally into Indonesia as if never stopped, either through land border, sea or air, should the addicts be noticed by their respective families and then submitted for Immediate rehabilitation of drug users, if not rehabilitated it will never recover and escape from the influence of the drug. Punishment is not optimal for drug dealers. The punishment should be given to the perpetrators of drugs is maximum punishment in the hope that the person is sorry for his actions and carried out coaching in order to change his life with the skills given as living capital when it is free. Human rights protection should not be the burden of the state, but it is the way the government carries out its mandate as the highest authority organization. The victim's problem in Law Number 35 Year 2009 is because it uses various terms namely "addict", "patient", "abuser" "Victims of abusers". The Narcotics Correctional Institution of Samarinda City categorizes narcotic drug into several levels of narcotics users. Correctional institutions are expected to run a penitentiary system so that convicted narcotics (or known as prisoners / WBP) are aware of mistakes, improve themselves, do not repeat So that criminal acts, can be accepted back by the community environment, Can actively play a role in development, and can live as a reasonable life a good and responsible citizen, and not a recidivistKeywords : Human Rights, Coaching Prisoners, Narcotic
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEJAHATAN SKIMMER TERHADAP PEMBOBOLAN ANJUNGAN TUNAI MANDIRI (ATM) BANK DITINJAU MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 10 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERBANKAN
ABSTRACTThe development of the technological results in the banking sector that can help facilitate the activities of banking transactions for customers is Automated Teller Machines (ATM) specifically to the ATM that became the focus of the author, in its development reap some threats and losses of the debiting of the ATM card which also serves as A Debit Card that reduces the number of accounts unwanted by the customer due to the actions and unlawful acts (PMH) of a third party by way of Skimming Card or the efforts of a person or a group of people to duplicate information contained in the magnetic tape on the ATM card. The prevention efforts contained in Law Number 10 of 1988 concerning Banking based on prudential principles as set forth in articles 29 and 47 on bank secrets and as well as prefentive action is the importance of providing legal protection for bank customers in the ATM use agreement by parties bank as an ATM card issuer that can minimize customer losses
Perlindungan Konsumen Rokok Elektrik Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine how effective the implementation of legislation in protecting consumers of Electric Cigarettes reviewed from Law Number 36 Year 2009 on Health and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. And how the efforts of Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) and Health Office of Samarinda Protect Consumer E-Cigarette (E-Cigarette) This research was conducted in Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Provincial Health Office and East Kalimantan Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) Office By conducting interviews related to this research. In addition, the authors also interviewed with some elktronik cigarette seller and also conducted interviews to several Consumers Electronic Cigarettes. Based on the results of the discussion of the author, it can be concluded as follows: the application or effectiveness Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health and Law No. 8 of 1999 About Consumer Protection in practice has not been realized, whereas Electronic Cigarettes can be categorized as Tobacco Products because it has Meet the qualification of addictive substances. Effort of Health Service to protect consumer of Electronic Cigarette until now is only danger warning to use Electronic Cigarette to society by taking result of research sample which have done by State first doing research on Electronic Cigarette and Health Department have not conducted official research related to Electronic Cigarette so that not yet PP 109 Year 2012 as a rule of law that can be applied to Electronic Cigarettes, it takes legal efforts from the government regarding the existence of Electronic Cigarettes in the community, especially about what legal rules that can normatively be a legal umbrella for Electronic Cigarettes, this is to protect consumer rights in Indonesia. Health Office and Food and Beverage Supervisory Agency (BPOM) need to conduct an official research on Electronic Cigarettes,Keywords: Electric Cigarette Hazards, Regulatory Effectivenes
