<intR>²Dok
Not a member yet
17605 research outputs found
Sort by
Europeans must follow legal developments in the United States closely in 2026
No full textThis contribution is the extended version of Thomas Giegerich’s welcome remarks opening an introductory course to U.S. law in Saarbrücken. It reflects on the enduring transatlantic significance of the rule of law and the deep influence of U.S. constitutional ideas on German constitutional thinking. With the United States approaching the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 2026, it asks what is at stake for constitutional democracy today
Womanhood, International Law, and the Global South: What does it take to practice international law as a young woman from the Global South?
No full text#54 Publish, Parent, Perish? Making Space for Mothers in Legal Academia
No full textMotherhood sits uneasily within the institutional imagination of international legal academia. Academic career paths are still commonly structured around expectations of uninterrupted productivity, geographic mobility, and “always-on” availability – assumptions that collide with pregnancy, postpartum recovery, and the ongoing realities of care. This episode takes that tension seriously, treating motherhood not as a private contingency to be managed individually, but as a question of academic culture and institutional design. In this episode, Sissy Katsoni and Polina Kulish sit down with Michelle Staggs Kelsall, Joyce De Coninck and Tania Ixchel Atilano to discuss the realities of motherhood in modern legal academia, the anxieties many women academics experience when considering whether and when to have children, as well as practical steps needed to make academic legal spaces more inclusive. Before the interview, Céline Chausse introduces the discussion by reflecting on the ‘Women in International Law’ symposium and the importance of bringing mothers’ experiences into conversations about legal academia as a workplace. Rishiti Choudaha then sets the stage with key facts and frameworks on the struggles facing mother and non-mother academics in contemporary legal academia and on how institutional practices continues to fall short. At a moment when many early-career scholars weigh parenthood against professional survival, this episode speaks directly to the anxieties that shape those choices and to the structural changes needed to make legal academia workable for caregivers. This special episode is part of the ‘Women in International Law’ symposium and was therefore produced in English. Have thoughts to share? We’re all ears! Whether it’s applause, reflections, or a dash of helpful critique, reach us anytime at [email protected]. Be sure to subscribe via RSS, Spotify, or wherever your favorite podcasts live. And hey, if you love what you hear, a five-star rating goes a long way! Background information (all Open Access): Völkerrechtsblog, Women in International Law Vol. 5 (2026) Lutiana Valadares Fernandes Barbosa, Pandemic, Maternity, and International Lawyers from the Global South: a Call for an Intersectional Approach (2024) Olof Ejermo, Research or Family: How Does Becoming a Parent Affect Academic Productivity? (2024) Christy Ebert Vrtis, If you’re a mother doing a PhD, expect to be ignored and undermined (2022) Karen Ramsay and Gayle Letherby, The Experience of Academic Non-Mothers in the Gendered University (2006) Xiang Zheng, Haimiao Yuan and Chaoqun Ni, How Parenthood Contributes to Gender Gaps in Academia (2022) Moderation: Céline Chausse Interview: Dr. Tania Ixchel Atilano, Dr. Joyce De Coninck, Dr Michelle Staggs Kelsall, Dr. Sissy Katsoni, Polina Kulish Background information: Rishiti Choudaha Cut: Daniela Rau Credits: Opening with Michelle Staggs Kelsall’s quote during the post-episode recording discussion. Background music: ‘Gravity of Tenderness’ created by The Fabler. Cite as Joyce De Coninck, Michelle Staggs Kelsall, Tania Ixchel Atilano, Sissy Katsoni, Polina Kulish, Céline Chausse & Rishiti Choudaha, #54 Publish, Parent, Perish? Making Space for Mothers in Legal Academia, Völkerrechtsblog, 08.03.2026