12244 research outputs found
Sort by
Impact on alcohol selection and online purchasing of changing the proportion of available non-alcoholic versus alcoholic drinks: a randomised controlled trial
Get PDFBackground:- Increasing the availability of non-alcoholic options is a promising population-level intervention to reduce alcohol consumption, currently unassessed in naturalistic settings. This study in an online retail context aimed to estimate the impact of increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic (relative to alcoholic) drinks, on selection and purchasing of alcohol. Methods and results:- Adults (n = 737) residing in England and Wales who regularly purchased alcohol online were recruited between March and July 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: “25% non-alcoholic/75% alcoholic”; “50% non-alcoholic/50% alcoholic”; and “75% non-alcoholic/25% alcoholic,” then selected drinks in a simulated online supermarket, before purchasing them in an actual online supermarket. The primary outcome was the number of alcohol units selected (with intention to purchase); secondary outcomes included actual purchasing. A total of 607 participants (60% female, mean age = 38 years [range: 18 to 76]) completed the study and were included in the primary analysis. In the first part of a hurdle model, a greater proportion of participants in the “75% non-alcoholic” group did not select any alcohol (13.1%) compared to the “25% non-alcoholic” group (3.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.09, −0.63; p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a difference between the “75% non-alcoholic” and the “50% non-alcoholic” (7.2%) groups (95% CI 0.10, 1.34; p = 0.022) or between the “50% non-alcoholic” and the “25% non-alcoholic” groups (95% CI −1.44, 0.17; p = 0.121). In the second part of a hurdle model in participants (559/607) selecting any drinks containing alcohol, the “75% non-alcoholic” group selected fewer alcohol units compared to the “50% non-alcoholic” (95% CI −0.44, −0.14; p < 0.001) and “25% non-alcoholic” (95% CI −0.54, −0.24; p < 0.001) groups, with no evidence of a difference between the “50% non-alcoholic” and “25% non-alcoholic” groups (95% CI −0.24, 0.05; p = 0.178). Overall, across all participants, 17.46 units (95% CI 15.24, 19.68) were selected in the “75% non-alcoholic” group; 25.51 units (95% CI 22.60, 28.43) in the “50% non-alcoholic” group; and 29.40 units (95% CI 26.39, 32.42) in the “25% non-alcoholic” group. This corresponds to 8.1 fewer units (a 32% reduction) in the “75% non-alcoholic” compared to the “50% non-alcoholic” group, and 11.9 fewer alcohol units (41% reduction) compared to the “25% non-alcoholic” group; 3.9 fewer units (13% reduction) were selected in the “50% non-alcoholic” group than in the “25% non-alcoholic” group. For all other outcomes, alcohol selection and purchasing were consistently lowest in the “75% non-alcoholic” group. Study limitations include the setting not being entirely naturalistic due to using a simulated online supermarket as well as an actual online supermarket, and that there was substantial dropout between selection and purchasing. Conclusions:- This study provides evidence that substantially increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic drinks—from 25% to 50% or 75%—meaningfully reduces alcohol selection and purchasing. Further studies are warranted to assess whether these effects are realised in a range of real-world settings
The language of madness
No full textThis talk explored some of the controversies around psychiatric diagnosis and the language used to describe people’s distress
Postdigital positionality
No full textPositionality refers to the individual, social, and political context that creates a person’s identity, e.g., race, class, gender, sexuality, ability, status, and how such markers influence the stance people take, or what they can access, in society. In a postdigital era, it becomes necessary to expand these markers of people’s positions to include numerous effects and potential bias from all forms of technological and biodigital, data-driven systems and related discourses. Postdigital positionality is a concept that develops former theoretical framings of positionality to reflexively acknowledge a complex interplay of new postdigital technologies and knowledge ecologies intersecting with human identity
Physical-literacy-enriched physical education: a capabilities perspective
Get PDF(1) Background: Physical literacy is increasing in popularity across the world as a concept central to the promotion of lifelong engagement in physical activity across a multitude of sectors. The education sector has embraced physical literacy as a concept worthy of focus. Physical literacy literature is bold in its claim that physical literacy should be the foundation of physical education. The objective of this paper was to understand the value of physical literacy as the goal of physical education through the lens of the capability approach; (2) Positioning: This research adopted a post-qualitative sensibility whereby knowledge is decentered, favoring the inseparability of ethics, ontology, and knowledge (ethico-onto-epistemology); (3) Discussion: Throughout the discussion, traditional humanist examples are extended to include post-humanism perspectives to offer a more holistic and ecological appreciation of the relationship between capabilities, physical literacy, and physical education, using the ten capabilities of life, bodily health, bodily integrity, senses, imagination and thought, emotions, practical reason, affiliation, other species, play, and control over one’s environment; (4) Conclusions: The paper concludes with the recommendation that the capabilities approach offers a valuable framework for the continued justification of physical-literacy-enriched physical education, which, when aligned, can help to shape the opportunities provided for children and young people in support of their holistic development and lifelong engagement in physical activity
When the webcam is off: disabled and academic identities before and during the Coronavirus pandemic
No full text
Collective writing: the continuous struggle for meaning-making
Get PDFThis paper is a summary of philosophy, theory, and practice arising from collective writing experiments conducted between 2016 and 2022 in the community associated with the Editors’ Collective and more than 20 scholarly journals. The main body of the paper summarises the community’s insights into the many faces of collective writing. Appendix 1 presents the workflow of the article’s development. Appendix 2 lists approximately 100 collectively written scholarly articles published between 2016 and 2022. Collective writing is a continuous struggle for meaning-making, and our research insights merely represent one milestone in this struggle. Collective writing can be designed in many different ways, and our workflow merely shows one possible design that we found useful. There are many more collectively written scholarly articles than we could gather, and our reading list merely offers sources that the co-authors could think of. While our research insights and our attempts at synthesis are inevitably incomplete, ‘Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making’ is a tiny theoretical steppingstone and a useful overview of sources for those interested in theory and practice of collective writing