TINJAUN YURIDIS PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI TANAH SECARA ANGSURAN DI KOTA SAMARINDA
ABSTRACTLand ownership is very important for the country, nation and people of Indonesia as a society that is building towards the development of industry. Land that is a basic need for human beings will be faced with various things such as land limitations both in quantity and quality compared with the needs that must be met.The abolition of this agreement is due to the inability of the buyer in this case the buyer to settle the purchase price on a plot of land previously agreed with the seller. The inability of repayment is then used as the basis or reason for the buyer to cancel the sale and purchase of a piece of land.While the legal protection is repressive that is legal protection given if there has been a dispute that the injured party in the sale and purchase agreement is actively taking legal action by filing a civil lawsuit to the local District Court to cancel the sale and purchase agreement on the land, The fairest verdict.Keywords: Purchase of Land, Repurchase Right
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DENGAN PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA
ABSTRACT Legal research is aimed to know about the protection of freedom of speech through the medium of the internet which is regulated in the law number 11 year 2008 aboutinformation and transaction of electronic reviewed from the perspective of human rights. This research is a normative law research that is prescriptive. The method used in this research is juridical normative. Secondary data sources used include the primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques used are literature studies and cyber media. The data obtained were then analyzed with the interpretation of grammatical and interpretion of the systematic of the provisions contained in the law of information and electronic transactions. The result showed that in the law number 11 year 2008 abaout information and electronic transactions can already be said to have been protection the freedom of expression that is owned by someone as a personal right to communicate through the medium of the internet. But there are some things in law enforcement as if violating human rights. As has been outlined that provisions in the law of informasion and electronic transaction related to freeom of speech is only regulated in one article and there is only a prohibition without the accompanied rights.Based on that, then that provision still raised multiple interpretations and obscurity. So it requires more settings in the law of information and electronic transactions. As a human rights are also included in the political someone and and the personal, freedom expressed absolute opinion should be protected and can not be reduced. But remember that in the right also cause an obligation to respect and appreciate the rights of others, then the implementation of yhe on the right can be limited through the legislation. While in the legislation and transaction information elekronic there is no restrictions clear about it
TINDAK PIDANA KEIMIGRASIAN TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN IZIN TINGGAL BAGI ORANG ASING KOTA SAMARINDA MENURUT UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG KEIMIGRASIAN
ABSTRACT This study entitled "Immigration Crime Against Abuse Residence Permit For Foreigners Samarinda According to Constitusin No. 6 of 2011 Concerning Immigration”. Core issues that were examined in this study are: first, how the legal action against the abuse of residence permits for foreigners Samarinda according to Constitusion No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration? second, what the Roles and Responsibilities of Class I Immigration Office Samarinda City related to Constitusion No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration? Based on the core of the problem above, the purpose of this study are: first, to know how the legal action against the abuse of residence permits for foreigners in the city of Samarinda, according to Constitusion No. 6 of 2011. Second, to find out what the roles and responsibilities of Class I Immigration Office in Samarinda relating to Constitusion No. 6 of 2011. This study is included normative juridical research, namely by reviewing the related licensing, regulations applicable law, including the norms and principles contained therein. Data was collected through library research and field research. Data analysis is done by juridical qualitative, ie the research results contained in the form of descriptive narrative From the data can Authors gather the data obtained as follows: Repression deportation against the misuse of permit to live in the city of Samarinda Period In 2015 as many as 15 foreigners, in January - June 2016 the Immigration Office of Samarinda issued at least issued 90 temporary stay permits to foreigners, while foreigners who are deported as a result of misuse of permit to live in the city of Samarinda many as 3 people. On the basis of these conclusions, the author proposes suggestions: first, Immigration Office Class I Samarinda need to increase human resources (HR) in quantity to form and train civil servant investigators (investigators) in the framework of action strangers .. Secondly, coordination between the Office Expected immigration Class I Samarinda with relevant agencies further enhanced to optimize the supervision of foreigners and measures of intelligence operations. Keywords: Immigration Crime, Constitusion No. 6 of 2011
TINJAUAN TERHADAP ZONASI PEMBANGUNAN BIG MALL SAMARINDA BERKAITAN DENGAN PENATAAN TATA KOTA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN DAERAH NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG RENCANA TATA RUANG DAN WILAYAH KOTA SAMARINDA TAHUN 2013-2034
ABSTRAKDaerah kawasan sempadan sungai adalah kawasan sepanjang kiri kanan sungai, termasuk sungai buatan/kanal/saluran irigasi primer, yang mempunyai manfaat penting untuk mempertahankan kelestarian fungsi sungai. Zonasi daerah kawasan sempadan sungai khusunya Sungai Mahakam Samarinda mengacu dalam Peraturan Daerah Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Pasal 34 ayat (2) butir (a) yakni 15 meter dari kaki tanggul sungai. Sebelum melakukan pembangunan apapun khusunya bangunan yang berada di pesisir sungai harus memperhatikan ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada salah satunya adalah ketentuan batas zonasi sempadan sungai. Selain ketentuan zonasi sempadan sungai ada beberapa hal lain yang harus diperhatikan yakni hal yang boleh dan hal-hal yang tidak boleh dilakukan berdasarkan ketentuan ITBX untuk zona perlindungan setempat dan sub zona sempadan sungai yang bersumber dari Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR) dan Peraturan Zonasi Kecamatan Sungai Kunjang Kota Samarinda.Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sejauh mana batas-batas zonasi Sungai Mahakam berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, untuk mengetahui apakah pemberian izin terhadap pembangunan Big Mall Samarinda telah sesuai dengan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, dan untuk mengetahui sanksi-sanksi terhadap pelanggaran yang terjadi berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 2 Tahun 2014.Hasil penelitian penulis berdasarkan kondisi real yang ada, maka pada penulisan skripsi ini pembangunan Big Mall Samarinda yang terletak di Jalan Untung Suropati, Sungai Kunjang Samarinda sangat dekat dengan daerah kawasan sempadan sungai dan ternyata tidak memenuhi ketentuan yang ada yakni kurang dari 15 meter sehingga hal tersebut adanya pelanggaran secara teknis yakni melanggar jarak zonasi sempadan sungai berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 dari pihak Big Mall Samarinda.Kata Kunci: Zonasi Kawasan Sempadan Sungai
KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI SEBIDANG TANAH DENGAN UANG MUKA YANG DILAKUKAN DIHADAPAN NOTARIS / PPAT
ABSTRAK Keabsahan akan jual beli yang telah dinyatakan oleh Majelis Hakim dalam perkara perdata No. 30/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Smda masih premateur. Akan tetapi sudah menjadi kenyataan dalam suatu putusan. Untuk itu seharusnya pihak yang dikalahkan atau kurang puas atas putusan tersebut, menggunakan haknya untuk melakukan upaya hukum yaitu upaya banding selama putusan pengadilan tersebut belum mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap (Inkracht Van Gewisjde), terhitung setelah 14 (empat belas) hari putusan itu diberitahukan. Akan tetapi apabila telah lewat waktu 14 (empat belas) hari sejak putusan diberikan kepada pihak yang dikalahkan namun tidak digunakan haknya, putusan pengadilan harus dianggap telah mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap (Inkracht Van Gewisjde).Kekuatan hukum perjanjian jual beli terlepas dari asas kebebasan berkontrak sebagaimana tercantum dalam pasal 1338 KUH Perdata belum bisa dikatakan mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Akan tetapi sudah menjadi suatu kenyataan, kekuatan hukum perjanjian jual beli seperti dalam kasus ini untuk dapat dikatakan kekuatan hukum perjanjian jual beli tergantung dari keabsahan yang telah diputus oleh pengadilan. Adapun kenyataannya sebagaimana telah diputus oleh pengadilan bahwa ternyata perjanjian akan jual beli telah dikuatkan dan dinyatakan sah menurut hukum. Oleh sebab itu, mau tidak mau perjanjian jual beli antara Tergugat I dengan Tergugat II menjadi batal